Citations with the tag: PEER review (Professional performance)

Results 51 - 100

  • Use objective criteria for external review.
     // Hospital Peer Review; Jul2007, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p100 

    This article offers a look at factors to consider in developing a criteria for a hospital's external peer review process.

  • Turn peer reviews into learning occasions.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Jul2007, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p101 

    The article emphasizes the need for health care practitioners to share lessons learned during peer review of issues that lead to misdiagnoses, report discrepancies and untoward events through meetings or round table discussions.

  • Meeting more explicit peer review imperatives.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Aug2007, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p111 

    The article focuses on the 2007 U.S. Joint Commission (TJC) Medical Staff Standards which reinforce the need for an ongoing, objective, and fact-based process for physician peer review.

  • Avoid charges that peer review is malicious.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p123 

    The article discusses how hospitals can avoid charges that their peer review of medical staff is malicious.

  • CNE questions.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p126 

    A quiz about hospital peer review is presented.

  • Surveyors share three best practice ideas.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Sep2008, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p127 

    The article discusses the best practice ideas for peer review at the Newport Hospital in Rhode Island.

  • Use patient satisfaction data for improvement.
    Spath, Patrice // Hospital Peer Review; Dec2010, Vol. 35 Issue 12, p1 

    A subject index for the December 2010 issue of "Hospital Peer Review" is presented.

  • Journal of Business and Retail Management Research.
    Spath, Patrice // Journal of Business & Retail Management Research; Apr2013, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p152 

    The article offers information on the journal and provides its scope, formal conditions of acceptance, peer review process and manuscript submission procedures.

  • Mathematics: Does the proof stack up?
    Szpiro, George // Nature; 7/3/2003, Vol. 424 Issue 6944, p12 

    Focuses on a peer review conducted on a mathematician's paper on the arrangement of spheres. Use of computers in mathematics; Computer-aided proofs; Correctness of the proof.

  • New opportunities through PAR.
    Moir, Ellen; Bloom, Gary // Thrust for Educational Leadership; Jan/Feb2000, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p12 

    Focuses on the benefits from peer assistance and review program for teachers initiated by the state of California. Program as a catalyst for change in labor relations; Alignment of teacher development with standards; Program as a new paradigm in labor-management relationships. INSET: Teaching...

  • Medicare/medicaid.
    Serb, Chris // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks; 05/20/97, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p17 

    Cites the award received by Peer Review Organization for encouraging other health care providers services for Medicare beneficiaries. Projects done by the organization.

  • Acknowledgment of Peer Reviewers for 2006.
    Serb, Chris // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Audiology; Nov2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p154 

    The section acknowledges several reviewers who have reviewed manuscripts for the journal from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

  • The Power of Peer Reviews.
    Galus, Pamela // Science Teacher; Mar2002, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p70 

    Focuses on the importance of the peer review process in teaching. Commonality of peer review practice in schools; Experience of the author on peer reviews; Effectiveness of teaching.

  • Anonymously avoiding egos.
    Galus, Pamela // Industrial Engineer: IE; Aug2014, Vol. 46 Issue 8, p13 

    The article briefly describes a study conducted by researchers at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) that found value in the anonymous peer review of surgeons' procedures in helping them improve their skills.

  • Note of Appreciation / Note de Reconnaissance.
    Galus, Pamela // Canadian Journal of Forest Research; Dec2008, Vol. 38 Issue 12, piii 

    The article lists referees who reviewed manuscripts for this issue.

  • Dazed and confused.
    Galus, Pamela // New Scientist; 4/13/2002, Vol. 174 Issue 2338, p3 

    Comments on the need for thorough investigation and clarification of research submitted to high-end journals. Citation of problems concerning peer reviews; Presentation of several flawed research; Call for the formation of an expert group in a specialized field.

  • Preface of Editor in Chief.
    Hosseini, Ahmad // Cell Journal (Yakhteh); Winter2010, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p438 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editor discusses peer review as an important part of high quality scientific research in cellular and molecular related topics.

  • ASSESSMENT OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION PRACTICE: RESULTS OF A NETWORK-WIDE PEER REVIEW AUDIT ASSESSMENT.
    Hosseini, Ahmad // Heart; Jul2008 Supp, Vol. 94, pA25 

    Presents an abstract to the article "Assessment of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Practice: Results of a Network-Wide Peer Review Audit Assessment," by G. F. Dixon, I. Blows, and S. Holmberg.

  • The society of your peers.
    Hosseini, Ahmad // New Scientist; 6/17/95, Vol. 146 Issue 1982, p3 

    Editorial. Focuses on peer review of scientific research. Reason for peer review; Guidance from reviewers; Electronic publishing of research; Impact of electronic media.

  • Does Editorial Peer Review Work?
    Lock, Stephen // Annals of Internal Medicine; 7/1/94, Vol. 121 Issue 1, p60 

    Focuses on various issues related to editorial peer review. Common concerns about editorial peer review; Comments on the masking study; Role of editors in helping peer reviewers.

  • Pros and cons of open peer review.
    Lock, Stephen // Nature Neuroscience; Mar1999, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p197 

    Editorial. Examines the advantages and disadvantages of open peer review in the field of neuroscience. Primary role of review process; Bias against female applicants in grant review; Conflicts of interest.

  • Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
    Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Nature; 2/13/2003, Vol. 421 Issue 6924, p689 

    Responds to M.H. Dominiczak's comments on peer review process in Correspondence. Factors that contribute to improve the quality of reviews; Quality of the journals and the frequency of reviews; Proposal to improve the quality and status of reviewing.

  • Acknowledgement to reviewers 2002/2003.
    Clausen, Torben; Nielsen, Ole Bakgaard // Anatomy & Embryology; May2003, Vol. 206 Issue 6, p507 

    Presents a list of peer reviewers for the 2002 and 2003 issues of the journal "Anatomy & Embryology."

  • Beware the jury of peers.
    Watson, Traci // U.S. News & World Report; 06/02/97, Vol. 122 Issue 21, p14 

    Discusses the practice of peer review among scientists, used to decide whether scientists get government grants and to weigh which articles should run in scientific journals. Allegations of sexism and cronyism among the peer reviews; How most scientists feel about peer review.

  • Thank you to the Journal's Reviewers in 2000.
    Watson, Traci // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry; Feb2001, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p23 

    Editorial. Lists reviewers of 'The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry' in 2000.

  • From the blogosphere.
    Watson, Traci // Nature; 9/17/2009, Vol. 461 Issue 7262, p313 

    A blog about the criticisms against peer review is discussed.

  • From the Editor in Chief Jacqueline Maus Feldman.
    Watson, Traci // Community Mental Health Journal; Dec2013, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p857 

    People including Mohamed Sherif, Mohan Kumar, and Priya Balaji who the author would like to thank for their assistance in the creation of the journal "Community Mental Health Journal" are mentioned.

  • Supply and demand: Apply market forces to peer review.
    Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Nature; 2/20/2014, Vol. 506 Issue 7488, p295 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article, which discusses the application of market forces to peer review that was published in January 2014 issue.

  • Mandatory peer review plans.
    Ott, Sascha; Hebenstreit, Daniel // Accountancy; Feb1987, Vol. 99 Issue 1122, p5 

    Reports that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is planning to impose mandatory peer reviews on all firms which audit publicly quoted companies. Exemption of auditing firms in Great Britain which audit British based companies registered in the U.S.; Reason for the withdrawal...

  • More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?
    Klein, John R. // Nature Immunology; Oct2001, Vol. 2 Issue 10, p892 

    Presents an article by Benedicta Rocha which provides suggestions for improving the peer review process. Opportunity for anonymous work evaluation of investigators; Provision of details of the authors and their affiliated institutions upon their request; Advantages and disadvantages of...

  • Acknowledgment.
    Klein, John R. // Modern Rheumatology (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.); Dec2008, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p651 

    People that the editor-in-chief and members of the Editorial Board would like to thank for their assistance in their peer reviews during 2008 are mentioned including AKira Hashiramoto of Kobe University, Hideto Akama of Eisai Co. Ltd., and Takao Fujii of Kyoto University.

  • Editorial.
    DAWES, C. // Journal of Dental Research; Dec1990, Vol. 69 Issue 12, p1867 

    A list of reviewers for the "Journal of Dental Research," is presented, including D. W. Allmann, L. Alvesalo and L. C. Anderson.

  • 2013 Reviewers.
    DAWES, C. // Journal of Nursing Education; Jan2014, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p5 

    The article presents a list of reviewers such as Jean M. Klein, Linda C. Andrist, and Mollie E. Aleshire who, between December 11, 2012 and December 15, 2013, contributed to the revision of manuscripts published in the journal.

  • Thank You ...
    Leonard, Bill // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache; Nov2009, Vol. 71 Issue 9, p518 

    The article list individuals who peer-reviewed manuscripts submitted to the journal in 2009.

  • Guidelines for review of chief librarians.
    Nyren, Karl // Library Journal; 7/1/1985, Vol. 110 Issue 12, p19 

    Discusses the content of the revised edition of the guidelines for review of chief librarians in North America. Similarity between the procedures followed in the appointment of chief librarians and a faculty dean; Need for the participation of librarians; Separation of the status of the chief...

  • From the Blogosphere.
    Nyren, Karl // Nature; 4/23/2009, Vol. 458 Issue 7241, p944 

    The article discusses a blog entry on the need for regulation and grading of peer reviewing activities.

  • Are we being true to the peer-review process?
    El-Masri, Maher M. // Nurse Researcher; 2011, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p92 

    The author emphasizes the responsibility of editors, reviewers and authors to ensure that peer reviews of manuscripts in the field of nursing that are submitted for publication are as rigorous and meaningful as possible. He describes the responsibility of editors to make sure that the reviewers...

  • Correction.
    El-Masri, Maher M. // Nature; 6/5/2008, Vol. 453 Issue 7196, p711 

    A correction to the article "Working double-blind" that was published in the previous issue is presented.

  • 2013 Reviewers of the Year.
    El-Masri, Maher M. // Environmental Health Perspectives; Feb2014, Vol. 122 Issue 2, pA37 

    The article reports on top Reviewers of the Year 2013 recognized by the periodical including John Balmes, Daniel Axelrad, and Joe Braun who received high ratings from the Associate Editors for quality and timeliness of reviews and each completed minimum of five reviews in 2013.

  • Letter from the Editor.
    Couch, George N. // Forest Products Journal; Sep2008, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p4 

    The article unveils that the feature article in the September 2008 issue of the journal underwent a peer-review process, and reports on the resignation of Executive Vice President Carol Lewis.

  • Technology transfer embodies approach to disability.
    Albertson, David // Employee Benefit News; Jan1999, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p47 

    Presents information on the Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health in Hopkinton, Massachusetts. Mission of the center; Information on the peer review process at the center; Technological features at the center.

  • USING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HEALTH EDUCATOR TO RATE JOURNALS IN THE FIELD.
    Donahue, Roberta E.; Fitzhugh, Eugene; Boling, Whitney; Eddy, James M.; Leaver-Dunn, Deidre; Abbott, Rachel L.; Carter, Tracy M.; Chancy, J. Don; Childress, Ronda; Lewis, Melvin; Murphey, Patti A.; Filoromo, Camille; Strasse, Sheri; Hardy, Marci L.; Notaro, Stephen J.; O'Rourke,, Thomas; Watts, Graham // American Journal of Health Studies; 2002, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1 

    Little is known about the coverage of health education responsibilities in peer-reviewed literature. Abstracts (n= 17,391) from one hundred health education related journals were reviewed and compared to the entry and graduate level responsibilities of health educators. Journals were ranked by...

  • Peer consultation group: Doing what works for counselors.
    Logan, Wendy Lee // Professional School Counseling; Dec97 Special Issue, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p4 

    Presents a study on peer consultation group. Background of the study; Benefit of peer consultation group; Objectives of peer consultation group; Details on the processes involved; Components of the peer evaluation group.

  • Peer Group Clinical Supervision Program Fosters Confidence and Professionalism.
    Agnew, Tom; Vaught, Claire Cole; Getz, Hildy G.; Fortune, Jimmie // Professional School Counseling; Oct2000, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p6 

    Discusses the effects of clinical supervision on school counselors. Changes in the role and functions of school counselors; Call for school systems to design and examine methods of school counselor supervision; Model of supervision process of each peer group; Observation of positive counseling...

  • Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review.
    van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Oct99, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p622 

    The objectives of this study were to see whether, in the opinion of authors, blinding or unmasking or a combination of the two affects the quality of reviews and to compare authors' and editors' assessments. In a trial conducted in the British Medical Journal , 527 consecutive manuscripts were...

  • Medical Students' Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism.
    van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Sep2005, Vol. 20 Issue 9, pA-3 

    Presents an abstract for the article "Medical Students' Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism" published in the September 2005 issue of the "Journal of Internal Medicine."

  • Audiologic Assessment Document Available for Peer Review.
    van Rooyen, Susan; Godlee, Fiona; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Richard; Black, Nick // ASHA Leader; 8/3/2004, Vol. 9 Issue 14, p14 

    Focuses on the availability of the Audiologic Assessment of Children from Birth Through 5 Years of Age: Guidelines for peer review. Members of the group; Emphasis on universal early detection of infants with hearing loss; Scope of the document.

  • Medical Publishing: The Future.
    Dorion, Dominique // Journal of Otolaryngology; May2001 Supplement 1, Vol. 30, p47 

    Discusses the future of the publication of clinical papers. Use of electronic communication; Globalization of information posting and exchange; Benefits of using repositories for scientific community; Changes in peer review process.

  • QUALITY IS NO SECRET.
    Dorion, Dominique // CPA Journal; Oct2000, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p8 

    Provides strategies for a successful peer review of accounting firms. Right attitude toward peer reviews; Benefits of the strategies.

  • Lack of Transparency in Peer Review.
    Crystal, Mel // CPA Journal; Jan2011, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p15 

    No abstract available.

Previous 50 Results Next 50 Results
Share

Other Topics