TITLE

WHAT IS HABERMAS'S "BE TIER ARGUMENT" GOOD FOR?

AUTHOR(S)
Ferry, Victor
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
Argumentation & Advocacy;Fall2012, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p144
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The author discusses the philosopher Jurgen Habermas regarding his philosophy on force of the better argument. The author mentions that the idea of Habermas for better argument depends on the dissociation of the acceptability of force. The author states that Habermas features the rationality of rhetoric in the introduction of his book "Theory of Communicative Action."
ACCESSION #
86448253

 

Related Articles

  • Rational Argumentation and Social Change in the Frankfurt School Tradition. Strait, Paul L. // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;Jul2011, p190 

    An essay on rational argumentation and social change is presented. The author provides an overview on the writings of philosopher Jurgen Habermas, which synthesizes the ideas and technical vocabularies of several disparate schools of thought, German idealism, American pragmatism, and analytic...

  • Proceduralism and implicatures in dialogue: Reflections on improving rational cooperation under bounded reasoning conditions. Garbayo, Luciana // Language & Dialogue;2012, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p122 

    This article aims at discussing some of the problems for the construction of a shared moral point of view in dialogical context, through a revision of both Habermas’ proceduralistic discourse ethics and Grice’s pragmatist conversational implicatures project. I claim that a) by...

  • Theory to Practice. Christiansen, Craig R. // Administrative Theory & Praxis (M.E. Sharpe);Sep2012, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p477 

    In this article, the author focuses on the idioglossian construction of words in context to different theories. He mentions the work of Jurgen Habermas on the book "The Theory of Communicative Action" which is impenetrable for the readers. He highlights the dilemma of many theorists from the...

  • Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists? Mitchell, Gordon R. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;2003, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reports that objectivity is not a property of disembodied knowledge for Jürgen Habermas, rather, it is a type of speech act, a validity claim replete with normative assumptions and performative commitments. Since empirical-analytic inquiry proceeds through a process of unfettered...

  • PERELMAN AND HABERMAS. Haarscher, Guy // Law & Philosophy;Dec1986, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p331 

    The article discusses the works of Chaim Perelman and Jürgen Habermas as applied in the field of law. In his work, Perelman distinguished between formal justice and concrete justice. It defines formal justice as a way to treat similar situations in similar ways. Perelman thought that his New...

  • The Potential for Rationality: Rhetoric as Communicative Action. Cronje, Ruth J. // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2001 Arguing Communication, Vol. 1, p267 

    Information about a research paper discussed at the 2001 National Communication Association/American Forensic Association Summer Conference on Argumentation is presented. The discussion focuses on rhetoric as a mechanism of rationality in the process of social deliberation. In his book, "Theory...

  • Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse. French, Warren; Allbright, David // Journal of Business Ethics;Jan98 Part 2, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p177 

    Plato claimed that morality exits to control conflict. Business people increasingly are called upon to resolve moral conflicts between various stakeholders who maintain opposing ethical positions or principles. Attempts to resolve these moral conflicts within business discussions may be...

  • Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument. Blair, J. Anthony // Philosophy & Rhetoric;2012, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p148 

    This article challenges the view that rhetoric, dialectic and logic are three perspectives on argument, relating respectively to its process, its procedure, and its product. It also questions the view that rhetorical arguments represent a distinctive type. It suggests that, as related to...

  • Diskurs und Herrschaft - Ãœberlegungen zu Habermas' Legitimationslogik. Fach, Wolfgang // Zeitschrift für Soziologie;jun1974, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p221 

    The central thesis of J. HABERMAS' logic of legitimization is the following: Legitimate social norms can be justified by argumentation independent from their psychological efficacy. 'Justified by argumentation' means that - under the condition of unconstrained communication - the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics