TITLE

Letter to the Editor Review Papers

AUTHOR(S)
Ramos Paja, Carlos Andrés
PUB. DATE
June 2014
SOURCE
Dyna;Jun2014, Vol. 81 Issue 185, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter to the Editor
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the editorial in the February 2014 issue, which discussed the journal's revised aims and scope.
ACCESSION #
97250675

 

Related Articles

  • Using and Interpreting Journal Rankings: Introduction. Hudson, John; Laband, David N. // Economic Journal;Aug2013, Vol. 123 Issue 570, pF199 

    An introduction is presented for the August 2013 issue's special section of articles focusing on the interpretation of scholarly journal rankings, citing contributions by John Hudson, David Laband, and Daniel Sgroi.

  • Online Posting, Single-Blind Review, Open Access, and the Future of Refereed Journals. Ha, Louisa // Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly;Mar2020, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p5 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses the future of refereed journals and topics within the issue, including media ethics.

  • Issue Information.  // Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing;Jun2012, Vol. 12 Issue 8, pi 

    The article presents information on the publication. Lists are presented of its editors, the members of its advisory board and the members of its editorial board for peer review. The editorial policies of the publication are discussed. Copyright and photocopying information is presented, as is a...

  • A Field Guide for the Review Process: Writing and Responding to Peer Reviews. BAGCHI, RAJESH; BLOCK, LAUREN; HAMILTON, REBECCA W.; OZANNE, JULIE L. // Journal of Consumer Research;Feb2017, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p860 

    The peer review process--both writing reviews for academic journals and responding to reviews of one's own work--is fundamental to building scientific knowledge. In this article, we explain why you should invest time reviewing, how to write a constructive review, and how to respond effectively...

  • Theory in Educational History. Tamura, Eileen H. // History of Education Quarterly;May2011, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p145 

    In this article, the guest editor discusses the process used to select the content of the issue and presents brief profiles of the contributors to the issue. The essays and responses were presented to authors in such a way as to ensure that the scholars would not be influenced by each others'...

  • Editor's Message.  // International Journal of Accounting Information Science & Leader;Sep2011, Vol. 4 Issue 10, preceding p1 

    The article offers the author's insights on the "Journal of Accounting Information Science and Leadership," (IJAISL). The author says that the IJAISL is an intellectually reviewed periodical of modern research on quantitative accounting, information science, and qualitative leadership practices....

  • Annual Report and Editorial Commentary for The Accounting Review. DeFond, Mark L. // Accounting Review;Nov2015, Vol. 90 Issue 6, p2603 

    The article offers information about the publication during the tenure of the author as senior editor beginning in 2014. It discusses changes made in its editorial processes in areas including how incoming manuscripts are assigned to editors and how reviewers for manuscripts are selected. It...

  • Editorial Note. Miller, Cristanne // Emily Dickinson Journal;2011, Vol. 20 Issue 1, preceding p1 

    The author reflects on efforts by the "Emily Dickinson Journal" to enter the digital age. According to the author, the journal received invitation from Johns Hopkins University press to participate in a web-based journal and peer review tool for academic publishers and societies called Scholar...

  • Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter // PLoS ONE;2010, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p1 

    Background: Ratings in journal peer review can be affected by sources of bias. The bias variable investigated here was the information on whether authors had suggested a possible reviewer for their manuscript, and whether the editor had taken up that suggestion or had chosen a reviewer that had...

  • IN REFEREES WE TRUST? Baldwin, Melinda // Physics Today;Feb2017, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p44 

    The article discusses the history of journal refereeing, highlighting the proposal of English polymath William Whewell to the Royal Society of London to commission written reports on papers to be published in "Philosophical Transactions" magazine in 1831. Topics include the concerns of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics