TITLE

BYRON WHITE—HERO AND SCHOLAR: REFLECTIONS ABOUT PUNISHMENT, POLITICAL SPEECH, AND PUBLIC LIABILITY

AUTHOR(S)
STEVENS, JOHN PAUL
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
University of Colorado Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 84 Issue 4, p893
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Speech
ABSTRACT
The article presents a speech by retired U.S. Supreme Court (USSC) Justice John Paul Stevens which was delivered as the first Annual John Paul Stevens Lecture at the University of Colorado Law School on September 22, 2011. Stevens discusses various topics including the life and career of former USSC Justice Byron White, punishment in the U.S., and the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Several USSC cases are examined, including Furman v. Georgia.
ACCESSION #
89620215

 

Related Articles

  • OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY. FLETCHER, WILLIAM A. // New York University Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p805 

    The article presents a speech entitled "Our Broken Death Penalty" by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher which was delivered as the James Madison Lecture at the New York University School of Law on October 15, 2013. According to the article, the U.S. Supreme...

  • LESSONS FOR LAW REFORM FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. STEIKER, CAROL S.; STEIKER, JORDAN M. // Southern California Law Review;Mar2014, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p733 

    The article discusses American law reform efforts in relation to the nation's capital punishment laws as of March 2014, focusing on the claim that the U.S. is the only Western democracy that still retains a death penalty punishment. America's rule-of-law values, alleged racial disparities in the...

  • A Reflection on Furman. Higginbotham, Patrick E. // American Journal of Criminal Law;Spring2007, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p199 

    The author ponders on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia, which ruled on the requirement for a degree of consistency in the application of the death penalty. He believes death penalty generates interest in the coverage of federal review of state criminal convictions. He...

  • THE MARSHALL HYPOTHESIS AND THE RISE OF ANTI-DEATH PENALTY JUDGES. AARONS, DWIGHT // Tennessee Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p381 

    In this article, the author comments on law student Crystal Enekwa's article on capital punishment and Marshall Hypothesis, a belief of former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall who supports that the death penalty comes from a lack of knowledge about it. It explains Marshall's...

  • What One Hand Giveth, The Other Taketh Away: How Future Dangerousness Corrupts Guilt Verdicts and Produces Premature Punishment Decisions in Capital Cases. Vartkessian, Elizabeth S. // Pace Law Review;Mar2012, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p447 

    The article discusses capital punishment litigation in the U.S. as of March 2012, focusing on future dangerousness assessments and their impact on the judicial decisionmaking process and determinations of guilt. Bifurcated capital punishment trials are addressed, along with an examination of...

  • TRYING TO GET IT RIGHT--OHIO, FROM THE EIGHTIES TO THE TEENS. Koosed, Margery M. // Hofstra Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p783 

    The article discusses the history of the capital punishment (CP) laws and litigation in Ohio as of 2015, and it mentions the Ohio Supreme Court, scrutiny of the state's CP system, and the claim that Texas and Ohio have performed the most executions in America. Justice is addressed in relation to...

  • STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. FARRELL, IAN P. // Florida State University Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p853 

    The article discusses the strict scrutiny standard of judicial review in relation to the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as of July 2013, focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court (USSC) and legal protections against cruel and unusual punishment in America. The USSC's reported reliance on...

  • Furman v. Georgia.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Furman v. Georgia argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by the judges.

  • DESERVING OF LIFE: A MITIGATING FACTOR APPROACH TO THE NARROWING MANDATE IN CAPITAL SENTENCING. WANG, ANDY T. // Harvard Journal on Legislation;2015, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p509 

    The article explores a new legislative but court-driven approach to death penalty narrowing in the U.S. Topics discussed include decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in several cases related to capital punishment including Furman v. Georgia, Gregg v. Georgia and McGautha v. California, use of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics