TITLE

AN AMERICAN AMENDMENT

AUTHOR(S)
Rosenkranz, Nicholas Quinn
PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2009, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p475
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Speech
ABSTRACT
The article presents a speech delivered at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention in 2007, which discussed the problem on foreign citations, the preference for foreign law as a mechanism of amendment to U.S. constitution and a recommendation on an amendment that prohibits use of foreign law to interpret the constitution.
ACCESSION #
40625810

 

Related Articles

  • THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF OKLAHOMA'S SQ 755 AND OTHER PROVISIONS LIKE IT THAT BAR STATE COURTS FROM CONSIDERING INTERNATIONAL LAW. VENETIS, PENNY M. // Cleveland State Law Review;2011, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p189 

    The article discusses the unconstitutionality of State Question 755 (SQ 755) also known as the "Save Our State" amendment which forbids the application of Sharia Law or international laws by Oklahoma judiciary. It informs that SQ 755 violates the First Amendment's Establishment and Free Exercise...

  • International Law and US Courts: The Myth of Lohengrin Revisited. Bianchi, Andrea // European Journal of International Law;Sep2004, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p751 

    This paper attempts to shed light on the current attitude of US, courts towards international law. Regardless of the formal instruments of incorporation, the extent to which international law is used by courts within the formal constraints of constitutional provisions largely depends on the...

  • THE CULT OF CONSTITUTIONALISM. Albert, Richard // Florida State University Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p373 

    Constitutionalism compels and constrains all dimensions of our everyday lives in ways large and small that we often do not fully appreciate--perhaps because constitutions take many forms that we do not generally associate with constitutionalism. From the arts, sports, trade, entertainment,...

  • Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law. Vermeule, Adrian // Yale Law Journal;Nov2001, Vol. 111 Issue 2, p399 

    Focuses on rules in the United States Constitution which may be analyzed as veil rules, or rules that suppress self-interested behavior on the part of decisionmakers. Difference of a veil rule from other types of constitutional rules that restrict self-interested decisionmaking; Features of...

  • The Original 7 Articles.  // World Almanac & Book of Facts;2008, p497 

    An excerpt from the pocket-size edition of the U.S. Constitution published by the U.S. Government Printing Office is presented.

  • Honoring Constitution Week.  // Malakoff News (TX);9/21/2007, Vol. 98 Issue 38, p7B 

    The article focuses on the tradition of celebrating Constitution Week in the U.S.

  • The Authority of the Framers of the Constitution: Can Originalist Interpretation Be Justified? Simon, Larry G. // California Law Review;Oct85, Vol. 73 Issue 5, p1482 

    Examines the arguments for originalism, the group of claims promoting the use of the intent of framers, drafters and adopters of the U.S. Constitution in interpreting the Constitution. Discussion of the judicial function on statutory construction; Comparison between abstract intention theories...

  • Treaties' End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United States. Hathaway, Oona A. // Yale Law Journal;May2008, Vol. 117 Issue 7, p1236 

    Nearly every international agreement that is made through the Treaty Clause should be approved by both houses of Congress as a congressional-executive agreement instead. In making this case, this Article examines U.S. international lawmaking through empirical, comparative, historical, and policy...

  • THE LAW OF NATIONS AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Bellia Jr., Anthony J.; Clark, Bradford R. // Virginia Law Review;Jun2012, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p729 

    COURTS and scholars continue to debate the status of customary international law in US. courts, but have paid insufficient attention to the role that such law plays in interpreting and upholding several specific provisions of the Constitution. The modern position argues that courts should treat...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics