Federal Mandates: Identification Process Is Complex and Federal Agency Roles Vary: GAO-05-401T

Williams, Orice M.
March 2005
GAO Reports;3/8/2005, p1
Government Document
The Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) was enacted to address concerns expressed by state and local governments about federal statutes and regulations that require nonfederal parties to expend resources to achieve legislative goals without being provided funding to cover the costs. Over the past 10 years, Congress has at various times considered legislation that would amend various aspects of UMRA. This testimony is based on GAO's report, Unfunded Mandates: Analysis of Reform Act Coverage (GAO-04-637, May 12, 2004). Specifically, this testimony addresses (1) the process used to identify federal mandates and what are federal agencies' roles, (2) statutes and rules that contained federal mandates under UMRA, and (3) statutes and rules that were not considered mandates under UMRA but may be perceived to be "unfunded mandates" by certain affected parties. GAO found that the identification and analysis of intergovernmental and private sector mandates is a complex process under UMRA. Proposed legislation and regulations are subject to various definitions, exclusions and exceptions before being identified as containing mandates at or above UMRA's cost thresholds. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is required to prepare statements identifying and estimating, if feasible, the costs of mandates in legislation. While a point of order can be raised on the floor of the House or Senate against consideration of any UMRA-covered intergovernmental mandate that lacks a CBO estimate or exceeds the cost thresholds, it contains no similar enforcement for private sector mandates. Conversely, federal agencies are required to prepare mandate statements for regulations containing intergovernmental or private sector mandates that would result in expenditures at or above the UMRA threshold. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, within the Office of Management and Budget, is responsible reviewing compliance with UMRA as part of the rule making process. In 2001 and 2002, 5 of 377 statutes enacted and 9 of 122 major or economically significant rules issued were identified as containing federal mandates at or above UMRA's thresholds. All 5 statutes and 9 rules contained private sector mandates as defined by UMRA. One final rule also contained an intergovernmental mandate. Despite the determinations under UMRA, at least 43 statutes and 65 rules issued in 2001 and 2002 resulted in new costs or negative financial consequences on nonfederal parties. These parties may perceive such statutes and rules as unfunded or underfunded mandates even though they did not meet UMRA's definition of a federal mandate at or above UMRA's thresholds. For 24 of the statutes and 26 of the rules, CBO or the agencies estimated that the direct costs or expenditures, as defined by UMRA, would not meet or exceed the applicable thresholds. The others were excluded for a variety of reasons stemming from exclusions or exceptions specified by UMRA.


Related Articles

  • Mandate relief becoming a reality.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;2/20/95 - 2/27/95, Vol. 6 Issue 21, p11 

    Reports on steps that were taken in an effort to relieve the burdens on local governments by unfunded federal and state mandates. House's introduction of a bill restricting federal government's ability to impose unfunded mandates; Senate's passage of a similar measure.

  • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: 1996 and beyond. Posner, Paul L. // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Spring97, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p53 

    Examines the implications of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act in the United States. Impact of the legislation on state and local governments; Reversion of existing mandates; Determination of the enactment of mandates.

  • Unfunded mandates can harm African-American communities.  // New York Amsterdam News;2/11/95, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p11 

    Focuses on the passing of the unfunded mandates legislation by the United States Congress. Definition of unfunded mandates; Legislation details; Federal statutes; Cost estimates.

  • Mandate watch.  // State Legislatures;Sept96, Vol. 22 Issue 8, The States' Advocate p4 

    Reports that the immigration bill, H.R. 2202, could impose more than one billion dollars in unfunded mandates on states. Ability of the National Conference of State Legislatures to highlight the costs to states of the immigration bill; Usefulness of the law to lobbyists for the states; Mandate...

  • Mandate relief: Reality or rhetoric. Bush, Susan // State Government News;May95, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p6 

    Assesses the effectiveness of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 in the United States. Problems on the growing list of federal mandates; Provisions under the federal mandate act; Effects of federal mandates on scarce tax dollars; Opinion of local leaders on the legislation. INSETS:...

  • Congress needs to cut mandates on private sector. Donohue, Thomas J. // Human Events;10/31/97, Vol. 53 Issue 41, p19 

    Comments on the importance of implementing laws cutting unfunded mandates for the private sector in the United States. Amendments needed for the 1995 Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; Action of the amendments to force Congress to realize the financial consequences of such tax mandates.

  • Threshold Rules for Funding Environmental Mandates: Accountability and the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act. Miceli, Thomas J.; Segerson, Kathleen // Land Economics;Aug99, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p375 

    Unfunded mandates are orders imposed by higher level governments on lower-level governments without providing the funds necessary for implementation. We highlight the following trade-off associated with unfunded mandates: on the one hand, no funding creates a risk of over-regulation by the...

  • The Mandate Hoax of 1995. Lund, Nelson // National Review;11/27/1995, Vol. 47 Issue 22, p52 

    This article criticizes the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 developed by the U.S. Congress. The complexity of UMRA prevented observers to see the flaws of the mandate. The legislation allows the opponents to demand a separate vote on the mandates while the bill is being examined by...

  • RE-ENTERING THE ARENA: RESTORING A JUDICIAL ROLE FOR ENFORCING LIMITS ON FEDERAL MANDATES. Eastman, John C. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2002, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p931 

    Examines the implementation and enactment of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 in the U.S. Information on the general principles of federalism; Provisions of the legislation; Discussion on the effectiveness of the provisions of the legislation.


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics