Robotic vs. open RP: Who pays the cost?

Albertsen, Peter C.
September 2012
Urology Times;Sep2012, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p4
The author discusses the issue over the cost of robot-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy (RP) in Maryland.


Related Articles

  • Limitations and complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The other side of the coin. Kumar, D. Ananda; Sairam, K.; Srinivasan, V. // Indian Journal of Urology;Oct-Dec2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p601 

    The article discusses the status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in terms of its limitations and complications. The failure of the device is rare as it only happens in 34 out of 8240 cases. Patients who have undergone RALP have higher positive surgical margin (PSM)...

  • Robotic RP remains more costly than open technique. Bankhead, Charles // Urology Times;Sep2012, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p8 

    The article reports on the disparity on the costs of robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RP) in the U.S. Study shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic RP costs 40% more than a retropubic RP. It notes the association of high surgical volume with the lower RP cost. It adds the necessary...

  • 3 DECADES OF Robotic Surgery. Berry, Kevin M. // Robot;Nov/Dec2014, Issue 49, p36 

    The article discusses findings of research on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) that was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Topics noted include emerging concerns about the growing number of Adverse Event Reports (AER) and side effects from robot-assisted surgery, and the...

  • Robotic, open RP: Outcomes from 650,000 patients. Kuznar, Wayne // Urology Times;4/15/2015, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p8 

    The article discusses a research concerning the higher costs of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as compared with the open procedure (ORP). It states the perioperative morbidity advantage of RARP in the robotic procedure and outcomes in various patients, is provided. Also emphasized...

  • Positioning-Related Complications of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomies. Wen, Timothy; Deibert, Christopher M.; Siringo, Frank S.; Spencer, Benjamin A. // Journal of Endourology;Jun2014, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p660 

    Background and Purpose: Because of recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the primary treatment option in prostate cancer. RARP, however, necessitates patients to be placed in a steep Trendelenberg position, which...

  • Robot-assisted RP more costly than open surgery. Bankhead, Charles // Urology Times;Nov2011, Vol. 39 Issue 12, p9 

    The article presents an overview of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) that costs 71% more per procedure than open radical prostatectomy in the U.S. It mentions the influence of the rapid adoption of robotic technology on the dominant prostatectomy procedure. Dr. Jeffrey J....

  • Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A minihealth technology assessment in a teaching hospital. Barbaro, Silvana; Paudice, Alessandro; Scipioni, Serenella; Martin, Barbara; Charrier, Lorena; Bert, Fabrizio; Gianino, Maria Michela // HealthMed;2012, Vol. 6 Issue 7, p724 

    Objectives: The aim of this study is to perform a comparative costs analysis of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RAP) for clinically localized prostate cancer and to determine whether to expand the use of RAP or to continue with conventional...

  • Robotics offers good outcomes, but cost remains a factor. Overmyer, Mac // Urology Times;May2011, Vol. 39 Issue 6, p1 

    The article provides an overview of the practicability and prospect for robot-assisted surgeries. The views of J. Stuart Wolf, professor of urology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, are presented which sustain the belief that robotic kidney surgeries, because of the difference in...

  • Higher surgeon volume linked to lower RALP costs. Overmyer, Mac // Urology Times;4/1/2014, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p12 

    The article reports on a study conducted by senior author Dr. Jim C. Hu and colleagues from the University of California, Los Angeles' Ronald Reagan Medical Center. Results of the study indicate that up to $15 million could be saved yearly by referring patients who are candidates for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics