Were we right?
Tags: LETTERS to the editor; DARWIN, Charles, 1809-1882
Related Articles
- BULLY FOR GOULD. Kopp, Carolyn // Natural History;Mar90, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p3
Presents a letter to the editor concerning the omission of Charles Darwin's role in zoological nomenclature from "Bully for Brontosaurus," by Stephen Jay Gould in the February 1990 issue.
- Darwin's visit to South Africa in 1836. Thackeray, J. Francis // South African Journal of Science;May/Jun2005, Vol. 101 Issue 5/6, following p218
Presents a letter to the editor about English naturalist Charles Darwin's research.
- Spring 2009 Was a Good Start. May, S. Randolph // Phi Kappa Phi Forum;Summer2009, Vol. 89 Issue 2, p3
A letter to the editor in response to the article about the Charles Darwin phenomenon of evolution is presented.
- Comparing the legacies of Gauss, Pasteur and Darwin. Schmidhuber, J�rgen // Nature;4/3/2008, Vol. 452 Issue 7187, p530
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Darwin's enduring legacy," by Kevin Padian in the 2008 issue.
- What Darwin knew. Abler, William L. // Nature;12/18/2003, Vol. 426 Issue 6968, p759
Presents a letter to the editor claiming that Charles Darwin may have read the book "Natural Theology," by William Paley.
- NO SIMPLE CATEGORY. Santella, Edward J. // Commonweal;4/20/2007, Vol. 134 Issue 8, p2
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "The Gentle Darwinians," by Peter Quinn in the March 9, 2007 issue.
- A FREUDIAN SLIP? Deen, Rosemary // Commonweal;4/20/2007, Vol. 134 Issue 8, p2
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "The Gentle Darwinians," by Peter Quinn in the March 9, 2007 issue.
- A FREUDIAN SLIP? Quinn, Peter // Commonweal;4/20/2007, Vol. 134 Issue 8, p2
A response by Peter Quinn to several letters to the editor about his article "The Gentle Darwinians," by Peter Quinn in the March 9, 2007 issue is presented.
- Goodbye to Darwin from a contemporary with vision. Kool, Richard // Nature;12/24/2009, Vol. 462 Issue 7276, p984
A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on naturalist Charles Darwin.


