TITLE

Trends in the Impact Factor of Scientific Journals

AUTHOR(S)
Falagas, Matthew E.; Zouglakis, George M.; Papastamataki, Paraskevi A.
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Mayo Clinic Proceedings;Oct2006, Vol. 81 Issue 10, p1401
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article related to the impact factor of the quality publications in scientific journals.
ACCESSION #
23272676

 

Related Articles

  • Acronym Addiction. Summers, James Bradley; Kaminski, Joseph // Texas Heart Institute Journal;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p108 

    Presents a letter to the editor regarding the increased misuse of acronyms in scientific journals that has led to the coining of acronymania, acronymophilia and acronymesis.

  • Polypublishing. Kirton, Jennifer // New Scientist;9/20/2008, Vol. 199 Issue 2674, p19 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on problems in scientific publishing in the developing world in the july 12, 2010 issue.

  • Access to science journals: Pros and cons. Rajput, Abhay S. // Current Science (00113891);9/25/2008, Vol. 95 Issue 6, p702 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Science Journals: Issues of Access," by P. Balaram in the previous article.

  • Impact factor does not have to monopolize scientific journals ranking. Kozak, Marcin // Current Science (00113891);3/10/2009, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p634 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article regarding the significance of impact factor (IF) to journals written by scientists.

  • Defining duplicate publication. Galley, Helen F. // Intensive Care Medicine;Feb2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p371 

    A letter to the editor is presented which raises discussions about problems of overlap between scientific publications.

  • Defining duplicate publication: reply to H. F. Galley. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J. // Intensive Care Medicine;Feb2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p373 

    A response by the author to a letter to the editor about the problems of overlap between scientific publications is presented.

  • Publishing perils include single-blind review. Williams, Lance // Physics Today;Nov2007, Vol. 60 Issue 11, p12 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to a previous letter on electronic submissions for papers in the January 2007 issue.

  • Publishing in SCI journals: Why double standards? Pal Singh, Harminder // Current Science (00113891);10/10/2007, Vol. 93 Issue 7, p887 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on the need to encourage scientists and researchers to publish their work in journals of high impact factor (IF) by O. P. Sharma in a 2007 issue.

  • Publication charges. Narayanan, M. S. // Current Science (00113891);10/10/2007, Vol. 93 Issue 7, p889 

    A letter to the editor is presented about the mandatory publication/page charges demanded by some journals for publishing scientific papers in India.

  • Don't release other people's data without their consent. Frank, Daniel N. // Nature;10/2/2008, Vol. 455 Issue 7213, p589 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Physicists aflutter about data photographed at conference," featured in the 455th issue of "Nature."

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics