TITLE

Home Monitoring & Probation Technology Review

PUB. DATE
April 2013
SOURCE
Courts Today;Apr/May2013, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p31
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Product Review
ABSTRACT
The article features several home monitoring systems, including SCRAM Continuous Alcohol Monitoring (CAM), the Probation Kiosk from Phoenix Kiosk, and the DualTrak II transceiver from Sentinel.
ACCESSION #
87646018

 

Related Articles

  • Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systematic, and Political Issues. Immarigeon, Russ // Journal of Offender Monitoring;Summer/Fall2001, Vol. 14 Issue 3/4, p27 

    A review of the article "Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systematic, and Political Issues," by Brian K. Payne and Randy Gainey which appeared in the periodical "Journal of Offender Rehabilitation" is presented.

  • A SMART Solution to Jail CROWDING. Miller, George // Corrections Today;Jul2000, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p72 

    Evaluates the Satellite Monitoring and Remote Tracking (SMART) systems. Concept of SMART; Features of the system; Benefits of the system.

  • PACTSECM. Cadigan, Timothy P. // Federal Probation;Sep2001, Vol. 65 Issue 2, pN.PAG 

    Looks at the implications of implementing the Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking Electronic Case Management System (PACTSECM) for the advancement of the federal probation and pretrial services in the U.S. Information on the PACTS ECM application; Improvements done on the PACTS Unify for...

  • Electronic monitoring in Belgium : a penological analysis of current and future orientations. Beyens, Kristel; Roosen, Marijke // European Journal of Probation;2013, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p56 

    Electronic monitoring was introduced nationwide in Belgium in 2000 and has expanded ever since. Currently important changes are taking place, radically transforming its operation and nature. The aim of this article is to describe and critically discuss the current shift in EM discourses and...

  • Meeting the "Probable Cause" Standard for Electronic Monitoring. Moreland, Margaret R. // Journal of Offender Monitoring;2007, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p29 

    The article discusses three court cases conceding the relevance of electronic monitoring (EM) for evidential purposes. Included were the cases, New Jersey v. Scott and New Jersey v. Mathis, where detectives used global positioning system tracking device. The other cases were, Commonwealth v....

  • Scotland may trial tagging under-16s.  // Community Care;8/26/2004, Issue 1537, p10 

    Reports on the decision of Scottish councils to use electronic monitoring systems to persistent offenders who are under 16 years old as part of the implementation of the Antisocial Behaviour Bill. Plan of the executives to launch two-forms of community-based sentences; List of cities that were...

  • What Others Have to Say About Offender Fees for EM.  // Journal of Offender Monitoring;Winter/Spring2004, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p16 

    The article offers information on organizations that deal with rising cost of electronic monitoring. It presents their opinions on the availability of offender fee programs as a way to offset the costs. They include Carl Wickland, executive director of American Probation and Parole Association...

  • Electronic Monitoring: Positive Intervention Strategies. Gable, Ralph Kirkland; Gable, Robert S. // Federal Probation;Jun2005, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p21 

    The article focuses on the efficacy of electronic monitoring (EM) as a form of intensive supervision of non-violent offenders who appear to present little threat to the community in the U.S. In 2005, about 20 percent of community-based supervision in the country involves electronic monitoring...

  • Freed: Martha's Right Ankle. Abel, Olivia; Dyball, Rennie; Wong, Marisa; Wren, Jennifer; Cotliar, Sharon; Cunneff, Tom; Gallagher, Dede; Green, Mary; Hazlett, Courtney; Ingrassia, Lisa; Isackson, Noah; Jordan, Julie; Keith, Amy; McGee, Tiffany; Perra, John; Podesta, Jane; Sandler, Barbara; Santos, Fernanda; White, Nicholas // People;9/12/2005, Vol. 64 Issue 11, p26 

    Reports that celebrity Martha Stewart has been allowed to take off the ankle bracelet that she was required to wear. Assertion about how she removed it; How she is still under supervised release for 18 months; Claim by Stewart that the bracelet did not impede her ability to produce two new...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics