TITLE

CORRESPONDENCE

AUTHOR(S)
O'Neill, Joseph F.; Murphy, Timothy F.
PUB. DATE
September 2003
SOURCE
New Republic;9/8/2003-9/15/2003, Vol. 229 Issue 10/11, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
Presents letters to the editor of "New Republic" for September 8, 2003. Reader comment on the July 21 editorial, "Talk Is Cheap," concerning United States policy on AIDS relief in Africa; Reply from the editor stating that the U.S. is cutting foreign aid that supports a public health system on the continent; Reader comment on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas in regard to the use of biological theory in advancing civil rights for gays.
ACCESSION #
10708407

 

Related Articles

  • What was the Lawrence Supreme Court decision? Highleyman, Liz // Bay Area Reporter;6/26/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 26, p16 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Lawrence v. Texas case in 2003.

  • SEX AND THE SUPREMES. Toobin, Jeffrey // New Yorker;8/1/2005, Vol. 81 Issue 22, p32 

    Reports on the actions taken by the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the issue of gay rights in the U.S. Ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Lawrence v. Texas, which deals with the criminalization of sodomy; State of the contemporary gay-rights movement; Series of events leading to the...

  • Timing of Henry VIII's sodomy law matters. Gorton, Don // Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p6 

    Presents a letter to the editor of "The Gay & Lesbian Review" concerning the Nov.-Dec. 2003 issue commenting on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Lawrence v. Texas case.

  • BEYOND ROMER AND LAWRENCE: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET. Marcus, Nancy C. // Columbia Journal of Gender & Law;2006, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p355 

    In this article the author examines the meaning inherent in the decisions made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding laws governing the right to privacy. The time period under discussion is the late in the era in which William Rehnquist was chief justice and during the early period...

  • Misjudged. Landau, Joseph // New Republic;2/16/2004, Vol. 230 Issue 5, p16 

    The author argues that recent court cases related to the Supreme Court's "Lawrence v. Texas" decision demonstrate that the decision did not pave the way for substantial advances in gay rights. Last year, conservatives responded to Lawrence v. Texas--in which the Supreme Court struck down all 13...

  • "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," the Supreme Court, and Lawrence the "Laggard". Hagedorn, Audrey K. // Indiana Law Journal;Spring2012, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p795 

    The article mentions about the end of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT), the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court-s landmark decision on Lawrence v. Texas invalidating a Texas law which treats sodomy as illegal. Also discussed is the future of...

  • Sex and Marriage... and Mr. Bailey.  // Transgender Tapestry;Winter2004, Issue 104, p5 

    Discusses the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Lawrence v. Texas case on gay rights and on the transgender community. Court cases relevant to the issues of sex and marriage faced by the transgender community; Comment regarding the book "The Man Who Would Be Queen: The...

  • What Supreme Court Ruling? Gregory, Sean // Time International (Atlantic Edition);8/12/2013, Vol. 182 Issue 7, p12 

    The article discusses the arrests of at least 12 men by the East Baton Rouge Parish sheriff's office in Louisiana since 2011 under the state's sodomy law despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2003 case Lawrence v. Texas invalidated state laws which prohibit gay sex.

  • What Supreme Court Ruling? Gregory, Sean // Time International (Asia Edition);8/12/2013, Vol. 182 Issue 7, p12 

    The article discusses the arrests of at least 12 men by the East Baton Rouge Parish sheriff's office in Louisiana since 2011 under the state's sodomy law despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2003 case Lawrence v. Texas invalidated state laws which prohibit gay sex.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics