Citations with the tag: UNITED States. Supreme Court

Results 1 - 50

• High court leaves constitutionality of Minnesota flow control to lower court.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Bond Buyer; 12/17/97, Vol. 322 Issue 30294, p6 

  States that the United States Supreme Court has refused to review an appellate court decision which order a lower court to reconsider the constitutionality of flow control ordinances. Information on the setting of these ordinances by Hennepin County, Minnesota; Reasons for the Court's decision;...

• Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company; 2009, p1 

  Presents the case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company presented before the United States Supreme Court in March of 1895. History of the case; Arguments; Opinions of Court; Comments of the Judges.

• Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company (Rehearing).
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company (Rehearing) argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Stearns v. Minnesota.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Stearns v. Minnesota argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• State of Missouri v. Holland.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case State of Missouri v. Holland argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Maxwell v. Dow.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Maxwell v. Dow argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• McCray v. United States.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case McCray v. United States argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Loewe v. Lawlor.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Loewe v. Lawlor argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Northern Securities Co. v. United States.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Northern Securities Co. v. United States argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Oregon.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Oregon argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Patton v. United States.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Patton v. United States argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Coyle v. Smith.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Coyle v. Smith argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Whitney v. California.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Whitney v. California argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Selective Draft Law Cases.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Selective Draft Law Casesargued by the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Cooley v. Board of Wardens.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Cooley v. Board of Wardens argued by the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Georgia v. Brailsford.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Georgia v. Brailsford argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Foster & Elam v. Neilson.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Foster & Elam v. Neilson argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Kendall v. United States.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Kendall v. United Statesargued by the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Kentucky v. Dennison.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Kentucky v. Dennison argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Martin v. Hunter's Lessee.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Martin v. Hunter's Lessee argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Luther v Borden.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Luther v Borden argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Prize Cases.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Prize Cases argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Talbot v. Janson.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Talbot v. Janson argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Swift v. Tyson.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Swift v. Tyson argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• United States v. Peters.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case United States v. Peters argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Willson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Company.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Willson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Company argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Worcester v. Georgia.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Worcester v. Georgia argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

• Scott v Sandford.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Scott v. Sandford argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments of the judges.

• Barron v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // Supreme Court Cases: The Early Court (1790-1864); 1999, pN.PAG 

  Presents the case Barron v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by judges.

• The judicial branch: The Supreme Court.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // World Almanac for Kids; 1996, p219 

  Focuses on the Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States. Information about the nine justices that are appointed by the president; Their duties; Importance of the decisions that they make; Picture showing the justices from 1995 through 1996.

• Day-old decisions.
  Reynolds, Katherine M. // ABA Journal; Jun96, Vol. 82 Issue 6, p14 

  Reports that the United States Supreme Court has established a computer bulletin board service with opinions available online one day after they are released.

• Common sense v. the court.
  Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator; Sep95, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p26 

  Focuses on the ideological inconsistency of the US Supreme Court for the 1994-1995 term. Striking down four acts of the US Congress in the same term; Supreme Court as being sharply divided between liberal and conservative wings; Bare majority win of conservatives in racial issues.

• Supreme Court ruling lets airlines assure jobs to strike breakers.
  Mecham, M. // Aviation Week & Space Technology; 3/6/89, Vol. 130 Issue 10, p67 

  Reports on a Supreme Court ruling that airline managers can assure jobs to employees who abandon picket lines, regardless of seniority rules, giving airlines a powerful strike-breaking tool but adding new hurdles for settlement conferences.

• Rebuilding set aside programs.
  Simms, M.C. // Black Enterprise; Sep90, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p33 

  Considers the implications of the US Supreme Court ruling on minority set aside programs in the case `The City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.' Key issues faced; Recommended strategies for re-establishing minority set asides.

• The Supreme Court and enforcement of African American rights: Myth and reality.
  Agyeman, O. // Black Scholar; Summer91, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p22 

  Argues that the US Supreme Court set out to usurp power that does not properly belong to it in a democracy. Other important assumptions made about the role and functioning of the high court; Landmark Supreme Court decisions; The notion of the Supreme Court's role as the guardian of minority rights.

• The judicial confirmation process.
  Katzmann, R.A. // Brookings Review; Winter92, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p5 

  Opinion. Discusses the recent cries from across the political spectrum for reform of the judicial confirmation process. Ideology of judicial nominees; Divided government; Interest groups; What has changed about process; Balance of responsibility between president and Senate; Other issues involved.

• Taking a look at the modern takings clause jurisprudence...
  Tufts, David W. // Brigham Young University Law Review; 1994, Vol. 1994 Issue 4, p893 

  Presents an article which explores the United States Supreme Court's analysis in interpretating and applying the Fifth amendment's Takings Clause. Examination of the Utah Supreme Court's analysis in applying Utah's Constitution's corresponding provision; Information on early federal Takings cases.

• Evidentiary Legerdemain: Deciding when Daubert should apply to social science evidence.
  Renaker, Theresa S. // California Law Review; Dec96, Vol. 84 Issue 6, p1657 

  Examines the US Supreme Court's decision concerning the Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and applications in lower courts. Function of a specialized knowledge testimony; Focus on problems presented by expert psychological testimony; Presentation of a functional test that courts should...

• Supreme Court Rulings.
  Renaker, Theresa S. // Congressional Digest; Aug/Sep90, Vol. 69 Issue 8/9, p201 

  Summarizes the six Supreme Court decisions targeted by the Civil Rights Act of 1990, including `Patterson v. McLean Credit Union,' `Martin v. Wilks' and `Lorance v. AT&T Technologies.'

• The Burger court.
  Renaker, Theresa S. // Commentary; Oct84, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p27 

  While liberals are upset that the Burger court's recent decisions are too conservative, the Court has done what has become accepted practice--interpreting the Constitution according to their social, economic and political philosophy. The author argues--on a case-by-case-basis--that most...

• Sodomy and the Supreme Court.
  Renaker, Theresa S. // Commentary; Oct86, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p57 

  Until 1961, sodomy was a crime in every state. But over the past twenty-five years, about half the states have followed the suggestion of the American Law Institute and decriminalized what is called `deviate sexual intercourse' between consenting adults, largely on the grounds that such...

• Government by lawyers & judges.
  Berns, W. // Commentary; Jun87, Vol. 83 Issue 6, p17 

  We call it judicial review, and while the point has been fiercely disputed, there is no question that the Framers of the Constitution intended federal judges to exercise the power to invalidate laws that they consider unconstitutional. Discusses how Supreme Court Justices can abuse the power of...

• Supreme Court delivers blow to consumers.
  Keating-Edh, B. // Consumers' Research Magazine; Sep89, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p20 

  Opinion. Criticizes the Supreme Court for not barring large punitive damages in private law suits in their `Browning Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal' decision. INSET: Liability's cost to consumers..

• The Supreme Court ruled.
  Nordahl, Peter E.; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor; 6/20/95, Vol. 87 Issue 143, p2 

  Reports on various rulings by the United States Supreme Court for the week of June, 20 1995. Gays in Boston, Massachusetts' St. Patrick's Day Parade; Ruling against more severe punishments for vandalism against places of worship; More.

• Court clarifies rights of employers to suspend workers without pay.
  Nordahl, Peter E.; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor; 6/10/97, Vol. 89 Issue 136, p15 

  Comments on the expected impact of a ruling by the United States Supreme Court that public employees need not receive a hearing before they are suspended without pay. Information on other rulings by the court on different issues.

• Student rights cases don't make court docket.
  Nordahl, Peter E.; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor; 10/3/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 219, p4 

  Discusses decisions of the United States Supreme Court in a variety of cases as of October 3, 2000.

• Burning the American flag.
  Nordahl, Peter E.; Mutch, David // Current Events; 9/29/89, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p1 

  Discusses the 1989 Supreme Court decision upholding the right to burn the American flag as a form of free speech. Case of protester Gregory L. Johnson; Supreme Court Justices' arguments for and against the decision; Public reaction; Proposed constitutional amendment to outlaw flag-burning. ...

Next 50 Results