TITLE

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for breast cancer

AUTHOR(S)
Willis, Brian H.; McCowan, Colin; Fahey, Tom; Little, Paul
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
British Journal of General Practice;Jun2011, Vol. 61 Issue 587, p382
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Identifying suspected breast cancer: Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule," by C. McCowan, P. T. Donnan PT, J. Dewar, and colleagues in the 2011 issue.
ACCESSION #
63277088

 

Related Articles

  • BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH: Still awaiting screening facts. Baum, Michael; Thornton, Hazel; Gotzsche, Peter C. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;11/6/2010, Vol. 341 Issue 7780, p955 

    A letter to the editor is presented concerning breast cancer screening.

  • Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening. Junod, Bernard; Spinosa, Jean Pierre // Journal of Medical Screening;Jun2010, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p103 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article regarding the individuals spared in the occurrence of overdiagnosis in breast cancer.

  • Duffy and colleagues reply. Duffy, S. W.; Tabar, L.; Olsen, A. H.; Vitak, B.; Allgood, P. C.; Chen, T. H. H.; Yen, A. M.F.; Smith, R. A. // Journal of Medical Screening;Jun2010, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p103 

    A response by S. W. Duffy and colleagues to a letter to the editor about their article "Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England" in the 2010 issue of "Journal of Medical Screening" is...

  • Stop treating indolent lesions. Evans, Andy; Cornford, Eleanor; James, Jonathan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;8/15/2009, Vol. 339 Issue 7717, p360 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends," by K. J. Jørgensen and P. C. Gøzsche in the July 9, 2009 issue.

  • A different role for FDG PET/CT in axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer. Aukema, Tjeerd; Straver, Marieke; Valdés Olmos, Renato; Vogel, Wouter // European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging;Nov2009, Vol. 36 Issue 11, p1896 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients," by T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, S. Hahn, A. Koeninger, F. Otterbach and M. E. Hamami.

  • Reply to the Letter “A different role of FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer”. Heusner, Till; Kuemmel, Sherko; Antoch, Gerald; Stahl, Alexander // European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging;Nov2009, Vol. 36 Issue 11, p1898 

    A response by T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, S. Hahn, A. Koeninger, F. Otterbach and M. E. Hamami to a letter to the editor about their article "A different role of FDG-PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer," which appeared in the previous issue is presented.

  • Two-Stage Breast Cancer Screening in the Developing World. Batsis, Charalabos // World Journal of Surgery;Mar2011, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p698 

    A letter to the editor is presented which discusses the two-stage approach for breast cancer screening in Egyptian women.

  • Breast cancer experience has wider implications. Crawford, S. Michael // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/25/2007, Vol. 335 Issue 7616, p361 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study," by S. Potter, S. Govindarajulu et al. in the August 11, 2007 issue.

  • Breast cancer growth rates favour abolition of rule. Helm, Emma J.; Nash, Edward // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/25/2007, Vol. 335 Issue 7616, p361 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study," by S. Potter, S. Govindarajulu et al. in the August 11, 2007 issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics