TITLE

Welcome verdict

AUTHOR(S)
Quiney, Harriet
PUB. DATE
February 2014
SOURCE
Money Marketing;2/20/2014, p30
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The author conveys his concerns about a judgment handed down by the Court of Appeal in Great Britain in February 2014 in the case of Clark & Clark vs. In Focus, which held that it is impossible to collect an award from the Financial Ombudsman Service and then litigate the same matter in court.
ACCESSION #
94766880

 

Related Articles

  • Firms not obliged to work for non-paying clients, CoA rules. Dowell, Katy // Lawyer (Online Edition);5/2/2012, p2 

    The article informs that the Court of Appeal (CoA) of Great Britain has ruled under providing the judgement for the case "Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor (CKFT) v Gary Minkin" that lawyers are not under any obligation to continue acting for clients who refuse to settle their legal bills. In the...

  • Pearson Education Ltd v The Charter Partnership Ltd.  // EG: Estates Gazette;5/26/2007, Issue 721, p132 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the respondent brought a claim of negligence against the appellant who was the architect that had originally drawn up the designs and specifications of the warehouse he is leasing. The appellant failed to specify a rainwater drainage system designed to...

  • Helden v Strathmore Ltd.  // EG: Estates Gazette;5/21/2011, Issue 1120, p112 

    The article presents a court case in which the British Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the appellant who questioned the enforceability of a loan he made with the respondent. In the case, Helden versus Strathmore Ltd., the appellant failed to pay his loan obligation to the respondent,...

  • CASE NOTES.  // Accountancy;Jun2011, Vol. 147 Issue 1414, p81 

    The article discusses a court case in which the Court of Appeal held that legal professional privilege (LPP), outside the context of litigation, does not apply to any professionals other than qualified lawyers in Great Britain.

  • Albert Hall ruling restores balance.  // Publican's Morning Advertiser;4/28/2011, Issue 4, p19 

    The article discusses two court cases involving the Licensing Act in Great Britain and relates the decision of the Court of Appeal.

  • Supreme Court to hear HS2 appeal.  // Rail Business Intelligence;8/15/2013, Issue 444, p2 

    The article reports that a leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in Great Britain has been granted by one of the three judges in the British Court of Appeal who dismissed appeals brought by the High Speed Action Alliance, Heathrow Hub Ltd. and the 51M group of local authorities.

  • Brighton and Hove City Council v Collinson and another. Dobson, Sally // EG: Estates Gazette;5/22/2004, Issue 421, p150 

    Details the appeal for the Brighton and Hove City Council versus Collinson and another case, to the Great Britain Court of Appeal in May 12, 2004. Agreement of the council and the landlords for the leisure centre in Hove, England; Intention of the parties to exclude sections 24 to 28 of the...

  • Aziz v First Division Association (FDA). Ryan, Richard; Ward, Helen; O'Neil, Tori // Employers Law;May2010, p9 

    The article discusses a court case, Aziz v First Division Association (FDA), wherein an appeal to consider all 76 individual acts of discrimination by the FDA spanning several years which was submitted by the plaintiff was dismissed by the Court of Appeal (CA) for the reason that the CA...

  • Forced retirement decision 'good for employers'.  // Employers Law;Aug2010, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Great Britain Court of Appeal rejected the plaintiff's age discrimination claim after being forced to retire as a senior partner of a law firm at the age of 65.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics