TITLE

Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis

AUTHOR(S)
Targarona, Eduardo Ma; Balague, Carmen; Marin, Juan; Neto, Rene Berindoague; Martinez, Carmen; Garriga, Jordi; Trias, Manuel
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
Surgical Innovation;Dec2005, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p339
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
The development of operative laparoscopic surgery is linked to advances in ancillary surgical instrumentation. Ultrasonic energy devices avoid the use of electricity and provide effective control of small- to medium-sized vessels. Bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgical technology eliminates the disadvantages of electrical energy, and a mechanical blade adds a cutting action. This instrument can provide effective hemostasis of large vessels up to 7 mm. Such devices significantly increase the cost of laparoscopic procedures, however, and the amount of evidence-based information on this topic is surprisingly scarce. This study compared the effectiveness of three different energy sources on the laparoscopic performance of a left colectomy. The trial included 38 nonselected patients with a disease of the colon requiring an elective segmental left-sided colon resection. Patients were preoperatively randomized into three groups. Group I had electrosurgery; vascular dissection was performed entirely with an electrosurgery generator, and vessels were controlled with clips. Group II underwent computer-controlled bipolar electrosurgery; vascular and mesocolon section was completed by using the 10-mm Ligasure device aione. In group III, 5-mm ultrasonic shears (Harmonic Scalpel) were used for bowel dissection, vascular pedicle dissection, and mesocolon transection. The mesenteric vessel pedicle was controlled with an endostapler. Demographics (age, sex, body mass index, comorbidity, previous surgery and diagnoses requiring surgery) were recorded, as were surgical details (operative time, conversion, blood loss), additional disposable instruments (number of trocars, EndoGIA charges, and clip appliers), and clinical outcome. Intraoperative economic costs were also evaluated. End points of the trial were operative time and intraoperative blood loss, and an intention-to-treat principle was followed. The three groups were well matched for demographic and pathologic features. Surgical time was significantly longer in patients operated on with conventional electrosurgery vs the Harmonic Scalpel or computed-based bipolar energy devices. This finding correlated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss. Conversion to other endoscopic techniques was more frequent in Group I; however, conversion to open surgery was similar in ail three groups. No intraoperative accident related to the use of the specific device was observed in any group. Immediate outcome was similar in the three groups, without differences in morbidity, mortality, or hospital stay. Analysis of operative costs showed no significant differences between the three groups. High-energy power sources specifically adapted for endoscopic surgery reduce operative time and blood loss and may be considered cost-effective when left colectomy is used as a model.
ACCESSION #
19487628

 

Related Articles

  • Effects of preoperative carbohydrates drinks on immediate postoperative outcome after day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Singh, Basant; Dahiya, Divya; Bagaria, Dinesh; Saini, Vikas; Kaman, Lileswar; Kaje, Vivek; Vagadiya, Ankur; Sarin, Shawashat; Edwards, Roger; Attri, Vishal; Jain, Kajal; Singh, Basant Narayan // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2015, Vol. 29 Issue 11, p3267 

    Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting is the most common cause for unexpected hospital admission of patients undergoing day care surgery. Overnight fasting changes patient metabolic state and influences their perioperative stress response. Preoperative carbohydrate loading...

  • Robotic sacrocolpopexy a worthy option vs laparoscopy?  // PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News;Feb2014, Vol. 696 Issue 1, p6 

    The article discusses the study "Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial" in the January 1, 2014 issue of "Obstetrics and Gynecology." Short-term outcomes and complication rates in the use of robotic sacrocolpopexy and conventional laparoscopic procedure...

  • Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Celentano, Valerio; Giglio, Mariano; Bucci, Luigi // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Dec2015, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p1603 

    Background: Hartmann's reversal is a major surgical procedure with consistent morbidity and mortality rates. Laparoscopy has been extensively applied to colorectal surgery providing significant benefits on short- and long-term outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of the current evidence...

  • Thoracoscopic traction technique in long gap esophageal atresia: entering a new era. Zee, David; Gallo, Gabriele; Tytgat, Stefaan; van der Zee, David C; Tytgat, Stefaan H A // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2015, Vol. 29 Issue 11, p3324 

    Objective: To describe the evolution from delayed management of long gap esophageal atresia to thoracoscopic treatment directly after birth without the placement of a gastrostomy.Background: Long gap esophageal atresia remains a challenge for pediatric surgeons. Over...

  • Short and long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of vertical periumbilical wound versus transverse left iliac fossa wound for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic anterior resections. Tan, Wah-Siew; Chew, Min-Hoe; Ho, Kok-Sun; Yatim, Juriyah; Lai, Joanne; Tang, Choong-Leong // Surgical Endoscopy;Sep2015, Vol. 29 Issue 9, p2720 

    Background: The ideal incision for laparoscopic specimen extraction is not known. There has been no randomised study thus far evaluating extraction site in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of our study was to compare post-operative outcomes, pain scores and quality of life scores of...

  • Laparoscopic as good as standard surgery for rectal cancer.  // Gastrointestinal Nursing;Jun2015, Vol. 13 Issue 5, p6 

    The article discusses the article "A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer" by Dr. Jaap Bonjer and colleagues which appeared in a 2015 issue of the "New England Journal of Medicine." Topics mentioned include the results of the Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or...

  • Comparative Study Of Laparoscopic Versus Open Peptic Perforation Closure. Porecha, M. M.; Mehta, S. G.; Udani, Dhaval L.; Mehta, Purvi J.; Patel, Kaushik; Nagre, Suraj // Internet Journal of Surgery;2008, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p17 

    The objective of this study was to find out the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in case of peptic perforation. A study was carried out on 50 patients with peptic perforation; 25 underwent open surgery and 25 laparoscopic surgery. There was a significant difference in the outcome of the...

  • Standardized laparoscopic NOSE-colectomy is feasible with low morbidity. Wolthuis, Albert; Buck van Overstraeten, Anthony; Fieuws, Steffen; Boon, Katrien; D'Hoore, AndrĂ© // Surgical Endoscopy;May2015, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p1167 

    Background: In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, extraction site laparotomy can be avoided by natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) resulting in less postoperative pain, shorter length of stay, and less morbidity such as wound complications. To date, short-term outcome of a large prospective...

  • Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Conventional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Is There Any Real Need to Go Single? CurrĂ², Giuseppe; Cogliandolo, Andrea; Lazzara, Salvatore; La Malfa, Giuseppe; Navarra, Giuseppe // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Sep2012, Vol. 22 Issue 7, p621 

    Background: Preliminary results showed some benefits of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) over conventional laparoscopic colectomy, including better cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery, but these results need further confirmation. In addition, the literature still...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics