TITLE

Information recall by patients

AUTHOR(S)
Kai Ming Chow
PUB. DATE
July 2003
SOURCE
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Jul2003, Vol. 96 Issue 7, p370
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Patients' Memory for Medical Information," by R. P. Kessels in the May 2003 issue.
ACCESSION #
23128137

 

Related Articles

  • Never mind assessments. Sayce, John // Community Care;8/12/2004, Issue 1535, p24 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Looking for Common Ground," in the July 22, 2004 issue of "Community Care" magazine.

  • Letter To The Editor. Roby, Bob // Physician Executive;Nov/Dec2006, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p4 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Low Patient Satisfaction Scores: The Five Stages of Response," by Joseph R. Twanmoh in the September/October 2006 issue.

  • Medical audit. Dupre, P. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Dec1989, Vol. 82 Issue 12, p774 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about medical audit in the August 1989 issue.

  • Patient-delivered partner medication: the antagonism of clinical standards and good medical practice.  // International Journal of STD & AIDS;Apr2008, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p283 

    A letter to the editor is presented which discusses the clinical standards and good medical practice involve in Patient-Delivered Partner Medication (PDPM).

  • Matron scheme 'is not a failure'. Smith, Richard // Pulse;11/30/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 45, p26 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about Evercare's evaluation of the quality of medical care in Great Britain, which appeared in the November 16, 2006 issue.

  • CRITICISM OF OUTPATIENTS DEPARTMENTS IS INACCURATE. Dodds, Christine; Dear, Karen // Nursing Standard;1/14/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 19, p33 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to a letter by Alan Halliday on the Royal College of Nursing campaign "Dignity: At the Heart of Everything We Do," published in the January 7, 2009 issue.

  • THANKS TO THE A&E AND ITU STAFF FOR THEIR SKILL AND COMPASSION. McSorley, Andrew // Nursing Standard;6/20/2012, Vol. 26 Issue 42, p33 

    A letter to the editor is presented which is concerned with the quality of medical care that was provided to a British patient.

  • NEW COMMISSION WILL BRING ANOTHER ROUND OF CHANGES. Brown, Jane // Nursing Standard;4/15/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 32, p33 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article by Alison Moore on the health care regulator in England, the Care Quality Commission, published in the April 1, 2009 issue.

  • Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals. Aviles, Alan D. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;10/8/2008, Vol. 300 Issue 14, p1650 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article “Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals,” by R.M. Werner in the 2008;299(18):2180-2187 issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics