HHS Bioterrorism Preparedness Programs: States Reported Progress but Fell Short of Program Goals for 2002: GAO-04-360R
Tags: BIOTERRORISM; UNITED States. Government Accountability Office; PUBLIC health; CONTRACTS; BIOLOGICAL weapons
Related Articles
- Anthrax Detection: Agencies Need to Validate Sampling Activities in Order to Increase Confidence in Negative Reults: GAO-05-493T. Rhodes, Keith A. // GAO Reports;4/5/2005, p1
In September and October 2001, letters laced with Bacillus anthracis (anthrax) spores were sent through the mail to two U.S. senators and to members of the media. These letters led to the first U.S. cases of anthrax disease related to bioterrorism. In all, 22 individuals, in four states and...
- Agency says U.S. clueless on staffing of DVM force. MACEJKO, CHRISTINA // DVM: The Newsmagazine of Veterinary Medicine;Mar2009, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p8
The article reveals the findings of a report by the U.S. Govenment Accountability Office (GAO) on the awareness of the federal government regarding the sufficiency of its veterinarians. The office noted that government agencies employing veterinarians have assessed the shortage of public health...
- Chemical And Biological Defense: Army and Marine Corps Need to Establish Minimum Training Tasks and Improve Reporting for Combat Training Centers: GAO-05-8. Pickup, Sharon L. // GAO Reports;1/28/2005, p1
The Department of Defense (DOD) believes that it is increasingly likely that an adversary will use nuclear, biological, or chemical (NBC) weapons against U.S. forces. Consequently, DOD doctrine calls for U.S. forces to be sufficiently trained to continue their missions in an NBC-contaminated...
- Agencies Are Not Maximizing Opportunities for Competition or Savings under Blanket Purchase Agreements despite Significant Increase in Usage. // GAO Reports;10/9/2009, preceding p1
The article presents the September 2009 report of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives concerning contract management of the country. It discusses the usage of civilian agencies on the schedule blanket...
- Contract Management: Guidance Needed to Promote Competition for Defense Task Orders: GAO-04-874. Woods, William T. // GAO Reports;7/30/2004, p1
The Department of Defense (DOD) spends billions of dollars each year acquiring services through task orders issued under multiple-award contracts or the General Services Administration's federal supply schedule program. However, previous GAO and DOD Inspector General reports found that DOD was...
- Telecommunications: GSA Has Accumulated Adequate Funding for Transition to New Contracts but Needs Cost Estimation Policy: GAO-07-268. Koontz, Linda D. // GAO Reports;3/26/2007, p1
The General Services Administration (GSA) and its customer agencies are preparing to transition new governmentwide telecommunications contracts known as the Networx program. GSA estimated the costs for which it is responsible to be $151.5 million. This report addresses (1) the soundness of the...
- New Embassy Construction: Structured Interviews with Construction Firms (GAO-09-47SP, January 2009), an E-supplement to GAO-09-48. // GAO Reports;2/17/2009, p1
The article presents the summary from the series of structured interviews conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) with 17 constructions firms that won government contracts to build embassies, consulates and other diplomatic facilities in the U.S.
- Obligations. Kantner, Andrew S. // Army Lawyer;Jan2007, Issue 404, p181
The article offers updates on issues about obligations set by contracts made in the U.S. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) upheld that an agency may not correct an inadvertent ministerial error in obligation by adjusting a completed contract from a previous year. GAO released an...
- Capitol Visitor Center: Update on Status of Project's Schedule and Cost as of April 27, 2006: GAO-06-665T. Dorn, Terrell; Ungar, Bernard L. // GAO Reports;4/27/2006, p1
This testimony focuses on the Architect of the Capitol's progress in achieving selected project milestones and in managing the project's schedule since Congress's March 15, 2006, hearing on the project. As part of this discussion, we will address a number of key challenges and risks that...


