Citations with the tag: PEER review (Professional performance)
Results 51 - 100
DAWES, C. // Journal of Dental Research; Dec1990, Vol. 69 Issue 12, p1867
A list of reviewers for the "Journal of Dental Research," is presented, including D. W. Allmann, L. Alvesalo and L. C. Anderson.
- Dazed and confused.
DAWES, C. // New Scientist; 4/13/2002, Vol. 174 Issue 2338, p3
Comments on the need for thorough investigation and clarification of research submitted to high-end journals. Citation of problems concerning peer reviews; Presentation of several flawed research; Call for the formation of an expert group in a specialized field.
- Promotability ratings: An underused promotion method for public safety organizations.
Cederblom, Douglas // Public Personnel Management; Spring91, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p27
Describes the use of promotability ratings as a promotion method for public safety organization officers in the United States. Options for the appraisal; Methods of rating by peers and higher-rank officers; Rating process.
- From the Blogosphere.
Cederblom, Douglas // Nature;
The article discusses a blog entry on the need for regulation and grading of peer reviewing activities.
- The Experience of being a Midwifery Standards Reviewer.
Dockrill, Linda // Midwifery News; Jun2010, Issue 57, p40
A letter is presented from social worker Linda Dockrill to Norma in which she tendered her resignation as Midwifery Standards Reviewer (MSR).
- Auditors Taking Our Own Advice--Part II.
Hayes Jr., Arthur A. // Journal of Government Financial Management; Spring2012, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p54
A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experiences of conducting audits and peer reviews.
- Trouble with peer review.
Rocha, Benedita // Nature Immunology; Apr2001, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p277
Scrutinizes the effects of peer review on scientific activities. Influences of peer review on publications, careers, and researchers' development of their lines of research; Responsibility of the scientific community over high quality peer review; View on peer review as an ideal scientific...
- Acknowledgement to reviewers 2002/2003.
Rocha, Benedita // Anatomy & Embryology; May2003, Vol. 206 Issue 6, p507
Presents a list of peer reviewers for the 2002 and 2003 issues of the journal "Anatomy & Embryology."
- From the Editor in Chief Jacqueline Maus Feldman.
Rocha, Benedita // Community Mental Health Journal;
People including Mohamed Sherif, Mohan Kumar, and Priya Balaji who the author would like to thank for their assistance in the creation of the journal "Community Mental Health Journal" are mentioned.
- Thank You ...
Leonard, Bill // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache; Nov2009, Vol. 71 Issue 9, p518
The article list individuals who peer-reviewed manuscripts submitted to the journal in 2009.
Leonard, Bill // Nature; 6/5/2008, Vol. 453 Issue 7196, p711
A correction to the article "Working double-blind" that was published in the previous issue is presented.
- 2013 Reviewers.
Leonard, Bill // Journal of Nursing Education; Jan2014, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p5
The article presents a list of reviewers such as Jean M. Klein, Linda C. Andrist, and Mollie E. Aleshire who, between December 11, 2012 and December 15, 2013, contributed to the revision of manuscripts published in the journal.
- Peer review, unmasked.
Gura, Trisha // Nature; 3/21/2002, Vol. 416 Issue 6878, p259
Focuses on the advantages of 'open' peer review technique in Germany. Evaluation of scientific papers; Comments given by various scientists; Avoidance of technical errors.
- When should case be sent for external peer review?
Gura, Trisha // Hospital Peer Review; Jul2007, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p94
The article questions the objectivity of the internal review process in hospitals and considers the merits and obstacles to an external review.
- Use objective criteria for external review.
Gura, Trisha // Hospital Peer Review; Jul2007, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p100
This article offers a look at factors to consider in developing a criteria for a hospital's external peer review process.
- Turn peer reviews into learning occasions.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Jul2007, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p101
The article emphasizes the need for health care practitioners to share lessons learned during peer review of issues that lead to misdiagnoses, report discrepancies and untoward events through meetings or round table discussions.
- Meeting more explicit peer review imperatives.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Aug2007, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p111
The article focuses on the 2007 U.S. Joint Commission (TJC) Medical Staff Standards which reinforce the need for an ongoing, objective, and fact-based process for physician peer review.
- Avoid charges that peer review is malicious.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p123
The article discusses how hospitals can avoid charges that their peer review of medical staff is malicious.
- CNE questions.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p126
A quiz about hospital peer review is presented.
- Surveyors share three best practice ideas.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p127
The article discusses the best practice ideas for peer review at the Newport Hospital in Rhode Island.
- Use patient satisfaction data for improvement.
Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Dec2010, Vol. 35 Issue 12, p1
A subject index for the December 2010 issue of "Hospital Peer Review" is presented.
- Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Nature; 2/13/2003, Vol. 421 Issue 6924, p689
Responds to M.H. Dominiczak's comments on peer review process in Correspondence. Factors that contribute to improve the quality of reviews; Quality of the journals and the frequency of reviews; Proposal to improve the quality and status of reviewing.
- From the blogosphere.
Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Nature; 9/17/2009, Vol. 461 Issue 7262, p313
A blog about the criticisms against peer review is discussed.
- Journal of Business and Retail Management Research.
Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Journal of Business & Retail Management Research; Apr2013, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p152
The article offers information on the journal and provides its scope, formal conditions of acceptance, peer review process and manuscript submission procedures.
- 2013 Reviewers of the Year.
Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Environmental Health Perspectives; Feb2014, Vol. 122 Issue 2, pA37
The article reports on top Reviewers of the Year 2013 recognized by the periodical including John Balmes, Daniel Axelrad, and Joe Braun who received high ratings from the Associate Editors for quality and timeliness of reviews and each completed minimum of five reviews in 2013.
- Mathematics: Does the proof stack up?
Szpiro, George // Nature; 7/3/2003, Vol. 424 Issue 6944, p12
Focuses on a peer review conducted on a mathematician's paper on the arrangement of spheres. Use of computers in mathematics; Computer-aided proofs; Correctness of the proof.
- Supply and demand: Apply market forces to peer review.
Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Nature; 2/20/2014, Vol. 506 Issue 7488, p295
A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article, which discusses the application of market forces to peer review that was published in January 2014 issue.
- Thank you to the Journal's Reviewers in 2000.
Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry; Feb2001, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p23
Editorial. Lists reviewers of 'The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry' in 2000.
- New opportunities through PAR.
Moir, Ellen; Bloom, Gary // Thrust for Educational Leadership; Jan/Feb2000, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p12
Focuses on the benefits from peer assistance and review program for teachers initiated by the state of California. Program as a catalyst for change in labor relations; Alignment of teacher development with standards; Program as a new paradigm in labor-management relationships. INSET: Teaching...
Serb, Chris // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks; 05/20/97, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p17
Cites the award received by Peer Review Organization for encouraging other health care providers services for Medicare beneficiaries. Projects done by the organization.
- Beware the jury of peers.
Watson, Traci // U.S. News & World Report; 06/02/97, Vol. 122 Issue 21, p14
Discusses the practice of peer review among scientists, used to decide whether scientists get government grants and to weigh which articles should run in scientific journals. Allegations of sexism and cronyism among the peer reviews; How most scientists feel about peer review.
- Acknowledgment of Peer Reviewers for 2006.
Watson, Traci // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Audiology; Nov2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p154
The section acknowledges several reviewers who have reviewed manuscripts for the journal from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
- The Power of Peer Reviews.
Galus, Pamela // Science Teacher; Mar2002, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p70
Focuses on the importance of the peer review process in teaching. Commonality of peer review practice in schools; Experience of the author on peer reviews; Effectiveness of teaching.
- Guidelines for review of chief librarians.
Nyren, Karl // Library Journal; 7/1/1985, Vol. 110 Issue 12, p19
Discusses the content of the revised edition of the guidelines for review of chief librarians in North America. Similarity between the procedures followed in the appointment of chief librarians and a faculty dean; Need for the participation of librarians; Separation of the status of the chief...
- Letter from the Editor.
Couch, George N. // Forest Products Journal; Sep2008, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p4
The article unveils that the feature article in the September 2008 issue of the journal underwent a peer-review process, and reports on the resignation of Executive Vice President Carol Lewis.
- Technology transfer embodies approach to disability.
Albertson, David // Employee Benefit News; Jan1999, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p47
Presents information on the Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health in Hopkinton, Massachusetts. Mission of the center; Information on the peer review process at the center; Technological features at the center.
- USING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HEALTH EDUCATOR TO RATE JOURNALS IN THE FIELD.
Donahue, Roberta E.; Fitzhugh, Eugene; Boling, Whitney; Eddy, James M.; Leaver-Dunn, Deidre; Abbott, Rachel L.; Carter, Tracy M.; Chancy, J. Don; Childress, Ronda; Lewis, Melvin; Murphey, Patti A.; Filoromo, Camille; Strasse, Sheri; Hardy, Marci L.; Notaro, Stephen J.; O'Rourke,, Thomas; Watts, Graham // American Journal of Health Studies; 2002, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1
Little is known about the coverage of health education responsibilities in peer-reviewed literature. Abstracts (n= 17,391) from one hundred health education related journals were reviewed and compared to the entry and graduate level responsibilities of health educators. Journals were ranked by...
- Peer consultation group: Doing what works for counselors.
Logan, Wendy Lee // Professional School Counseling; Dec97 Special Issue, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p4
Presents a study on peer consultation group. Background of the study; Benefit of peer consultation group; Objectives of peer consultation group; Details on the processes involved; Components of the peer evaluation group.
- Peer Group Clinical Supervision Program Fosters Confidence and Professionalism.
Agnew, Tom; Vaught, Claire Cole; Getz, Hildy G.; Fortune, Jimmie // Professional School Counseling; Oct2000, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p6
Discusses the effects of clinical supervision on school counselors. Changes in the role and functions of school counselors; Call for school systems to design and examine methods of school counselor supervision; Model of supervision process of each peer group; Observation of positive counseling...
- Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review.
van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Oct99, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p622
The objectives of this study were to see whether, in the opinion of authors, blinding or unmasking or a combination of the two affects the quality of reviews and to compare authors' and editors' assessments. In a trial conducted in the British Medical Journal , 527 consecutive manuscripts were...
- Medical Students' Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism.
van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Sep2005, Vol. 20 Issue 9, pA-3
Presents an abstract for the article "Medical Students' Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism" published in the September 2005 issue of the "Journal of Internal Medicine."
- Audiologic Assessment Document Available for Peer Review.
van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // ASHA Leader; 8/3/2004, Vol. 9 Issue 14, p14
Focuses on the availability of the Audiologic Assessment of Children from Birth Through 5 Years of Age: Guidelines for peer review. Members of the group; Emphasis on universal early detection of infants with hearing loss; Scope of the document.
- Medical Publishing: The Future.
Dorion, Dominique // Journal of Otolaryngology; May2001 Supplement 1, Vol. 30, p47
Discusses the future of the publication of clinical papers. Use of electronic communication; Globalization of information posting and exchange; Benefits of using repositories for scientific community; Changes in peer review process.
- QUALITY IS NO SECRET.
Dorion, Dominique // CPA Journal; Oct2000, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p8
Provides strategies for a successful peer review of accounting firms. Right attitude toward peer reviews; Benefits of the strategies.
- Lack of Transparency in Peer Review.
Crystal, Mel // CPA Journal; Jan2011, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p15
No abstract available.
- Perception and Acceptance of Evaluations by Supervisors and Peers.
Stubblebine, Patrick C. // Current Psychology; Spring2001, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p85
A survey of 200 employed graduate and undergraduate business students investigated differences in individuals' acceptance and perceptions about peer evaluation vs. supervisor evaluation. Results showed that, compared to peer evaluations, acceptance of supervisor evaluations is higher, supervisor...
- Peer evaluation: IT'S NOT JUST FOR TEACHERS.
Gil, Libia S. // Leadership; May/Jun2001, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p12
Reports the evaluation system to principals leadership performance with peer group evaluation. Importance of ongoing and open communication; Description to the peer evaluation process; Purpose of the evaluation process. INSET: Sail the seven 'Cs'--without leaving your..., by Glen Thomas..
- Principals and teachers unite: A team approach to supervision and evaluation.
Ellermeyer, Deborah // Journal of Instructional Psychology; Sep92, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p161
Discusses the advantages and disadvantages of peer evaluation for assessing school teachers' performance. Limitations of supervisory assessment of teachers' capabilities; Factors need for evaluating teachers' behaviors for instructional purposes.
- Peer reviews affect the teaching culture of an institution.
Ellermeyer, Deborah // Journal of Instructional Psychology; Mar96, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p8
Cites the report `Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching,' published by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education at the George Washington University. Effect of peer reviews on the teaching culture of an institution.
- Hospital privileges under attack? Fight back--carefully.
Sullivan, Robert J. // Medical Economics; 12/22/97, Vol. 74 Issue 25, p32
Provides information on how physicians can minimize their potential for peer review actions, which can ruin their profession and threaten their license to practice. Which sector is the center of this trend; Some of the most common mistakes made by physicians; Episodes that can damage a doctor's...