TITLE

Sedition Act

PUB. DATE
August 2017
SOURCE
Sedition Act;8/1/2017, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Primary Source Document
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
The article presents the text of the Sedition Act passed July 14, 1798. The first section of the act says that, as enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, any persons who conspire to oppose any measure of the U.S. government directed by proper authority, impede the operation of any U.S. law, threaten or prevent any official from performing their duty, or attempt to cause an insurrection, riot, or unlawful assembly, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor and be punished by a fine of up to five thousand dollars and a prison sentence between six months and five years. Section two of the act defines the law against false, scandalous and malicious writing against the United States government and the consequences for violation.
ACCESSION #
21212303

 

Related Articles

  • Free speech's first test. Hanson, Freya Ottem // Cobblestone;Jan1998, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p4 

    Discusses the history on how freedom of speech passed its major first test in the United States. Challenges met by freedom of speech under the administration of President John Adams; Provisions under the Alien and Sedition Acts passed by Federalists in 1798; Several questions raised by the...

  • The loophole we can't close. Starr, Paul // American Prospect;Jan/Feb98, Issue 36, p6 

    Presents the author's perception regarding the Sedition Act of 1798. Significance to political speech; Why the act was deemed a political failure; Suggested impact on governmental proceedings.

  • Mr. Starr's rendition of the Sedition Act. Schorr, Daniel // Christian Science Monitor;3/6/98, Vol. 90 Issue 69, p15 

    Expresses relief that the Sedition Act of 1798 is not still in effect in the United States in 1998. What that act prohibited; How it could be misused, particularly by independent counselor Kenneth Starr; What Richard Nixon might have done with a Sedition Act.

  • ANNALS OF LAW: THE LIBERTY OF EVERY MAN-II. Harris, Richard // New Yorker;11/10/1975, Vol. 51 Issue 38, p54 

    The article relates the experience of Alan McSurely and his wife when they were arrested in the summer of 1967 and charged with sedition against the State of Kentucky for their attempts to organize poor people and persuade them to demand their rights as citizens. The couple were confident that...

  • LA SEDITION ACT DE 1798 Y EL LIBELO SEDICIOSO: LA CRIMINALIZACIÓN DE LA LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIÓN. Castaño, Abel Arias // Historia Constitucional;2009, Vol. 10, p297 

    It is a common-place in the American Constitutional Law to state that the Sedition Act of 1798 constitutes a crucial landmark in the history of the freedom of speech in this country. The paper analyzes the historical context that surrounds the enactment of the law and its similarities and...

  • Order vs. liberty. Gragg, Larry // American History;Oct98, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p24 

    Discusses the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 in the United States which opened a debate about the limits of freedom in a free society. Provisions under the bill; Incident which made the passage of a sedition bill easier; Identification of newspaper editors who were indicted...

  • New York bombing trial of 12 men opens, tests Civil War Sedition Law. Scherer, Ron // Christian Science Monitor;1/30/95, Vol. 87 Issue 44, p3 

    Focuses on the trial of men charged with blowing up national buildings of the United States and violation of the Civil War Sedition law. Strategy of the prosecutors; Task before the defense lawyers.

  • Resolutions in General Assembly.  // Resolutions in General Assembly;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the Resolutions made in General Assembly protesting the alien and sedition laws of 1798. Resolutions on the proper role of the federal government.

  • Persuasion vs. Power to Suppress.  // Public Relations Quarterly;Summer66, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p32 

    Focuses on the article 'Congressional History of the 1798 Sedition Law,' by John D. Stevens in the 'Journalism Quarterly,' volume 43, number 2. Outlawing of some forms of free expression and of public debate; Test of the protections previously existent for those who wished to express themselves...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics