Re: “The ‘Case-Chaos Study’ l Adjunct or Alternative to Conventional Case-Control Study Methodology”

Pulliam, Juliet R. C.; Dushoff, Jonathan
January 2014
American Journal of Epidemiology;Jan2014, Vol. 179 Issue 2, p261
Academic Journal
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about a proposed permutation-based method for identification of risk factors in outbreak illnesses which can also serve as alternative to case-control studies.


Related Articles

  • The Authors Reply. Gillespie, Iain A.; Mook, Piers; Adak, Goutam K.; O'Brien, Sarah J.; McCarthy, Noel D. // American Journal of Epidemiology;Jan2014, Vol. 179 Issue 2, p262 

    A reply by the authors to a letter to the editor on their article about the case-chaos methodology for an existing outbreak data set is presented.

  • Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Ayre, Colin; Scally, Andrew John // Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development;Jan2014, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p79 

    The content validity ratio originally proposed by Lawshe is widely used to quantify content validity and yet methods used to calculate the original critical values were never reported. Methods for original calculation of critical values are suggested along with tables of exact binomial...

  • Re: “The ‘Case-Chaos Study’ as an Adjunct or Alternative to Conventional Case-Control StudyMethodology”. Höhle, Michael // American Journal of Epidemiology;May2013, Vol. 177 Issue 9, p1021 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "The `case-chaos study' as an adjunct or alternative to conventional case-control study methodology" published in the September 2012 issue.

  • ANSWERING TWO CRITICISMS OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING: A COMMENT. Serlin, Ronald C. // Psychological Reports;Oct2000, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p579 

    Provides insights on Leventhal's arguments on the one-tailed and dimensional two-tailed tests of hypothesis testing. Logic underlying the directional two-tailed test; Involvement of the operating characteristics of the tests themselves in the unconditional probability of a correct decision.

  • On the Interpretation, Robustness, and Power of Varieties of Case-Only Tests of Gene-Environment Interaction. Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J. // American Journal of Epidemiology;Dec2010, Vol. 172 Issue 12, p1335 

    The author addresses issues related to interpretation of the parameters in the proposed case-only linear regression approach to testing for gene-environment interaction recently considered by Clarke and Morris (Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(4):498–505). He also considers the robustness of...

  • MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and idiopathic male infertility. Singh, K.; Singh, S. K.; Raman, R. // Journal of Postgraduate Medicine;Oct-Dec2010, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p267 

    Background: DNA methylation is an important epigenetic feature of DNA that plays a pivotal role in gene expression regulation during spermatogenesis. The enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) catalyses the formation of folate intermediates that are vital for DNA synthesis and...

  • Statistical Significance Tests: Equivalence and Reverse Tests Should Reduce Misinterpretation. Parkhurst, David F. // BioScience;Dec2001, Vol. 51 Issue 12, p1051 

    Focuses on situations in which significance tests are used and a null hypothesis is not rejected, and the problem of interpreting the result as providing evidence for the null hypothesis without a logical basis. Description of a method for looking at data statistically but with different null...

  • Simes' procedure is ‘valid on average’. Rødland, Einar Andreas // Biometrika;Sep2006, Vol. 93 Issue 3, p742 

    Although Simes' modification of the Bonferroni procedure tends to perform very well, albeit often being slightly liberal for negatively dependent hypotheses, there are special cases where it fails more dramatically. We prove that these special cases are indeed special, applying only to specific...

  • Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates. Neal O. Jeffries // Biostatistics;Apr2007, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p500 

    In experiments involving many variables, investigators typically use multiple comparisons procedures to determine differences that are unlikely to be the result of chance. However, investigators rarely consider how the magnitude of the greatest observed effect sizes may have been subject to bias...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics