Whose rights?

Wickenden, Mirhael; Catt, Peter
June 2010
Plantsman: New Series;Jun2010, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p126
Academic Journal
A letter to the editor and a reply are presented in response to the article "The Plantsman," by Peter Catt in the December 2009 issue.


Related Articles

  • ARE PLANT BREEDER'S RIGHTS OUTDATED? A DESCRIPTIVE AND EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF PLANT BREEDER'S RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA, 1987-2007. Sanderson, Jay; Adams, Kathryn // Melbourne University Law Review;2008, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p980 

    Taking the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (Cth) as its focus, this article explores the notion that plant breeder's rights are out-of-date and unnecessary. To do so, this article adopts both descriptive and empirical approaches to examining a number of issues including: the nature of, and...

  • Plant Watch inspections expand.  // Landscape Trades;Apr2015, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p22 

    The article talks about the success of the Plant Watch program after completing another year of protecting plant patents, Plant Breeders Rights, & branded programs, while they have successfully prevented the curtail of illegal activities since over 9 years.

  • Statistical aspects of essential derivation, with illustrations based on lettuce and barley. Eeuwijk, F.A. van; Law, J.R // Euphytica;Mar2004, Vol. 137 Issue 1, p129 

    The concept of essential derivation was introduced by UPOV in 1991 to refine the scope of breeders' rights. The intention of the essential derivation concept was to confer breeders protection against fraudulent practices in which ‘new’ varieties are produced from current, protected...

  • Hydrangeas in a PVR squeeze. Overdijk, Tjeerd; Leune, Maarten // FloraCulture International;Apr2013 Supplement, p36 

    The article focuses on the case of Hydrangea in the Netherlands in the autumn of 2012, in which the plant variety rights (PVR) of breeders are hindered. It mentions that Hydrangea Breeders' Association (HBA) has confronted with a non-licensed grower of Hydrangea due to illegal propagation. It...

  • Industry warned on infringement of intellectual property.  // Horticulture Week;7/1/2011, p11 

    The article reports on the enforcement seminar organized by the Community Plant Variety Office which warns that all parts of the production and trade chain can be liable for infringement of plant breeder's rights (PBR) in Germany.

  • EdMail. Lodhi, Raihan A. K.; Bhatti, Yasir Javed // Technology Times;8/4/2014, Vol. 5 Issue 32, p2 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues such as the importance of trees and plants to keep the atmosphere on the roads and the implementation of plant breeders rights (PBR).

  • Securing the future for innovation in horticulture. Mansuino, Andrea // FloraCulture International;Sep2014, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p12 

    The article presents a reprint of the article "Securing the future for innovation in horticulture" by Andrea Mansuino, which appeared in the June 2014 issue of the newsletter "Farmletter." Topics discussed include the intellectual property (IP) rights of plant breeders, the efforts to promote...

  • Action group opposes seed amendment bill.  // Technology Times;11/24/2014, Vol. 5 Issue 46, p1 

    The article reports on the opposition of the Sustainable Agriculture Action Group (SAAG) towards the plan of the federal government to approve the proposed Seed Amendment Bill 2014 and Plant Breeders' Rights Act.

  • Omnibus food and seed legislation will benefit business, not farmers. Slater, Ann // CCPA Monitor;Jul2014, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p10 

    The article discusses the Agricultural Growth Act (Bill C-18) which is said to benefit business not farmers in Canada. The proposed changes in nine separate federal agriculture laws including the Plant Breeder's Rights Act, the Seeds Act, and the Health of Animals Act under the omnibus bill were...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics