Hancock Jr., Stewart F.
August 2004
Albany Law Review;2004, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p81
Academic Journal
Presents the Hugh R. Jones Memorial Lecture of Judge Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., delivered at the Albany Law School, New York on March 29, 2004. Advice to his students when they are analyzing a problem; Terms which generally describe the mode of decision-making employed by most judges; Attributes of fairness which have guided the course of Anglo-American common law in its development.


Related Articles

  • Keeping It Private. Schwarzschild, Maimon // San Diego Law Review;Summer2007, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p677 

    The article focuses on the reasons leading to the treatment of private law cases under common law principles, by the judges of English speaking countries. It reports that the judges do not promote the vision of human rights and justice through private law decisions, as they do in public law...

  • Promoting Public Confidence in the Regulation of Judicial Conduct: A Survey of Recent Developments and Practices in Four Common Law Countries. Cravens, Sarah M. R. // McGeorge Law Review;Jan2011, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p177 

    The article offers information on the developments and practices of several common law countries which address the judicial conduct regulation in the promotion of public confidence. It says that judges play the role in the judicial decision making and exercise judgment and aims to gain public...

  • JUSTICE BLACKSTONE'S COMMON LAW ORTHODOXY. Kadens, Emily // Northwestern University Law Review;Fall2009, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p1553 

    The article defines and describes the common law orthodoxy and its expression in William Blackstone's "Commentaries on the Laws of England." Blackstone's view of law and work is explained which shows his lack of socialization into the pragmatic ethos of common lawyers. Also discussed are the...

  • The expert witness problem. Gray, Peter R. A. // International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law;2010, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p201 

    Judges in civil cases in common law courts need expert witnesses to resolve many issues, but distrust those experts. he distrust is partly due to judicial ignorance and partly to the perception that expert witnesses are beholden to their clients. Partisanship is a product of the common law...

  • Disenfranchising Black voters in slow motion. Maddox Jr., Alton H. // New York Amsterdam News;7/17/2003, Vol. 94 Issue 29, p12 

    Former Mayor Edward I. Koch has publicly called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate judicial corruption in Brooklyn, New York City even though he concedes it is a statewide problem. The selling of judgeships, therefore, is not judicial corruption. It is a judicial custom....

  • From Principles to Rules: The Case for Statutory Rules Governing Aspects of Judicial Disqualification. HUGHES, JULA; BRYDEN, PHILIP // Osgoode Hall Law Journal;Summer2016, Vol. 53 Issue 3, preceding p853 

    The common law "reasonable apprehension of bias" test for judicial disqualification is highly fact- and contextspecific. While there are good reasons for this approach as a general proposition, it also gives rise to considerable uncertainty for both judges and litigants in considering whether or...

  • Laughing at the Gods: Great Judges and How They Made the Common Law. Van Praagh, Shauna // McGill Law Journal;Sep2013, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p211 

    The article reviews the book "Laughing at the Gods: Great Judges and How They Made the Common Law," by Allan C. Hutchinson.

  • Juries, Judges, and Corruption. Stan Hok-Wui Wong // Public Integrity;Spring2007, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p133 

    Earlier studies argue that British common law is correlated with lower levels of perceived corruption. But the common law tradition is complex, and its various judicial institutions may have different effects on corruption. This article specifically examines how two judicial institutions--jury...

  • THE SHORT AND PUZZLING LIFE OF THE "IMPLICIT MINORITY DISCOUNT" IN DELAWARE APPRAISAL LAW. Hamermesh, Lawrence A.; Wachter, Michael L. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Nov2007, Vol. 156 Issue 1, p1 

    The author reflects the implicit minority discount (IMD), a fairly new concept in Delaware appraisal law. The author cites that the case law reveals it has emerged haphazardly and has not been fully tested against principles that are generally accepted in the financial community. The author adds...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics