TITLE

Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy?

AUTHOR(S)
Waldman, Michael
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling affects democracy in the U.S. He believes that the ruling has allowed massive campaign spending without disclosing the identity of the financier.
ACCESSION #
53987582

 

Related Articles

  • Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy?  // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11 

    The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling does not affect...

  • Making value-smart purchases. Radar, Eric // Between the Lines (10807551);9/2/2010, Issue 1835, p13 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United case that businesses have the right to spend any amount on political campaigns. This ruling was criticized by many public interest groups and other institutions which acknowledge its potential negative impact on...

  • CITIZENS UNITED.  // Adbusters;Jul/Aug2014, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p1 

    The article reports on the landmark decision of the Supreme Court on the case Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission in the U.S. It notes that the dramatic turn of the evolution of the corporate form after the court set limits on the amount of money corporations could donate to...

  • Citizens United. Gizzi, John // Human Events;2/1/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p22 

    The author expresses his views on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. He emphasizes that the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions are now free to spend their money to support candidates for federal...

  • Courts and Congress Respond to Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Sharkey, Brian P. // Young Lawyer;May2010, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p1 

    The article focuses on the controversies surrounding the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It discusses the court's decision to strike down the ban on corporate political expenditure. It further states that court's ruling overturned...

  • More Candidates Advocate Pledge to Reduce Outside Spending in Elections. Friedlander, Robb // Public Citizen News;Sep/Oct2014, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p7 

    The article reports on the People's Pledge, a formal campaign finance agreement between all U.S candidates and their campaigns that seeks the reductions in outside spending in the U.S elections. Topics discussed include the ruling of the U.S Supreme Court in the court case Citizens United v....

  • The Radical Court: Law unleashed, constitutional questions abound. Cohn, William A. // New Presence: The Prague Journal of Central European Affairs;Summer2010, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p12 

    The article presents an analysis on the controversial rulings and law interpretations of the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to the Citizens United v. FEC. Accordingly, the Supreme Court has ruled that the political spending of corporations cannot be limited because it can violate their free...

  • A Bigger Boom Box. Rauber, Paul // Sierra;May/Jun2010, Vol. 95 Issue 3, p22 

    The article discusses a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which allows corporations to contribute an unlimited amount of money to candidates in federal elections. Topics include an overview of the environmental concerns as a...

  • Should Media Consultants Really Jump for Joy? D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p14 

    The article talks about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case of Citizens United and the potential response to media consultants to the decision. It cites several disadvantages such as the rise in expenditures, creating a strategic problem for candidate campaigns, more airway clutter, and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics