TITLE

The use of modeling to understand the impact of screening on U.S. mortality: examples from mammography and PSA testing

AUTHOR(S)
Feuer, Eric J; Etzioni, Ruth; Cronin, Kathleen A.; Mariotto, Angela
PUB. DATE
December 2004
SOURCE
Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Dec2004, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p421
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
Surveillance data represent a vital resource for understanding the impact of cancer control interventions on the population cancer burden. However, population cancer trends are a complex product of many factors, and estimating the contribution of any one of these factors can be challenging. Surveillance modeling is a technique for estimating the contribution of one or more interventions of interest to trends in disease incidence and mortality. In this article, we present several approaches to surveillance modeling of cancer screening interventions. We classify models as biological or epidemiological, depending on whether they model the full unobservable aspects of disease onset and progression, or models which reduce the complex process to simpler terms by summarizing portions of the disease process using mostly observed population level measures. We also describe differences between macrolevel models, microsimulation models and mechanistic models. We discuss procedures for model calibration and validation, and methods for presenting model results which are robust with respect to certain types of biased model estimates. As examples, we present several models of the impact of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality, and PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality. Both these examples are appropriate uses of surveillance modeling, even though for mammography there is extensive (although somewhat controversial) randomized trial evidence, whereas for PSA this biomarker has seen extensive use as a screening test prior to any controlled trial evidence of its efficacy. Some of the models presented here were developed as part of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network.
ACCESSION #
14963489

 

Related Articles

  • Creating Value In Health By Understanding And Overcoming Resistance To De-Innovation. Ubel, Peter A.; Asch, David A. // Health Affairs;Feb2015, Vol. 34 Issue 2, preceding p239 

    As hard as it may be for clinicians to adopt new practices, it is often harder for them to “de-innovate,” or give up old practices, even when new evidence reveals that those practices offer little value. In this article we explore recent controversies over screening for breast and...

  • What You Must Know About Biopsies.  // Consumer Reports on Health;Aug2015, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p6 

    The article focuses on common cancers and the need for screening and biopsies for each. These include breast cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer and thyroid cancer. Topics covered include the recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for women ages 50 to 74 to have mammograms...

  • Study: No significant mortality reduction with RP. Krader, Cheryl Guttman // Urology Times;Sep2011, Vol. 39 Issue 10, p13 

    The article discusses the result of the prospective, randomized Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) which indicates the rate of mortality reduction of radical prostatectomy (RP). The study shows no variation in the effect of RP on mortality, providing a comparison of...

  • Clinical studies should clarify debate on cancer screening, not cloud it. Levy, Abe // Modern Healthcare;3/17/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p27 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Mammography debate heats up with new study" in the February 12, 2014.

  • Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. Porter, Peggy L.; El-Bastawissi, Amira Y.; Porter, P L; El-Bastawissi, A Y; Mandelson, M T; Lin, M G; Khalid, N; Watney, E A; Cousens, L; White, D; Taplin, S; White, E // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;12/01/99, Vol. 91 Issue 23, p2020 

    Background: Although mammographic screening is useful for detecting early breast cancer, some tumors are detected in the interval between screening examinations. This study attempted to characterize fully the tumors detected in the two different manners.Methods: Our...

  • Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study. Klompenhouwer, E.; Duijm, L.; Voogd, A.; Heeten, G.; Nederend, J.; Jansen, F.; Broeders, M. // European Radiology;May2014, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p1097 

    Objectives: Substantial inter-observer variability in screening mammography interpretation has been reported at single reading. However, screening results of pairs of screening radiologists have not yet been published. We determined variations in screening performances among pairs of screening...

  • What's New in ... Quigley, Timothy // JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (;Oct2009, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p50 

    The article presents two studies on the benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. One of the studies reveal that PSA screening did not reduce prostate cancer mortality while the other study showed a 20% reduction in mortality in the subjects who underwent screening....

  • Too much mammography. Kalager, Mette; Adami, Hans-Olov; Bretthauer, Michael // BMJ: British Medical Journal;2/15/2014, Vol. 348 Issue 7945, p8 

    The authors discuss the follow-up to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study published within the issue. They report the 22 percent overdiagnosis in the annual mammography screenings performed and the lack of change in breast cancer mortality recorded. They explore topics including the...

  • The harms and benefits of modern screening mammography. Elmore, Joann G.; Harris, Russell P. // BMJ: British Medical Journal;6/21/2014, Vol. 348 Issue 7963, p9 

    The authors discuss the harms and benefits of mammography screening in which the benefits have been shown to be insignificant while harms are substantial. They cite as basis studies from various sources such as the Independent United Kingdom Panel on Breast Cancer Screening, the Canadian...

  • Experts question IARC report that said benefits of mammography outweigh risks. Mayor, Susan // BMJ: British Medical Journal;6/13/2015, Vol. 350 Issue 8012, ph3156 

    The article looks at questions raised by experts over a summary report on breast screening from the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer which said that the benefits of mammography outweighed the risks for women who are 50 to 74 years old.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics