TITLE

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION v. VELAZQUEZ et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals to the second circuit

PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Law
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Legal Services Corporation v. Velasquez et al., case number 99-603, argued on October 4, 2000 and decided on February 28, 2001. The respondents, who were lawyers employed by petitioner Legal Services Corp. grantees, filed suit against the decision of Congress to prohibit Legal Services Corp. funding of any organization that challenges existing welfare law. The District Court denied the respondents a preliminary injunction, but the restriction was nullified by the Second Circuit.
ACCESSION #
19071035

 

Related Articles

  • LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION v. VELAZQUEZ et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals to the second circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Legal Services Corporation v. Velasquez et al., case number 99-603, argued on October 4, 2000 and decided on February 28, 2001. The respondents, who were lawyers employed by petitioner Legal Services Corp. grantees, filed suit against...

  • Inside the Supreme Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Dec2000, Vol. 3 Issue 9, p258 

    Presents a list of cases that have been granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court as of December 2000. Overview of the violation of first amendment in United States v. Carmen Velazquez; Discussion on the Clean Air Act in Browner v. American Trucking Associations Inc.; Assessment of rights of...

  • Advocacy as a Race to the Bottom: Rethinking Limits on Lawyers' Free Speech. MARGULIES, PETER // University of Memphis Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p319 

    The article focuses on the lawyers' free speech and its limitation by the U.S. law. It discusses the efforts of lawyers' treatment on First Amendment and differentiates between solicitation of clients which is prohibited by law and solicitation in public interest which is allowed by law. It...

  • The Walker case.  // Columbia Journalism Review;Fall1966, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p2 

    This article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review a court case concerning the $500,000 libel award made by a Texas jury to retired major General Edwin A. Walker at the expense of The Associated Press in September 1966. The suit was but one of fifteen, totaling at one time...

  • Attorneys' Fees.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug83, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p540 

    The article discusses the judgments pronounced by the U.S. Supreme Court, that have delivered regarding the cases of attorney's fees. The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision in Manhart V. Los Angeles, which affirmed an award of attorneys' fees to claimants who prevailed on a...

  • Breach of Contract, Fair Representation.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug83, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p543 

    The article discusses judgments related to breach of contract, which have been delivered by various courts of the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of "Del Costello v. Teamsters" that the six-month limitations period of Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act...

  • Look Again: Using Existing Statutory Authority to Protect Isolated Wetlands. SEAY, JOHN ERIC // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p20 

    The article focuses on the concern over the protection of isolated wetlands. It mentions the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court on two court case which created confusion over whether geographically isolated wetlands are protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA). It indicates the role of...

  • Key cases loom for auto, power, solid waste sectors. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;1/8/2007, Vol. 12 Issue 18, p13 

    The article reports that judgments from the U.S. Supreme Court in 2007 will have significant impact on the automobile, power and solid waste sectors. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the lawsuit United Haulers v. the Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Authority of New York on January 8,...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Approves Challenging Unconstitutional State Tax Breaks in Federal Court. Baker, M. Miller; Goldman, William L.; Griswold, Donald M.; Nadel, Michael S. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q2, p1 

    The article discusses the case Hibbs v. Winn, in which the U.S. Supreme Court approved challenging unconstitutional state tax breaks in federal court. Background information on the case is presented. Under the ruling, state taxes can be challenged on other grounds including unfair apportionment,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics