TITLE

Citizens United anniversary shows need for campaign finance reform

AUTHOR(S)
Price, David; Van Hollen, Chris
PUB. DATE
January 2015
SOURCE
Hill;1/29/2015, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision related to the Citizens United, campaign focused on renovating the campaign finance reform for elections in the U.S.
ACCESSION #
100738791

 

Related Articles

  • Movers & Shakers.  // Campaigns & Elections (2010);Jul2010, Vol. 31 Issue 293, p14 

    An interview with Carl Forti, political director of American Crossroads, is presented. Forti says that the goal of American Crossroads is to spend money where they think it can be most effective. He emphasizes an issue about a special election in Mississippi when Freedom's Watch was running...

  • A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A CORPORATION'S FIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE EXPANSION OF THEIR POLITICAL INFLUENCE: THE CASE OF CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION. Sandoval, Rodolpho; Avila, William // Southern Law Journal;Fall2011, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p253 

    The article analyses the First Amendment Rights of corporations with a specific reference to the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. It discusses the corporations' right of Freedom of Speech, limits of electioneering communication, and the concept of...

  • MONEY CHANGES Everything. EPPS, GARRETT // American Prospect;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p32 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. It infers that the Court's ruling on corporate personhood has resulted in the use of large amounts of untraceable money for political advertisements. Critics...

  • Groups Try to Cut Flow of Election Bucks.  // Multichannel News;1/23/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p25 

    The article focuses on the Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which permits corporations and unions to fund electioneering advertisements for and against political candidates in the run-up to election primaries. As stated, decision was a financial boon to...

  • We, the People. Ahmad, Meher; DiNovella, Elizabeth // Progressive;Apr2012, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p8 

    In this article, the author discusses the negative advertisement campaigns in the U.S. The author mentions that in the U.S. 2012 Presidential election, people will see the largest amount of money ever spent on negative advertisements, with total spending estimated more than three billion...

  • Citizens United: Latest Campaign Finance Decision Creates More Gray Areas. Getman, Elizabeth // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2010, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p13 

    The article looks at the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which permitted corporations to make unlimited advocacy expenditures in election campaigns. It cites the arguments presented by the defendant on issues like electioneering...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE CORPORATE FORM. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. // Wisconsin Law Review;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 4, p999 

    In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate expenditures on political campaigns. The decision has been widely criticized and praised as a matter of First Amendment law. But it is also interesting as another step in the evolution of our...

  • Spending Spree. Nicholas, Adele // InsideCounsel;Apr2010, Vol. 21 Issue 220, p18 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporate expenditure of independent political advertisements for candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment to the Constitution. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the court decided...

  • Off-Base Liberals Would Undo Citizens United. Von Spakovsky, Hans A. // Human Events;3/5/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 9, p1 

    The article reports on legislation proposed by Senator Chuck Schumer of New York and Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland in 2010 to reimpose part of the ban on independent political advocacy by corporations that was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United versus...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics