TITLE

Schenck v. United States; Baer v. United States

PUB. DATE
August 2017
SOURCE
Schenck v. United States; Baer v. United States;8/1/2017, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Primary Source Document
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
Presents the text of the summary decision of the United States Supreme Court in 1919 in two cases, Schenck v. United States and Baer v. United States. Cases dealing with the distribution of materials through the public mails in violation of the 1917 Espionage Act; Issues involved; Decision of the court.
ACCESSION #
21212930

 

Related Articles

  • Schenck v. United States Baer v. Same.  // Communications & the Law;Dec99, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p39 

    Focuses on the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the cases of `Schenck v. United States' and `Baer v. United States.' Details of the charges against Schenck and Baer, who were convicted in violation of the Espionage Act; Arguments of the defense.

  • Clear and Present Dangers: The Importance of Ideas and the Bowels in the Cosmos. Baker, Thomas E. // Constitutional Commentary;Winter99, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p485 

    Focuses on the contributions of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Learned Hand in the constitutional law of the United States. Holmes' First Amendment opinion in the case Schenck versus United States; Two cases where Holmes applied his clear and present danger test; Dissenting opinion of...

  • Q: What's the most important Supreme Court case no one's ever heard of?  // Atlantic;May2013, Vol. 311 Issue 4, p96 

    Answers are presented to a question regarding suggestions for important U.S. Supreme Court cases such as Schenck v. United States, First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, and Wickard v. Filburn.

  • REDISH ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Alexander, Larry // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 107 Issue 2, p593 

    My contribution to this Festschrift for Marry Redish looks at two of his most important articles on freedom of speech, both published in 1982. One article deals with free speech and advocacy of crime, while the other presents Marty's general justificatory theory of freedom of speech. Although I...

  • The Absence of the First Amendment in Schenck v. United States: A Reexamination. Cohen, Jeremy // American Journalism;1985, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p49 

    The article focuses on the reexamination regarding the absence of the first amendment in the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919. It states that the said case was the first time that the Supreme Court made a lower decision to jail individuals under the federal espionage...

  • Putting Fire & Brimstone on Ice: The Restriction of Chaplain Speech During Religious Worship Services. Schauss, Michael E. // Army Lawyer;Feb2013, p17 

    The article discusses American constitutional law and the First Amendment to the nation's Constitution in relation to the U.S. armed forces' reported restrictions on the free speech rights of military chaplains during religious worship services as of February 2013. Order and discipline are...

  • In the Line of Fire: Reconsidering the Holmes of Schenck and the Holmes of Abrams. Dewberry, David R. // Free Speech Yearbook;2005, Vol. 42, p17 

    The article focuses on the importance of the First Amendment in the U.S. in lawsuits related to free speech. The judgments delivered by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes illustrate the significance of the First Amendment in such cases. Holmes had given different rulings for same type of trials....

  • Houston, East and West Texas Railway Company v. United States.  // Houston, East & West Texas Railway Company v. United States;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the text of Houston, East and West Railway Company v. United States, a 1914 decision of the United States Supreme Court dealing with interstate commerce. The issues involved in the case; Decision of the court.

  • Railroad Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company.  // Railroad Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Chicago, Burlington &;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the text of Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a 1922 United States Supreme Court case regarding interstate commerce. Question of the right of Wisconsin to set railroad rates without federal government interference; Other issues in the...

Share

Other Topics