TITLE

Scientific papers are not written to disseminate information

PUB. DATE
January 2005
SOURCE
BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/29/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7485, p256
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Why doctors don't read research papers," in the December 11, 2004 issue.
ACCESSION #
16103988

 

Related Articles

  • Author's reply.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/29/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7485, p256 

    Presents the response of Kevin Barraclough to letters to the editor regarding his article "Why doctors don't read research papers," in the December 11, 2004 issue.

  • Editors' behaviour might have something to do with it.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/29/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7485, p256 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Why doctors don't read research papers," in the December 11, 2004 issue.

  • DATA OPENNESS. Goudie, Andrew J.; Pim Kon; Freeman, Andrew // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;11/13/2010, Vol. 341 Issue 7781, p1011 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Missing clinical trial data: setting the record straight," by F. Godlee and colleagues in the October 12, 2010 issue, and "Data availability for industry sponsored trials: what should medical...

  • Good scientific writing. Kozak, Marcin // Current Science (00113891);6/25/2007, Vol. 92 Issue 12, p1659 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article by V. Sarma about the importance of good scientific writing.

  • Academic medicine: time for reinvention. Caan, Woody // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/3/2004, Vol. 328 Issue 7430, p48 

    Presents a letter to the editor regarding the need for national strategies to improve clinical trials and medical research in Great Britain.

  • Scope of EPOC is clarified. McAuley, Laura M; Grimshaw, Jeremy; Zwarenstein, Merrick // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);7/12/2003, Vol. 327 Issue 7406, p106 

    Presents a letter to the editor of 'British Medical Journal' concerning the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC). Disagreement with Øvretveit and Gustafson that EPOC has developed methods to assess observational studies; Discussion of the EPOC purpose in...

  • Rehashing "You Say Potato, I Say Potatah" Beuscher, Johnn // Applied Clinical Trials;Jul2004, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p14 

    Presents a letter to the editor about the use of the term "Subjects," with regard to Clinical Trial Participants.

  • Reducing Placebo Response: The Unbiased Electronic Rater. Tiplady, Brian // Applied Clinical Trials;Feb2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p16 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Reducing Placebo Response: Triple Blinding & Setting Expectations," in the February 01, 2006 issue.

  • What About Size?  // Applied Clinical Trials;Jun2008, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p16 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Key Factors in CRO Selection" in the previous issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics