TITLE

Medical malpractice litigation: do the British have a better remedy?

AUTHOR(S)
Miller, Frances H.; Miller, F H
PUB. DATE
January 1986
SOURCE
American Journal of Law & Medicine;1986, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p433
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
Medical malpractice claims are filed nearly ten times more frequently in America than they are in Great Britain. British patients generally adopt a less adversarial stance toward medical malpractice than do American patients. This Article examines the British malpractice system, as compared with the American system, and explores the differences between the two, in terms of costs and fees, liability rules, statutory provisions, and judicial attitudes toward malpractice litigation. The Article also discusses British social and institutional factors, such as the "taint" of litigation and the National Health Service, and evaluates how these factors affect British malpractice litigation. The Article presents the alternative forums available to British patients in seeking satisfaction for their medical service complaints. The Article concludes with an evaluation of how these factors achieve the three societal objectives of malpractice litigation: reparation, emotional vindication and deterrence.
ACCESSION #
6335085

 

Related Articles

  • Drums begin to beat in the waiting list jungle. Dalziel, Maureen; Kerr, R. // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);3/21/1987, Vol. 294 Issue 6574, p722 

    Focuses on the radical change in medical malpractice on shortening the time patients wait for treatment and investigation in the National Health Services (NHS) in Great Britain. Difficulties encountered on the information system in NHS; Proposal on solving the recent ills in NHS; Risk on giving...

  • Bournewood carers say justice has not been done. Snell, Janet // Learning Disability Today;Oct2008, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p10 

    The article deals with the report of the serious case review into the Bournewood case which calls for all managers, especially care managers, to "act assertively and proactively" to protect vulnerable clients in National Health Service (NHS) care in Great Britain. Despite protestations by Mr and...

  • NHS staff should inform patients of negligent acts. Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);7/5/2003, Vol. 327 Issue 7405, p7 

    Reports that Great Britain's National Health Service (NHS) have begin requiring physicians to tell patients when a negligent act or omission causes harm. Creation of compensation packages; How patients covered by the proposed new redress will have the option of litigation.

  • A&E Doctor not negligent: Mungai v Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust (High Court, 26/1/06 – Judge Price QC).  // Clinical Risk;Mar2007, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p81 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff alleged against the physician of Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust took an inadequate history and a blood sample was supposed to be taken. It is claimed that blood test would have revealed an increased white blood cell count and...

  • Infected cornea graft – no negligence or breach of statutory duty: Ndri v Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Trust (High Court, 24/11/06 – Sir Douglas Brown). Whitfield, Adrian; Colin, Giles // Clinical Risk;Jul2007, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p167 

    The article discusses the case, Ndri v Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Trust, in Great Britain. The claimant made negligence allegation against Moorfields, after she developed endopthalmitis and lost eye sight, due to the infected tissue used when she had corneal graft. Her main...

  • Case: Failure to diagnose and treat Candida Endophthalmitis.  // Clinical Risk;Jul2007, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p161 

    The article presents the case of a man with cerebral palsy who filed complaints of negligence against the Royal Shrewsburry Hospitals National Health Service Trust in Great Britain. The claimant filed the complaint after the hospital failed to diagnose and treat his Candida Endopthalmitis which...

  • Claims for the cost of care: local authority provision. Spencer, Martin // Clinical Risk;Jul2007, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p154 

    The article offers a report on the Crofton v National Health Service Litigation Authority case. The section examines the correct approach in assessing the cost of care following the Court of Appeal decision on the case. It lists several potential mechanisms for resolving the current...

  • Healthcare and Law Digest: Editorial. Mead, John // Clinical Risk;Nov2008, Vol. 14 Issue 6, p251 

    The article focuses on the annual reports and accounts of the National Health Service Litigation Authority in Great Britain. It is argued that the NHSLA has paid no less than £90.7 million in claimant costs on clinical negligence cases compared with £83.3 million in 2006-2007. Several...

  • A �Right� to Legal Representation (in the Workplace) during Disciplinary Proceedings? SANDERS, ASTRID // Industrial Law Journal;Jun2010, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p166 

    The article discusses two court cases which focus on the workplace disciplinary proceedings in Great Britain. In the cases Kulkarni v. Milton Keynes NHS Trust and R v. Governors of X School, the employees filed complaints of sexual misconduct at the workplace. The rulings in these cases,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics