Citations with the tag: PEER review (Professional performance)

Results 51 - 100

  • Avoid charges that peer review is malicious.
     // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p123 

    The article discusses how hospitals can avoid charges that their peer review of medical staff is malicious.

  • CNE questions.
     // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p126 

    A quiz about hospital peer review is presented.

  • Surveyors share three best practice ideas.
     // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p127 

    The article discusses the best practice ideas for peer review at the Newport Hospital in Rhode Island.

  • Use patient satisfaction data for improvement.
     // Hospital Peer Review; Dec2010, Vol. 35 Issue 12, p1 

    A subject index for the December 2010 issue of "Hospital Peer Review" is presented.

  • Journal of Business and Retail Management Research.
     // Journal of Business & Retail Management Research; Apr2013, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p152 

    The article offers information on the journal and provides its scope, formal conditions of acceptance, peer review process and manuscript submission procedures.

  • Mathematics: Does the proof stack up?
    Szpiro, George // Nature; 7/3/2003, Vol. 424 Issue 6944, p12 

    Focuses on a peer review conducted on a mathematician's paper on the arrangement of spheres. Use of computers in mathematics; Computer-aided proofs; Correctness of the proof.

  • New opportunities through PAR.
    Moir, Ellen; Bloom, Gary // Thrust for Educational Leadership; Jan/Feb2000, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p12 

    Focuses on the benefits from peer assistance and review program for teachers initiated by the state of California. Program as a catalyst for change in labor relations; Alignment of teacher development with standards; Program as a new paradigm in labor-management relationships. INSET: Teaching...

  • Medicare/medicaid.
    Serb, Chris // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks; 05/20/97, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p17 

    Cites the award received by Peer Review Organization for encouraging other health care providers services for Medicare beneficiaries. Projects done by the organization.

  • Acknowledgment of Peer Reviewers for 2006.
    Serb, Chris // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Audiology; Nov2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p154 

    The section acknowledges several reviewers who have reviewed manuscripts for the journal from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

  • The Power of Peer Reviews.
    Galus, Pamela // Science Teacher; Mar2002, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p70 

    Focuses on the importance of the peer review process in teaching. Commonality of peer review practice in schools; Experience of the author on peer reviews; Effectiveness of teaching.

  • Note of Appreciation / Note de Reconnaissance.
    Galus, Pamela // Canadian Journal of Forest Research; Dec2008, Vol. 38 Issue 12, piii 

    The article lists referees who reviewed manuscripts for this issue.

  • Preface of Editor in Chief.
    Hosseini, Ahmad // Cell Journal (Yakhteh); Winter2010, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p438 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editor discusses peer review as an important part of high quality scientific research in cellular and molecular related topics.

  • Does Editorial Peer Review Work?
    Lock, Stephen // Annals of Internal Medicine; 7/1/94, Vol. 121 Issue 1, p60 

    Focuses on various issues related to editorial peer review. Common concerns about editorial peer review; Comments on the masking study; Role of editors in helping peer reviewers.

  • Pros and cons of open peer review.
    Lock, Stephen // Nature Neuroscience; Mar1999, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p197 

    Editorial. Examines the advantages and disadvantages of open peer review in the field of neuroscience. Primary role of review process; Bias against female applicants in grant review; Conflicts of interest.

  • Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
    Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Nature; 2/13/2003, Vol. 421 Issue 6924, p689 

    Responds to M.H. Dominiczak's comments on peer review process in Correspondence. Factors that contribute to improve the quality of reviews; Quality of the journals and the frequency of reviews; Proposal to improve the quality and status of reviewing.

  • Acknowledgement to reviewers 2002/2003.
    Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Anatomy & Embryology; May2003, Vol. 206 Issue 6, p507 

    Presents a list of peer reviewers for the 2002 and 2003 issues of the journal "Anatomy & Embryology."

  • Beware the jury of peers.
    Watson, Traci // U.S. News & World Report; 06/02/97, Vol. 122 Issue 21, p14 

    Discusses the practice of peer review among scientists, used to decide whether scientists get government grants and to weigh which articles should run in scientific journals. Allegations of sexism and cronyism among the peer reviews; How most scientists feel about peer review.

  • More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?
    Klein, John R. // Nature Immunology; Oct2001, Vol. 2 Issue 10, p892 

    Presents an article by Benedicta Rocha which provides suggestions for improving the peer review process. Opportunity for anonymous work evaluation of investigators; Provision of details of the authors and their affiliated institutions upon their request; Advantages and disadvantages of...

  • Acknowledgment.
    Klein, John R. // Modern Rheumatology (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.); Dec2008, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p651 

    People that the editor-in-chief and members of the Editorial Board would like to thank for their assistance in their peer reviews during 2008 are mentioned including AKira Hashiramoto of Kobe University, Hideto Akama of Eisai Co. Ltd., and Takao Fujii of Kyoto University.

  • Editorial.
    DAWES, C. // Journal of Dental Research; Dec1990, Vol. 69 Issue 12, p1867 

    A list of reviewers for the "Journal of Dental Research," is presented, including D. W. Allmann, L. Alvesalo and L. C. Anderson.

  • 2013 Reviewers.
    DAWES, C. // Journal of Nursing Education; Jan2014, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p5 

    The article presents a list of reviewers such as Jean M. Klein, Linda C. Andrist, and Mollie E. Aleshire who, between December 11, 2012 and December 15, 2013, contributed to the revision of manuscripts published in the journal.

  • Thank You ...
    Leonard, Bill // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache; Nov2009, Vol. 71 Issue 9, p518 

    The article list individuals who peer-reviewed manuscripts submitted to the journal in 2009.

  • From the Blogosphere.
    Leonard, Bill // Nature; 4/23/2009, Vol. 458 Issue 7241, p944 

    The article discusses a blog entry on the need for regulation and grading of peer reviewing activities.

  • From the Editor in Chief Jacqueline Maus Feldman.
    Leonard, Bill // Community Mental Health Journal; Dec2013, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p857 

    People including Mohamed Sherif, Mohan Kumar, and Priya Balaji who the author would like to thank for their assistance in the creation of the journal "Community Mental Health Journal" are mentioned.

  • The vital reviewer.
    Slovis, Thomas L.; Chapman, Stephen // Pediatric Radiology; Dec2008, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p1271 

    People who the author would like to thank for reviewing articles from October 2007 to September 2008 are mentioned.

  • Toledo Union eliminates peer-review program.
    Bradley, Ann // Education Week; 5/3/95, Vol. 14 Issue 32, p3 

    Reports on the Toledo Federation of Teachers' cancellation of its peer-review program in a dispute with the school board over extra pay for principals. Dispute over labor practices between the organization and the school board; Labor-management relations in the district; Intern-intervention...

  • In the Pipeline -- So What's Going On With Peer Review, Anyway?
    Bradley, Ann // Contract Pharma; Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p25 

    The article presents the author's comment on the importance of peer review on the reactome paper published in a very high profile journal.

  • Correction.
    Bradley, Ann // Nature; 6/5/2008, Vol. 453 Issue 7196, p711 

    A correction to the article "Working double-blind" that was published in the previous issue is presented.

  • Are we being true to the peer-review process?
    El-Masri, Maher M. // Nurse Researcher; 2011, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p92 

    The author emphasizes the responsibility of editors, reviewers and authors to ensure that peer reviews of manuscripts in the field of nursing that are submitted for publication are as rigorous and meaningful as possible. He describes the responsibility of editors to make sure that the reviewers...

  • Journal reviewing: Is It in need of reform?
    Piniagua, Hilary // British Journal of Nursing; 7/24/2003, Vol. 12 Issue 14, p836 

    Comments on the article 'Journal reviewers and reviews: should the system be revised?' published in a previous issue of the 'British Journal of Nursing.' Dedication involved in reviewing articles; Goals of becoming a reviewer; Need to propose an alternative approach to ensuring the quality of a...

  • The PEER project: a model of peer review.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // British Journal of Midwifery; Apr2003, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p227 

    Evaluates a model of peer review for midwives in Great Britain. Application of peer review in midwifery; Role of supervisors of midwives in a peer review; Principle anticipated benefits of peer review; Positive nature of responses.

  • Practice Personnel Peer and Self Evaluation.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // Journal of Perinatology; Apr2002 Supplement 1, Vol. 22 Issue 3, pS42 

    Journal of Perinatology (2002) 22, S42–S44 DOI: 10.1038/sj/jp/7210725

  • Correction.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR); Aug1994, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p322 

    This article presents a correction to the May 1994 issue of the "Journal of Marketing Research."

  • 2013 Reviewers of the Year.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // Environmental Health Perspectives; Feb2014, Vol. 122 Issue 2, pA37 

    The article reports on top Reviewers of the Year 2013 recognized by the periodical including John Balmes, Daniel Axelrad, and Joe Braun who received high ratings from the Associate Editors for quality and timeliness of reviews and each completed minimum of five reviews in 2013.

  • Anonymously avoiding egos.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // Industrial Engineer: IE; Aug2014, Vol. 46 Issue 8, p13 

    The article briefly describes a study conducted by researchers at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) that found value in the anonymous peer review of surgeons' procedures in helping them improve their skills.

  • Changes to Peer Review Program.
    Cheyne, Helen; Niven, Catherine; McGinley, Mary // California CPA; Jan/Feb2015, Vol. 83 Issue 7, p6 

    The article reports on the new concept paper of American Institute of Certified Public Accountant (AICPA) titled 'Evolving the CPA Profession's Peer Review Program for the Future,' for which its accepting public comments to improve peer reviews.

  • Why we need peer reviews….
    Swinson, Chris // Accountancy; Apr1985, Vol. 96 Issue 1100, p19 

    Examines the importance of peer reviews in the accounting profession. Review of a firm by fellow practitioners with similar experience of professional problems and not by faceless bureaucrats.

  • The Experience of being a Midwifery Standards Reviewer.
    Dockrill, Linda // Midwifery News; Jun2010, Issue 57, p40 

    A letter is presented from social worker Linda Dockrill to Norma in which she tendered her resignation as Midwifery Standards Reviewer (MSR).

  • Auditors Taking Our Own Advice--Part II.
    Hayes Jr., Arthur A. // Journal of Government Financial Management; Spring2012, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p54 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experiences of conducting audits and peer reviews.

  • Toledo teachers' union reinstates peer-review process.
    Lawton, Millicent // Education Week; 2/14/96, Vol. 15 Issue 21, p5 

    Reports that the Toledo Federation of Teachers in Ohio has reinstated the peer-review process that it has dropped in April 1995 due to a dispute with the school board. Features of the review program; Provisions of the union's negotiation with the school district.

  • The society of your peers.
    Lawton, Millicent // New Scientist; 6/17/95, Vol. 146 Issue 1982, p3 

    Editorial. Focuses on peer review of scientific research. Reason for peer review; Guidance from reviewers; Electronic publishing of research; Impact of electronic media.

  • The society of your peers.
    Lawton, Millicent // New Scientist; 6/17/95, Vol. 146 Issue 1982, p3 

    Editorial. Focuses on peer review of scientific research. Reason for peer review; Guidance from reviewers; Electronic publishing of research; Impact of electronic media.

  • Journal Articles.
    Organ, Phil // Podiatry Management; Nov/Dec2014, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p24 

    The article presents an answer to the question is medical malpractice or other related issues applicable to writing reviews of journal articles.

  • Mandatory peer review plans.
    Organ, Phil // Accountancy; Feb1987, Vol. 99 Issue 1122, p5 

    Reports that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is planning to impose mandatory peer reviews on all firms which audit publicly quoted companies. Exemption of auditing firms in Great Britain which audit British based companies registered in the U.S.; Reason for the withdrawal...

  • Scientists offer advice on how best to respond to reviewers.
    Woolston, Chris // Nature; 6/4/2015, Vol. 522 Issue 7554, p9 

    The article cites three blog posts that emphasize the importance of professional, constructive responses from authors whose papers had been reviewed by referees.

  • Guidelines for review of chief librarians.
    Nyren, Karl // Library Journal; 7/1/1985, Vol. 110 Issue 12, p19 

    Discusses the content of the revised edition of the guidelines for review of chief librarians in North America. Similarity between the procedures followed in the appointment of chief librarians and a faculty dean; Need for the participation of librarians; Separation of the status of the chief...

  • Supply and demand: Apply market forces to peer review.
    Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Nature; 2/20/2014, Vol. 506 Issue 7488, p295 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article, which discusses the application of market forces to peer review that was published in January 2014 issue.

  • From the blogosphere.
    Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Nature; 9/17/2009, Vol. 461 Issue 7262, p313 

    A blog about the criticisms against peer review is discussed.

    McManus, Dean A. // Journal of Geoscience Education; Nov2001, Vol. 49 Issue 5, p423 

    Presents a study which aimed to align the appropriate tools for peer review with the teaching implications of paradigm choice. Discussion on the two paradigms of education; Paradigm goals and assessment of results; Paradigm teaching methods and classroom environment.

  • Time for Revelation: Unmasking the Anonymity of Blind Reviewers.
    Agoramoorthy, Govindasamy // Science & Engineering Ethics; Feb2017, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p313 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Ensuring the quality, fairness and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors."

Previous 50 Results Next 50 Results
That might join me putting you to

Other Topics