MILITARY PERSONNEL: Comparisons between Military and Civilian Compensation Can be Useful, but Data Limitations Prevent Exact Comparisons

Farrell, Brenda S.
April 2010
GAO Reports;4/28/2010, preceding p1
Government Documents
The article presents a speech by U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Director of Defense Capabilities and Management Brenda S. Farrell, delivered at the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Personnel, Committee on Armed Services, in which she discussed the comparison of compensation benefits between military and civilian personnel, as well as data limitations that prevent its accurate association.


Related Articles

  • Why one adviser is demanding action on military pensions.  // Money Marketing (Online Edition);11/18/2013, p8 

    A blog on disadvantages faced by the armed forces community in comparison to other citizens and denial of employment rights and pension to the Armed Forces of Great Britain is presented.

  • A PRIMER ON VETERANS' REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS.  // Bankers Letter of the Law;Nov2011, Vol. 45 Issue 11, p1 

    The article discusses the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) which allows former service members to be reinstated in his place of work after his duty in the military service. Service members should submit an application letter within 90 days after his completion...

  • Veterans Benefits Administration: Better Collection and Analysis of Attrition Data Needed to Enhance Workforce Planning: GAO-03-491.  // GAO Reports;4/28/2003, p1 

    By the year 2006, the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) projects it will lose a significant portion of its mission-critical workforce to retirement. VBA has hired over 2,000 new employees to begin to fill this expected gap. GAO was asked to review: (1) the attrition rate at VBA,...

  • The Bonus Issue Following World War. Britain, Great // Congressional Digest;June22, Vol. 1 Issue 9, p6 

    British Army's gratuity or bonus payments related to the World War I totaled £114,000,000 or £542,640,000. Great Britain was actually engaged in the war for a period of 4 years, 3 months and 7 days. Privates with a minimum of a month's service or less got 5 pounds if any portion of this...

  • Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2004 Creates Additional Responsibilities for Employers. Greenberg, Richard I.; Stanton, Diane E. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2004, which offers reemployment protection and other benefits for veterans and military services employees in the U.S. It requires employers to extend the period for continuation of health care coverage and obliges them to provide...

  • Will It Require Special Taxation? Yes. Mellon, Andrew W. // Congressional Digest;June22, Vol. 1 Issue 9, p9 

    According to the author, whatever form U.S. soldiers' bonus may take, it would cost from $300,000,000 to $400,000,000 for the next 3 to 4 years, and may involve continuing liabilities thereafter of over $200,000,000 a year until 1943. It is impossible to avoid the cost if a bonus is to be...

  • Human Capital: Complete Information and More Analyses Needed to Enhance DOD's Civilian Senior Leader Strategic Workforce Plan. Farrell, Brenda S. // GAO Reports;9/19/2012, p1 

    A letter by Ms. Brenda S. Farrell, Director of Defense Capabilities and Management, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), addressed to the U.S. Congressional Committees, is presented. It discusses GAO's report on the Department of Defense's (DOD) Civilian Senior Leader Strategic Workforce...

  • Old Soldiers Never go Broke.  // National Review;4/19/1985, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p15 

    Focuses on the military pension in the U.S. Formula for the computation of the pension; Estimation that by 1989 the cost of the pensions will be equivalent to the entire defense budget of Great Britain; Proposals to reform the structure of the military pension system.

  • After-War Wages.  // America;11/30/1918, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p185 

    The article discusses the components and status of the fringe benefits of the American soldiers in the U.S. It views that the continuing price increase in some of primary commodities in the market, doubling of wages may not show improvement in the cost of living of the American workers...


Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics