TITLE

Commonwealth vs. Hamilton Manufacturing Company

PUB. DATE
August 2017
SOURCE
Commonwealth vs. Hamilton Manufacturing Company;8/1/2017, p383
SOURCE TYPE
Primary Source Document
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
Provides information on the lawsuit filed against the Hamilton Manufacturing Co. by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Complaint against the Lowell, Massachusetts firm for having a woman work in its factory for more than 60 hours a week; The relevant statute; Arguments of the plaintiff and the defendant; More information.
ACCESSION #
21213042

 

Related Articles

  • Chart removal for trip home costs £700.  // Commercial Motor;10/20/2005, Vol. 202 Issue 0000, p39 

    This article presents a case involving a man who removed the chart from his tachograph before driving home when he had finished his delivery. Gareth Reeve, of Nutwick Road, Havant, pleaded guilty before the Hertford magistrates to two offenses of knowingly making a false record, one of exceeding...

  • Wages...Hours.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr56, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p245 

    The article presents courts' decisions and rulings concerning wage and hours of labor in the U.S. In ruling that a guaranteed weekly wage contract need not result in the payment of anything extra as overtime to qualify under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the New Orleans federal appellate court...

  • FAIR LABOR LAWS STILL APPLY. Allen, John // Smart Business Houston;Aug2012, p8 

    The article reports on the increase in class-action lawsuits where 85 percent of employment class-action lawsuits account for supposed wage and hour laws violations in the U.S. Presented are tips on how to prevent such litigations which is reported to have an average settlement of almost 13...

  • Limiting pay in lieu of holiday entitlement.  // British Baker;5/21/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 9, Special section p2 

    The article discusses the court case Ton Ren Tang (UK) v. Wang in Great Britain which involved the amount the employee should receive for untaken holidays on termination of her employment. The employee claimed she was informed by her employer that she was entitled to 30 days' paid annual leave...

  • Changing an employee's duties may require changing his FLSA classification.  // HR Specialist: Ohio Employment Law;Aug2009, Vol. 3 Issue 8, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff alleged that she should have been categorized as a nonexempt hourly employee in the U.S. The plaintiff remarked that he responsibilities and duties had altered many times and contended that she should have been categorized as hourly. The...

  • ATA Intervenes on HOS.  // Traffic World;4/24/2006, Vol. 270 Issue 17, p13 

    The article reports on the intervention of the American Trucking Associations Inc. in the case concerning truck driver hours of service rules filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The association takes the side of the federal government against the...

  • California Supreme Court Ruling on Missed Meal and Rest Breaks Impacts Employers Nationwide. Kearns, Jennifer A. // Shopping Center Legal Update;Summer2007, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p12 

    The article reports on a ruling by the California Supreme Court on missed meal and rest breaks. It stated that the state's wage orders provides that non-exempt workers are entitled to two 10-minute breaks for eight hours worked, and a half-hour meal break if they work a shift of five or more...

  • We Need a Petrillo Law That's Judge-Proof.  // Saturday Evening Post;2/14/1948, Vol. 220 Issue 33, p128 

    The article presents a discussion on a version of the Petrillo case, where it needs to be amended, as of February 14, 1948. It is presently declared as "unlawful to employ persons in excess of the actual number needed to perform actual services." The article suggests that it is the...

  • Cases clarify Duty of Care.  // Contract Journal;5/16/2007, Vol. 438 Issue 6625, p23 

    The article focuses on two court cases which helped clarify where duty of care begins and ends under the Working Time Regulations in Great Britain. An agricultural firm was fined £30,000 after admitting of their failure to ensure the health of workers and the public--even though the worker...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics