TITLE

Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research?

AUTHOR(S)
Binik, Ariella; Weijer, Charles; McRae, Andrew D; Grimshaw, Jeremy M; Boruch, Robert; Brehaut, Jamie C; Donner, Allan; Eccles, Martin P; Saginur, Raphael; Taljaard, Monica; Zwarenstein, Merrick
PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
Trials;2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p118
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
This article is part of a series of papers examining ethical issues in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) in health research. In the introductory paper in this series, Weijer and colleagues set out six areas of inquiry that must be addressed if the cluster trial is to be set on a firm ethical foundation. This paper addresses the third of the questions posed, namely, does clinical equipoise apply to CRTs in health research? The ethical principle of beneficence is the moral obligation not to harm needlessly and, when possible, to promote the welfare of research subjects. Two related ethical problems have been discussed in the CRT literature. First, are control groups that receive only usual care unduly disadvantaged? Second, when accumulating data suggests the superiority of one intervention in a trial, is there an ethical obligation to act?In individually randomized trials involving patients, similar questions are addressed by the concept of clinical equipoise, that is, the ethical requirement that, at the start of a trial, there be a state of honest, professional disagreement in the community of expert practitioners as to the preferred treatment. Since CRTs may not involve physician-researchers and patient-subjects, the applicability of clinical equipoise to CRTs is uncertain. Here we argue that clinical equipoise may be usefully grounded in a trust relationship between the state and research subjects, and, as a result, clinical equipoise is applicable to CRTs. Clinical equipoise is used to argue that control groups receiving only usual care are not disadvantaged so long as the evidence supporting the experimental and control interventions is such that experts would disagree as to which is preferred. Further, while data accumulating during the course of a CRT may favor one intervention over another, clinical equipoise supports continuing the trial until the results are likely to be broadly convincing, often coinciding with the planned completion of the trial. Finally, clinical equipoise provides research ethics committees with formal and procedural guidelines that form an important part of the assessment of the benefits and harms of CRTs in health research.
ACCESSION #
62825767

 

Related Articles

  • Improving the pre-screening of eligible patients in order to increase enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Campillo-Gimenez, Boris; Buscail, Camille; Zekri, Oussama; Laguerre, Brigitte; Le PrisĂ©, Elisabeth; De Crevoisier, Renaud; Cuggia, Marc // Trials;2015, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p304 

    Background The performance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is often hindered by recruitment difficulties. This study aims to explore the pre-screening phase of four prostate cancer RCTs to identify the impact of a systematic pre-selection of eligible patients for RCT recruitment. Methods...

  • An Honest Response--Placebos and IBS. Greenfield, Russel H. // Alternative Medicine Alert;Feb2011, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p20 

    THE AUTHORS OF THIS RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, SINGLE center study sought to assess the feasibility of recruiting people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) to participate in a trial of open-label placebo, and to evaluate whether an open-label placebo pill combined with a persuasive rationale would...

  • Research digest. Spencer-Walsh, Louise // Paediatric Nursing;Mar2011, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p10 

    The article presents different studies related to pediatrics. These are "How Do Parents Experience Beng Asked to Enter A Child in A Randomized Controlled Trial?" which aims to look at how parents handle trials, and another titled "Parental Attitudes Towards and Perceptions of Their Children's...

  • Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research. Weijer, Charles; Grimshaw, Jeremy M; Taljaard, Monica; Binik, Ariella; Boruch, Robert; Brehaut, Jamie C; Donner, Allan; Eccles, Martin P; Gallo, Antonio; McRae, Andrew D; Saginur, Raphael; Zwarenstein, Merrick // Trials;2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p100 

    The cluster randomized trial (CRT) is used increasingly in knowledge translation research, quality improvement research, community based intervention studies, public health research, and research in developing countries. However, cluster trials raise difficult ethical issues that challenge...

  • Clinical research must include more older people. McMurdo, Marion // BMJ: British Medical Journal;6/29/2013, Vol. 346 Issue 7914, p27 

    In this article the author focuses on inclusion of older people in clinical research. It states that exclusion of older people from research leads to void in information. It mentions that healthcare professionals are unable to prescribe a treatment for older people as there is lack of relevant...

  • Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridges. Patterson, Sue; Mairs, Hilary; Borschmann, Rohan // BMC Medical Research Methodology;2011, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p73 

    Background: The pragmatic randomised controlled trial is widely regarded as the gold standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of health care interventions. Successful conduct of trials and generalisation of findings depends upon efficient recruitment of representative samples, which...

  • Use and Interpretation of Composite End Points in Orthopaedic Trials. Busse, Jason W.; Bhandari, Mohit; Ferreira-González, Ignacio; Montori, Victor M.; Guyatt, Gordon H. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p65 

    Randomized controlled trials in orthopaedics are often underpowered to detect important differences in outcomes. Composite end points (CEPs) hold promise as a strategy to address this issue by combining multiple end points into one measure, thus increasing the observed event rate. The use of...

  • Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study. Eborall, Helen C.; Stewart, Marlene C. W.; Cunningham-Burley, Sarah; Price, Jackie F.; Fowkes, F. Gerry R. // Trials;2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Recruitment and retention of participants are critical to the success of a randomised controlled trial. Gaining the views of potential trial participants who decline to enter a trial and of trial participants who stop the trial treatment is important and can help to improve study...

  • A randomised evaluation of CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with sub-threshold depression (CASPER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.  // Trials;2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p225 

    The article presents a study that evaluates Collaborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with sub-threshold depression (CASPER). In the study a randomised controlled multi-centre trial was undertaken and 540 patients are selected for the CASPER trial. Results through...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics