Federal Land Management: Additional Guidance on Community Involvement Could Enhance Effectiveness of Stewardship Contracting: GAO-04-652

Hill, Barry
June 2004
GAO Reports;6/14/2004, p1
Government Documents
In their efforts to reduce hazardous fuels and the risk of wildfire on the nation's public lands, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) expect that stewardship contracting will play a major role. Stewardship contracting involves the use of contracting authorities--such as the exchange of goods for services--first authorized in 1998 and intended to help the agencies achieve land management goals that meet community needs. GAO was asked, among other things, to determine (1) the contracting and financial controls the agencies use to ensure accountability in managing stewardship contracting projects and (2) the steps the agencies have taken to involve communities in the projects. Although the Forest Service provided limited initial guidance on establishing contracting and financial controls, the eight stewardship projects GAO visited had incorporated such controls. (BLM was first granted stewardship authority in 2003 and had no projects under way at the time of GAO's review.) The projects generally used pre- and post-award controls, such as reviews of contractor bids using preestablished criteria, and performance and payment bonds to ensure completion of required activities. GAO's review of selected financial controls at the projects we visited showed that they appeared to have procedures in place to account for retained receipts, including tracking funds received and expended, and had incorporated procedures designed to ensure the completion of specific work tasks before contractors were paid. Both the Forest Service and BLM issued guidance in January 2004 containing such controls for future projects. The Forest Service initially provided minimal guidance on soliciting and incorporating public involvement in stewardship contracting projects and, as a result, the type and extent of efforts to involve communities varied considerably among the projects GAO reviewed. However, managers who did not incorporate public input may have missed valuable opportunities to strengthen their projects. For example, one project manager said that public involvement led to more stringent criteria for protecting water quality, and another reported that public involvement improved agency access to public lands needing fuel reduction. Although most managers GAO spoke with said they wanted additional guidance on public involvement, the Forest Service's recently issued stewardship contracting handbook does not contain specific guidance for obtaining community input--and BLM's recent guidance is similarly lacking. Without such guidance, each project manager must independently determine the type and extent of community involvement to solicit and then develop and implement community involvement procedures--an inefficient process that could lead to variation in community involvement across stewardship contracting projects in both agencies.


Related Articles

  • WASHINGTON OUTLOOK. Gray, Gerry // American Forests;Summer2006, Vol. 112 Issue 2, p15 

    The article reports that the U.S. Congress has nearly completed its new annual funding bill for the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. The House has passed its version of the Fiscal Year 2007 Interior Appropriations bill and the Senate's version has cleared the...

  • Notice of Application for Proposed Withdrawal Extension and Opportunity for Public Meeting; Alaska. Fullmer, Mark // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;6/5/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 108, p33231 

    The article reports that the U.S. Forest Service (FS) has submitted an application with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior for extending the duration of public land order (PLO) 7393 for an additional 15-year term. According to the PLO, the National Forest...

  • Pruning Profits. Gillespie, Nick // Reason;Nov98, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p15 

    Compares the land management practices of the United States Forest Service and the US Bureau of Land Management. Percentage of the land mass overseen by the federal government; Annual deficits of the agencies on grazing fees and recreational activities; Result of a study from the PERC on the...

  • Western showdown.  // Newsweek;4/17/1995, Vol. 125 Issue 16, p39 

    Reports on several incidents of pipe bombings against US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) properties in Nevada, where local rangers have become targets of an anti-Fed campaign. Why some Westerners are at odds with Washington; The war-zone guidelines issued to BLM rangers;...

  • Road warriors. Jackson, Jen // Missoula Independent;6/16/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 24, p10 

    The article focuses on the closure of roads through public lands in the U.S. It notes the protests against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service. It also highlights the compliance of the Forest Service with the 2005 Travel Management Rule which requires each...

  • Public land, locked up. PETERSON, JODI // High Country News;12/9/2013, Vol. 45 Issue 21, p3 

    The article reports that according to Denver, Colorado-based nonpartisan Center for Western Priorities, federal public land in the Rocky Mountain West are inaccessible by public which are supposed to be managed by the U.S. federal agencies the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

  • Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming. Lee, John P. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;6/13/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 114, p35422 

    The article presents information that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior has filed the plat of survey for lands in Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming. The agency has filed these plats at the request of the U.S. Forest Service for the management of resources....

  • Top three pending land-use issues.  // Dealernews;Oct2010, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p36 

    The article reports on the three land-use issues gathered from the Motorcycle Industry Council in the U.S. The first document laid out the intention of the Bureau of Land Management on the transition from the adopted land management system to a modern landscape-level management system. It also...

  • Livestock Groups Rally For Wildfire Legislation.  // Beef Expert Blog;4/16/2013, p1 

    The article reports on the call by the U.S. National Cattlemen's Beef Association and Public Lands Council for the passage of the Catastrophic Wildfire Prevention Act of 2013. Introduced by Arizona Representative Paul Gosar to address wildfire risks on land managed by the U.S. Forest Service and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics