TITLE

Correspondence

PUB. DATE
March 2000
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Mar2000, Issue 101, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
Presents readers' comments about religion and society published in the `First Things' periodical. Interpretations of Catholic teachings about confessional states; Catholic position on justification; Response to criticisms of the book `Roses, Fountains & Gold: The Virgin Mary in History, Art and Apparition.'
ACCESSION #
2809422

 

Related Articles

  • Epistemic disaster averted. Hetherington, Stephen // Analysis;Jul99, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p194 

    Shows that philosopher Charles Cross' kind of reasoning undermines an extension of the arguments made by Peter Klein and Ted Warfield, an extension which aims to establish that justification as such is not truth-conducive. Stability in the beliefs' joint portrayal of the world; Differences...

  • LETTER II: MISS CLARISSA HARLOWE, TO MISS HOWE FRIDAY, AUG. 11. Harlowe, C. L. // Clarissa Harlowe; or the History of a Young Lady -- Volume 8;1/1/1902, p6 

    A letter to Anna Howe is presented concerning the sender's justification in choosing Belford as an executor.

  • Erratum.  // Foundations (0144378X);Autumn2004, Issue 52, p24 

    Presents a correction to the article "Justification and the Ordo Salutis," by A. T. B. McGowan, which was previously published in the periodical "Foundations."

  • Regress and the doctrine of epistemic original sin. Norman, Andrew // Philosophical Quarterly;Oct97, Vol. 47 Issue 189, p477 

    Examines why the regress of justification is a conceptual problem. Concepts of being justified and being justified by; What needs to be done for a judgment to be justified; How to avoid a regress of justification; Assessment of the epistemological nature of justification.

  • TRUTH AS CONVENIENT FRICTION. Price, Huw // Journal of Philosophy;Apr2003, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p167 

    Examines the distinction between justification and truth. Behavioral difference between a community of realists and a community of pragmatists; Fundamental aspect of the normative structure of dialogue; Identification of truth with justification.

  • The Indulgence Controversy, Again. Root, Michael // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Dec2001, Issue 118, p24 

    Confronts the arguments against indulgences in the Roman Catholic Church. Imprecise explanation of Protestants to the doctrine of justification; Prohibition of abuses of indulgences in the Council of Trent and the reforms of the Catholic Reformation; Definition of indulgences.

  • The Politics of Justice and the Paradox of Justification. Schmidt, Volker H. // Social Justice Research;Mar1998, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p3 

    Pluralism, (normative) uncertainty, and disagreement are all widely held to constitute major obstacles for gaining assent to policy choices, especially when they concern legitimation-sensitive issues and hence are in particular need of a sound justification. Plausible as it appears to be, in the...

  • Argumentation and Interpersonal Justification. Goldman, Alvin I. // Argumentation;May1997, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p155 

    There are distinct but legitimate notions of both personal justification and interpersonal justification. Interpersonal justification is definable in terms of personal justification. A connection is established between good argumentation and interpersonal justification.

  • Standing or Falling? Preus, Jack // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Dec1995, Issue 58, p9 

    Presents a letter to the editor about the doctrine of justification.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics