TITLE

Registration as a General Practitioner

AUTHOR(S)
Brock, Raymond
PUB. DATE
August 1970
SOURCE
British Medical Journal;8/29/1970, Vol. 3 Issue 5721, p528
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
64097860

 

Related Articles

  • Thanks Gordon, dual registration was set for chaos. Deshpande, Anand // Pulse;1/19/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p23 

    A letter to the editor about dual general practitioner registration in Great Britain is presented.

  • Who is your general practitioner? Shaw, Jennifer; Holloway, Josanne // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);9/14/91, Vol. 303 Issue 6803, p628 

    Evaluates the study on the follow up of general practitioners to discharged patients. Details on case notes of patients not containing names of general practitioners; Importance of early patient identification for registration to general practitioners; Result of the study.

  • GMC votes to freeze retention fees.  // Pulse;11/11/2002, Vol. 62 Issue 43, p3 

    Reports on the decision of the General Practitioners Committee to freeze annual retention fee and other registration fees in 2003.

  • Brash approach. Webster, G. // British Dental Journal;7/10/2010, Vol. 209 Issue 1, p4 

    A letter to the editor is presented regarding the refusal of the General Dental Council (GDC) to provide a reduction in the free registration for retired dentist practitioners.

  • Opinion: Ballot box.  // GP: General Practitioner;10/9/2009, p23 

    The article reports that 72 percent of general practitioners (GPs) feel that dual registration in Great Britain should not be introduced.

  • Letters: Our patients don't know how lucky they are. Carmaciu, Ella // GP: General Practitioner;10/2/2009, p17 

    A letter to the editor is presented related to the registration of patients with more than one general practitioner (GP).

  • Letters: Fees for GP registration would be proportionate. Young, Baroness Barbara // GP: General Practitioner;11/20/2009, p24 

    A letter to the editor in response to a previously published article about Care Quality Commission's (CQC) plans for the registration of general practitioners is presented.

  • GP registration with the CQC.  // Pulse;10/3/2012, Vol. 72 Issue 32, p4 

    The article presents questions and answers related to general practitioners registration with the Care Quality Commission in Great Britain including the deadline for registration, after-registration processes and standards of practice assessment.

  • GPC wants funding for CQC registration. Rimmer, Abi // GP: General Practitioner;5/13/2011, p4 

    The article reports that the General Practitioners Committee (GPC) will demand an increase in general practitioner (GP) income from 2012. The move is aimed to cover registration cost of GP with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). GPC chairman Dr Laurence Buckman said that the registration cost as...

  • When is a patient legally 'yours'? Ainsworth, Steve // Pulse;3/10/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 10, p88 

    Replies to a query as to when an individual is considered legally a general practitioner's (GP) patient. Distinction between registration and acceptance in a GP's patient list.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics