TITLE

Continuing care

AUTHOR(S)
Reynolds, Jane
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
British Journal of General Practice;Dec2005, Vol. 55 Issue 521, p966
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about the funding of Great Britain's National Health Service for continuing care.
ACCESSION #
19888459

 

Related Articles

  • Open £110bn NHS budget to public scrutiny. Bansal, Vijay // Pulse;2/3/2010, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p11 

    A letter to the editor is presented regarding the 110 billion pounds budget of Great Britain's National Health Services.

  • Easy to forget the ghosts. Munro, Alick // Pulse;5/12/2010, Vol. 70 Issue 16, p15 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on the address verification of patients by primary care trusts (PCT) in deprived areas in Great Britain in the previous issue.

  • Screening plan is the last straw. Borg-Costanzi, Joe // Pulse;1/30/2008, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p24 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about the vision of Prime Minister Gordon Brown for the National Health Service in Great Britain that was published in the previous issue.

  • Letters: GP apologises over NHS Direct story. McGilligan, Joe // GP: General Practitioner;3/11/2011, p31 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to a letter about NHS Direct in the February 25, 2011 issue.

  • The National Health Service: A Systemic Experience in Appreciative Frustration. Hills, John // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy;Sep2007, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p173 

    A letter to the editor is presented about how the health and social care in Great Britain are organized.

  • Healthy debate. Edwards, Ray // Engineer (00137758);9/7/2009, Vol. 294 Issue 7779, p20 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article regarding the health services delivered by the National Health Service (NHS) in Great Britain in the previous issue.

  • LETTERS.  // Engineer (00137758);9/7/2009, Vol. 294 Issue 7779, p21 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about the efficacy of the health services offered by the National Health Service in Great Britain in the previous issue.

  • Praise where due. Bairstow, J. // British Dental Journal;12/24/2011, Vol. 211 Issue 12, p581 

    A letter to the editor is presented which discusses the uncaring attitude being showed by the National Health Services (NHS) in Great Britain and her experience in Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (LCFT).

  • Analysis is only as good as data. Walmsley, Matthew // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);4/16/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7496, p906 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Mapping choice in the NHS: cross sectional study of routinely collected data," by M. Damiani, C. Propper, and J. Dixon, in the February 5, 2005 issue.

  • Authors' reply. Propper, Carol; Damiani, Michael; Dixon, Jennifer // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);4/16/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7496, p907 

    Presents a response by Carol Propper, Michael Damiani, and Jennifer Dixon to a letter to the editor about their article, "Mapping choice in the NHS: cross sectional study of routinely collected data," in the February 5, 2005 issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics