TITLE

The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center

AUTHOR(S)
Lee, Bonmyong; Otero, Hansel; Whitehead, Matthew; Otero, Hansel J; Whitehead, Matthew T
PUB. DATE
December 2017
SOURCE
Pediatric Radiology;Dec2017, Vol. 47 Issue 13, p1724
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
Background: The American College of Radiology (ACR) practice parameters for communication dictate that follow-up recommendations be suggested when appropriate. Radiologists assume that referring physicians read their reports and heed their advice. In reality, recommendations might not be carried out or even acknowledged.Objective: We aimed to determine the proportion of imaging recommendations that are acknowledged and acted upon.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive radiology reports containing "recommend" in the impression at a single academic children's hospital over a 1-month period. We documented point of care (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient), study type, recommendation wording, and communication method (report only or direct verbal). We reviewed medical records to ascertain whether the recommendations were acknowledged or executed. We used chi-square tests to evaluate associations between variables. P<0.05 was considered significant.Results: We reviewed 526 reports and excluded 73. We included the remaining 453 reports, from 370 unique patients (201 male, 169 female). Inpatients comprised most reports (n=223), followed by emergency department (ED) patients (n=118) and outpatients (n=112). Among these reports, 69% (n=313) of recommendations were executed. Of the 140 recommendations not carried out, 14% were acknowledged in clinical notes. Compliance correlated with point of care (ED>inpatient>outpatient; P=0.001) but not with additional verbal communication (P=0.33), study type (radiograph vs. other; P=0.35) or type of follow-up recommendation (follow-up imaging vs. other; P=0.99).Conclusion: Nearly one-third of radiology report follow-up recommendations are not executed. Recommendations are most commonly neglected for outpatient imaging reports. The radiology community should take steps to improve recommendation adherence.
ACCESSION #
126306234

 

Related Articles

  • Gavant Inducted as Fellow.  // Baltimore Jewish Times;6/13/2014, Vol. 338 Issue 7, p53 

    The article offers information on doctor Morris L. Gavant who was inducted as a fellow in the American College of Radiology (ACR) in 2014.

  • Bipartisan bill bans cuts to professional imaging fees. MCCARTY, MARK // Medical Device Daily;11/1/2011, Vol. 15 Issue 209, p1 

    The article reports on the influence of the American College of Radiology on a U.S. bipartisan bill that would ban further reductions to the professional component of Part B imaging fees. It is noted that the Diagnostic Imaging Services Protection Act would significantly cut the Medicare...

  • Value Vs Volume. Sanchez Wilson, Elaine // Imaging Economics;Oct2013, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p18 

    The article focuses on the Imaging 3.0 campaign launched by the American College of Radiology (ACR), which aims to provide resources to radiologists on shifting from volume to value. Doctor Geraldine McGinty says that the specialty's value needs to be shown through the interaction with patients...

  • 11th-Hour Decision Support. Lower, Jenny // Imaging Economics;May/Jun2014, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p8 

    The article focuses on the enactment of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 or the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). Topics include the authority given to physicians and radiologists to consult an appropriate criteria before prescribing procedures of imaging for Medicare patients, the...

  • Taking It to the Hill. Woock, Kurt // Imaging Economics;Apr2013, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p8 

    The article focuses on the effort of the American College of Radiology (ACR) to identify leaders who play an important role in developing health policy in Washington, D.C. ACR congressional affairs director Chris Sherin says that the effort is an aimed grassroots lobbying campaign regarding the...

  • Preparing for (and Surviving) an ACR On Site Accreditation Inspection. West, W. Geoffrey // Radiology Management;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p12 

    The author discusses ways radiology professionals can prepare and survive an American College of Radiology (ACR) on site accreditation inspection. He emphasizes the importance for an accredited facility to be well prepared and to consider a visit from the ACR as an educational opportunity and a...

  • Safety First. Matthews, Marianne // Imaging Economics;Aug2012 Supplement 1, Vol. 25, p11 

    The article focuses on the imaging department at St. Vincent's Medical Center in Bridgeport, Connecticut. According to facility director Rachel Gilliotti, the imaging department offers state-of-the-art technology and multi-modality commitment to patient safety. It adds that the department is...

  • Pediatric Radiology Continuing Medical Education Activity.  // Pediatric Radiology;Jan2013, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p128 

    A quiz by the American College of Radiology on pediatric radiology is presented.

  • ACR DEBUTS DIGITAL EDITION OF ACR BI-RADS ATLAS.  // Imaging Update;Oct2014, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p1 

    The article reports that the fifth edition of the "American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas" has been released in electronic format in October 2014.

  • Training for an Industry in Flux. Freedman, Ronald E. // T+D;May2014, Vol. 68 Issue 5, p80 

    The article presents a case study of the Emerging Leaders leadership and management seminar developed by the Radiology Leadership Institute (RLI) of the American College of Radiology. Topics include the session's goal to prepare radiologists for the increasing importance of soft skills in their...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics