TITLE

Learn how IRB works and what board members want

PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
Clinical Trials Administrator;Mar2009, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Proceeding
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on anger management by clinical investigators when working with Institutional Review Board (IRB) members, which was discussed during the PRIM&R 2008 Advancing Ethical Research Conference held in Orlando, Florida. This discussion was led by Tonya Edvalson, research compliance manager at the University of Utah in the department of obstetrics and gynecology in Salt Lake City, Utah. Edvalson emphasizes the importance of understanding the job of IRBs by clinical investigators.
ACCESSION #
36793225

 

Related Articles

  • Educational sessions provide gentle guidance.  // IRB Advisor;Jul2013, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p77 

    The article discusses the "Coffee and Tea with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)," an educational session which New Jersey IRB has found to build good will and strengthen its image among researchers. Started by Deborah N. Smith, assistant to the IRB and IACUC at Monmouth University, the...

  • Investigators hold less favorable views of IRB than do research assistants.  // IRB Advisor;May2008, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p58 

    The article discusses research being done on the correlation between human subjects research training and satisfaction with the institutional review board (IRB). It references a study by Ricardo Cruz Jr. et al presented at the 2007 Annual Public Responsibility In Medicine & Research Human...

  • Finding ethical balance on protocol violations.  // IRB Advisor;Jul2009, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p83 

    The article focuses on the statement issued by Bruce Levin of Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health at the Columbia University Institutional Review Board Educational Conference held in New York City on March 17, 2009. At the conference he focused on ethics in protocol violations....

  • IRB Reform. Slater, Eve E. // New England Journal of Medicine;5/2/2002, Vol. 346 Issue 18, p1402 

    Editorial. Discusses articles in this issue which examine efforts to improve the system for reviewing research protocols. Article by Christian et al which describes a central review process for multi-institutional studies allowing institutional review boards (IRB) to focus on local...

  • IRBs ride out tough times, see hope for turnaround.  // IRB Advisor;Jan2011 Supplement, p1 

    The article presents the results of the 2010 annual Salary Survey of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Advisor. According to the report, trends in previous years such as few raises, job cuts and increasing workloads still remain in 2010. Among the respondents, 71% earned more than 50,000 U.S....

  • Put 'painful details' into IRB documentation, experts say.  // IRB Advisor;Feb2011, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p13 

    The article suggests that institutional review boards (IRBs) should include 'painful' details in key documentation areas. According to Jean Toth-Allen, PhD, biophysicist in the Office of Good Clinical Practice, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in Silver Springs,...

  • Educate investigators about waivers, research activities.  // IRB Advisor;Apr2011, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p41 

    The article discusses the strategies to prevent the omission of necessary information in the institutional review board (IRB) applications by educating the new investigators about the waivers and the research activities. An overview of the problems such as incomplete or missing waivers and...

  • Here are COI final rule changes for research.  // IRB Advisor;Jan2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p2 

    The article mentions that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) final rule on research conflicts of interest (COI), titled, "Responsibility of Applicants for Protecting Objectivity in Research for which Public Health Service Funding is Sought and Responsible Prospective...

  • Psychological association seeks to ease problems between IRBs, researchers.  // IRB Advisor;Jan2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p6 

    The article focuses on the recommendations released by the American Psychological Association's special task force to resolve the tensions between the institutional review boards (IRB) and psychology researchers. The association suggested that psychological researchers should do a better job...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics