Hit that planet

Stock, Mark
July 1991
New Scientist;7/13/91, Vol. 131 Issue 1777, p3
Presents a letter to the editor regarding the magnetic field of the planet Mercury, published in the June 1, 1991 issue of 'New Scientist.'


Related Articles

  • More on seeing Mercury. Vetterlein, John C. // Journal of the British Astronomical Association;Feb2007, Vol. 117 Issue 1, p38 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article on Mercury by Chris Hooker which was previously published in the journal.

  • Seeing Mercury: I. Vetterlein, John C. // Journal of the British Astronomical Association;Oct2006, Vol. 116 Issue 5, p271 

    A letter to the editor regarding observation of Mercury in the sky is presented.

  • Seeing Mercury: II. Kollerstrom, Nicholas // Journal of the British Astronomical Association;Oct2006, Vol. 116 Issue 5, p271 

    A letter to the editor regarding the planet Mercury which is considered as the planet that disgraces the reputation of the astrologers is presented.

  • 'GoTo' telescopes and locating objects in daylight. John C. Vetterlein // Journal of the British Astronomical Association;Dec2007, Vol. 117 Issue 6, p345 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to Chris Hooker's method on locating the planet Mercury in the 2007 issue.

  • The Magnetic Field of Mercury. Anderson, Brian J.; Acuña, Mario H.; Korth, Haje; Slavin, James A.; Uno, Hideharu; Johnson, Catherine L.; Purucker, Michael E.; Solomon, Sean C.; Raines, Jim M.; Zurbuchen, Thomas H.; Gloeckler, George; McNutt, Jr., Ralph L. // Space Science Reviews;May2010, Vol. 152 Issue 1-4, p307 

    The magnetic field strength of Mercury at the planet’s surface is approximately 1% that of Earth’s surface field. This comparatively low field strength presents a number of challenges, both theoretically to understand how it is generated and observationally to distinguish the...

  • Thermal Evolution and Magnetic Field Generation in Terrestrial Planets and Satellites. Breuer, Doris; Labrosse, Stephane; Spohn, Tilman // Space Science Reviews;May2010, Vol. 152 Issue 1-4, p449 

    Of the terrestrial planets, Earth and Mercury have self-sustained fields while Mars and Venus do not. Magnetic field data recorded at Ganymede have been interpreted as evidence of a self-generated magnetic field. The other icy Galilean satellites have magnetic fields induced in their subsurface...

  • Occurrence rate of magnetic holes between 0.72 and 1AU: comparative study of Cluster and VEX data. Amariutei, O. A.; Walker, S. N.; Zhang, T. L. // Annales Geophysicae (09927689);May2011, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p717 

    Localised depressions in the magnetic field magnitude, or magnetic holes, are common features in many regions of solar system plasma. Two distinct mechanisms for their generation have been proposed. The first proposed that the structures are generated locally, close to the point of observation....

  • Magnetic Mercury sticks around. Grossman, Lisa // New Scientist;5/16/2015, Vol. 226 Issue 3021, p1 

    The article discusses a report published in "Science" by researcher Catherine Johnson on the planet Mercury's magnetic field generated by its liquid iron core throughout its nearly 4 billion year planetary history, noting U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Messenger...

  • Large Magnetic Fields in Small Spaces. Norbeck, Edwin // Physics Today;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p11 

    The article presents a letter to the editor about magnetic fields in small spaces.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics