TITLE

Why didn't DEFRA follow the rules?

PUB. DATE
April 2008
SOURCE
Farmers Weekly;4/4/2008, p59
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about the advertisement of the British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on biosecurity and good husbandry in the March 28, 2008 issue.
ACCESSION #
31801954

 

Related Articles

  • Harmonizing biosecurity oversight for gene synthesis. Fischer, Markus; Maurer, Stephen M. // Nature Biotechnology;Jan2010, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p20 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about biosecurity standards for commercial gene synthesis, published in the December 2009 issue.

  • BARDA's budget. Klotz, Lynn C.; Pearson, Alan // Nature Biotechnology;Aug2009, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p698 

    A letter to the editor about funding needs for the development of medical countermeasures to potential bioterrorism agents from 2009 through 2015 is presented.

  • Response to A shocking biodefense editorial.  // Nature Biotechnology;Oct2007, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p1083 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the editorial entitled "US biodefense-shocking and awful" in the June 25, 2007 issue of the periodical Nature Biotechnology.

  • A shocking biodefense editorial. Vanderwagen, W. Craig // Nature Biotechnology;Oct2007, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p1083 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "US biodefense-shocking and awful," in the June 2007 issue.

  • Cost/success projections for US biodefense countermeasure development. Matheny, Jason; Mair, Michael; Smith, Bradley // Nature Biotechnology;Sep2008, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p981 

    A letter to the editor is presented concerning the development of a U.S. bio-defense countermeasure by the Department of Health and Human Services.

  • DNA committee is model for bioterrorism debate. Perpich, Joseph G. // Nature;12/5/2002, Vol. 420 Issue 6915, p462 

    Presents a letter to the editor of the scientific journal 'Nature,' commenting on a previously published article about the need to protect the public from bioterrorism while maintaining the open exchange of biomedical research findings. Establishment of the U.S. National Institutes of Health's...

  • Mutant flu: assessing biosecurity risks. Rath, Johannes // Nature;2/23/2012, Vol. 482 Issue 7386, p470 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article regarding the concern of minimizing biosecurity measures in mutant H5N1 avian influenza just to assigning access rights to sensitive materials and information.

  • US expands anti-bioterrorist measures. Fox, Jeffrey L. // Nature Biotechnology;Nov2001, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p998 

    Reports on the expansion of anti-bioterrorist measures in the U.S. Impact of September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks; Concerns over risks of bioterrorism; Sole U.S. supplier of anthrax vaccine.

  • A History Lesson. Ma, Henry // Forbes Asia;2/13/2006, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p10 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about the civilization of the Philippines.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics