TITLE

Sex selection from Islamic point of view

AUTHOR(S)
Dezhkam, Lotfollah; Dezhkam, Hakime; Dezhkam, Iman
PUB. DATE
April 2014
SOURCE
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine;Apr2014, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p289
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter to the Editor
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article on the methods to select the sex of fetus before implantation.
ACCESSION #
96703673

 

Related Articles

  • Sexing the cherry. Lord, Melody // Australia's Parents;Apr/May97, Issue 98, p62 

    Focuses on the development of more reliable methods of sex selection. Traditional methods used in sex selection; Ratio of the number of boys to girls; Possible scenario when males become the preferred sex.

  • The spin on sperm. Abbasi, Kamran // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/22/97, Vol. 315 Issue 7119, p1386 

    Reports on RightBaby's launch of the Selnas Method gender selection technique. Explanation of the mechanics of the technique by scientist Patrick Schoun; Critics' allegation that the technique is being promoted without peer review; Inadequacy of the company's references for the method.

  • China: Province bans sex selection.  // Off Our Backs;Jul96, Vol. 26 Issue 7, p3 

    Presents an excerpt from the article entitled `China: Province bans sex selection,'published in the June 7 issue of `The New York Times,' concerning the banning of tests to determine the sex of fetuses in China's Fujian province.

  • Sex selection: What do you want?  // Australia's Parents;Feb/Mar97, Issue 97, p56 

    Focuses on sex preselection. Factors affecting parents' choice of sex for an unborn child; Related services provided by sex clinics in Hong Kong.

  • Sperm-sorting fails to separate boys from girls. Vines, Gail // New Scientist;6/4/94, Vol. 142 Issue 1928, p8 

    Reports on claims on the ineffectivity of techniques used on sperm-sorting in gender selection clinics. Defense of techniques by Alan Rose, medical adviser to the London Gender Clinic; Albumin treatment of sperm.

  • Sex Preselection in New York City: Who Chooses Which Sex and Why.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;1/12/90, Vol. 263 Issue 2, p301 

    Presents an abstract of the study 'Sex Preselection in New York City: Who Chooses Which Sex and Why,' published in an issue of the 'International Journal of Fertility.'

  • Preselection of Sex. Steinbacher, Roberta // Sciences;Apr80, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p6 

    Examines social consequences on preselection of offspring sex. Methods on determining sex; Impact of technology on sex determination; Implication of sex preselection technology use for male and female ratio imbalance.

  • Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany. E. Dahl; M. Beutel; B. Brosig; Hinsch K.-D. // Human Reproduction;Oct2003, Vol. 18 Issue 10, p2231 

    BACKGROUND: Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons raises serious moral, legal and social issues. The main concern is based on the assumption that a freely available service for sex selection will distort the natural sex ratio and lead to a severe gender imbalance. However, for a...

  • PANEL ON PRE--PREGNANCY GENDER SELECTION. Davis, Dena; McGee, Glenn; Robertson, John A. // Texas Journal of Women & the Law;Spring99, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p267 

    Discusses issues on pre-pregnancy gender selection. Reasons for opposing sex selection; Factors which affect parenthood; Application of technologies; Legal issues on selecting offspring characteristics.

  • Gender Selection: Is There a European View? Cohen, Jean // Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics;Sep2002, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p417 

    There is no European view on gender selection. Conclusions of the ESHRE Ethics Task force are reported.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics