- Specified Principlism: What is it, and Does it Really Resolve Cases Better than Casuistry? Strong, Carson // Journal of Medicine & Philosophy;Jun2000, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p323
Principlism has been advocated as an approach to resolving concrete cases and issues in bioethics, but critics have pointed out that a main problem for principlism is its lack of a method for assigning priorities to conflicting ethical principles. A version of principlism referred to as...
- Reply to Strong on Principlism and Casuistry. Beauchamp, Tom L. // Journal of Medicine & Philosophy;Jun2000, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p342
Comments on the article made by author, Carson Strong on an interpretation of specified principlism for bioethics. Claims of Strong on the failure of principlism to appreciate the capability of casuistry of providing discursive justifications; Requisites for understanding the idea of paradigm...
- INTRODUCTION. Luna, Florencia // Bioethics & Vulnerability;2006, p1
An introduction to the chapters discussed within the book "Bioethics and Vulnerability: A Latin American View" is presented, including a chapter by Arleen L. F. Salles on challenges facing bioethics in Latin America, another chapter on the potential of casuistry, and another chapter on the...
- Book reviews. Hower, Robert // Church History;Sep97, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p688
Reviews the book `The Context of Casuistry,' edited by James F. Keenan, S.J. and Thomas A. Shannon.
- Problems with Rules. Sunstein, Cass R. // California Law Review;Jul95, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p953
Many of the most difficult issues in law involve the choice between rules and rulelessness in cases where both seem unacceptable. The principal goal of this Article is to point the way toward a more refined understanding of the ideal of the rule of law, one that sees a degree of particularity,...
- Strong on Specification. Jonsen, Albert R. // Journal of Medicine & Philosophy;Jun2000, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p348
Focuses on casuistry and theory in bioethics. Importance of specification and casuistic analysis to understand cases; Clarification of the relationship among theory, principles and circumstances in moral decision-making; Function of topics and maxims as elements of moral discourse; Role of...
- BIOETHICS: A "NEW" PRUDENCE FOR AN EMERGENT PARADIGM? Bracci, Sharon L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Winter2002, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p151
Deals with bioethics, an emergent model of an interdependent ethic, and its focus on casuistry to resolve value-laden issues. Analysis of a bioethics case; Discussion on the proposed dialogical virtues in the services of a prudential deliberator.
- Current theology. Keenan, James F. // Theological Studies;Mar96, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p123
Offers a comprehensive survey of writings on casuistry that demonstrate how it became to be understood as an instance not of deductive but rather inductive reasoning. Reason for entering religious order; Raising of question in the religious and political conflicts in England at the end of the...
- Book reviews. Boyle, John P. // Theological Studies;Mar98, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p169
Reviews the book `Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning,' by Richard B. Miller.