P&I corporate funded status data misleading

October 2012
Pensions & Investments;10/15/2012, Vol. 40 Issue 21, p10
A letter to the editor is presented in response to a report on the publication's website in 2012 concerning the funding adequacy of U.S. corporate defined-benefit pension plans.


Related Articles

  • Non-qualified plans help solve OBRA '93 dilemma. Nirtaut, Dennis J. // Business Insurance;5/9/94, Vol. 28 Issue 19, p15 

    Answers a reader's question about the items to be considered in developing a non-qualified defined contribution pension plan. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1993's reduction of the compensation cap for qualified pension plans; Employers' increased interest in non-qualified pension...

  • Pension plan funding `101'. Davis, Mark; Fischer, Diana // CMA Magazine;Dec97/Jan98, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p17 

    Discusses the fundamentals necessary in the financial management of defined-benefit (DB) pension plans. Pension actuary's role in the management of a DB pension plan; Framework in making decisions regarding pension plan funding; Types of valuations performed to determine appropriate funding...

  • U.S. corporate funded status flat for quarter. KILROY, MEAGHAN; BAERT, RICK // Pensions & Investments;7/7/2014, Vol. 42 Issue 14, p28 

    The article looks at defined-benefit (DB) pension plans in the U.S. and Canada as of July 2014, reporting on trends in average plan funding levels in the second quarter of 2014 and discussing factors affecting funding levels including movements in stock prices and interest rates.

  • Pension plan consolidations not necessarily a cure for ills. INMAN, TEKRY // Pensions & Investments;12/26/2011, Vol. 39 Issue 26, p12 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Time for coordination," in the November 28, 2011 issue, which discussed public defined benefit plans.

  • LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. Kujaca, James A. // Pensions & Investments;12/26/2005, Vol. 33 Issue 26, p8 

    A letter to the editor is presented about the manipulation of defined benefit pension plans perpetrated by senior executive greed in the U.S.

  • Measuring pension liabilities: An examination of the funding levels of defined benefit pension ... Blankley, Alan I.; Tang, Roger Y.W. // Journal of Applied Business Research;Spring95, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p73 

    Examines pension funding measures and interest rate disclosures for 223 firms from the Fortune 500. Use of liability measures to develop funding ratios which indicate sample firms' funding condition; Discount rate estimates and funding levels; Dependence between rates and funding.

  • Portability Revisited. Bartlett III, Dwight K. // Benefits Quarterly;1985 Third Quarter, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p60 

    Portability remains a largely unresolved problem for defined benefit pension plans. This note illustrates the adverse effect on purchasing power of vested pensions, resulting from inflation. It discusses three alternative approaches to providing portability. The writer suggests that the failure...

  • Pension plan funding levels improve tracking signs of global economic recovery.  // Insurance Advocate;01/05/2004, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p32 

    Reports improvement of the pension plan funding levels in the third quarter of 2003 in the U.S. Identification of signs of global economic recovery based on a Towers Perrin analysis of defined benefit pension plans; Evaluation of the Asian markets in terms of stock market resurgence and...

  • Time to jumpstart pension reform.  // Business Insurance;1/17/2005, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p8 

    The article discusses if the new Bush administration pension reform package the way to go in revamping the nation's badly outdated pension laws. A complexity certainly has been a disincentive for employers to continue to offer defined benefit plans. People welcome a long-overdue rewrite of the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics