Working With Elementary and Middle School Science Teachers

Tushie, Jean
December 2009
Science Teacher;Dec2009, Vol. 76 Issue 9, p8
Academic Journal
The author reflects on working with elementary and middle school science teachers. She emphasizes the importance of working together with such teachers to ensure quality science education for K-12 students. She describes the negative impact of the implementation of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act on elementary science education. She also cites two ways in which high school teachers can enhance science education.


Related Articles

  • Spanish in the Primary Classroom: Collaboration, Integration, and Differentiation. Ankenbauer, Mary; Helms, Ronald G. // Journal of International Diversity;2013, Vol. 2013 Issue 1, p34 

    The article provides a method to enhance the social studies in the elementary school in the U.S. It says that doubt and concern about the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on social studies instruction have been expressed by social studies teachers and leaders. A steady reduction in...

  • Special Education: Additional Assistance and Better Coordination Needed among Education Offices to Help States Meet the NCLBA Teacher Requirements: GAO-04-659. Shaul, Marnie S. // GAO Reports;7/15/2004, p1 

    During the 2001-2002 school year, more than 400,000 special education teachers provided instructional services to approximately 6 million students with disabilities in U.S. schools. Two federal laws contain teacher qualification requirements that apply to special education teachers: the No Child...

  • NCLB Rules Back Common Rate. Gewertz, Catherine // Education Week;6/11/2009 Diplomas Count, p19 

    The article discusses changes that may be made regarding the way in which high schools calculate their graduation rates as part of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act. The way in which high schools may be able to calculate special needs students and English-language learners differently when...

  • Education Reform: It's Up to Us. WALKER, DOUG // NEA Today;Aug/Sep2010, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p5 

    The author discusses the potential reauthorization of the 2001 U.S. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act and the need for less reliance on standardized tests, and he calls for more activism from National Education Association (NEA) members to make this point clear to the U.S. Congress.

  • No Child Left Behind Rewrite.  // Congressional Digest;Apr2011, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p109 

    The article predicts the U.S. Congress will make substantial changes to the No Child Left Behind Act because of concerns about its over-reliance on standardized educational testing and standards that label schools as failures.

  • Fighting the Good Fight. Wolf, Mary Ann; Hall, Sara // T H E Journal;Jul2005, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p48 

    This article focuses on issues concerning Title II D: Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) of the No Child Left Behind Act of the U.S. According to Title II D, the states must show how technology will be integrated throughout all of their curriculum and instruction by December 31, 2006....

  • The Impact of the Pressures to Make Adequate Yearly Progress on Teachers in a Midwest Urban School District: A Qualitative Analysis. Hunt, John W.; Afolayan, Michael; Byrd-Blake, Marie; Fabunmi, Martins; Pryor, Brandt; Aboro, Pereari // Journal of Thought;Fall/Winter 2009, Vol. 44 Issue 3/4, p63 

    The article discusses a study by the Urban Education Research Team on the impact of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). It analyzes the responses of teachers in four pilot schools including two elementary schools, a middle school and a high school in order to address the issues of student...

  • TECH::WATCH.  // T H E Journal;Apr2008, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p16 

    An introduction to articles published within the issue is presented, including a research which found that the English fluency demanded by the No Child Left Behind Act in the U.S. may be reached in seven or eight years.

  • Experts Debate Validity.  // District Administration;Dec2006, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p16 

    The article discusses views of two education experts on the No Child Left Behind law in the United States. Robert Gordon of the Center for American Progress says it is a do-or-die proposition for American schools, but Richard Rothstein of the Economic Policy Institute claims it needs to go. The...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics