TITLE

Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon's experience

AUTHOR(S)
Escobar-Dominguez, Jose; Garcia-Quintero, Pedro; Hernandez-Murcia, Christian; Verdeja, Juan-Carlos; Escobar-Dominguez, Jose E
PUB. DATE
November 2016
SOURCE
Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2016, Vol. 30 Issue 11, p4793
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
Background: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as an alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Technical difficulty, prolonged surgical times and increased complication rates have been reported in single-incision laparoscopic surgery. One of the concerns is lack of triangulation of instruments. The SPIDER® surgical system is a single-incision laparoscopic device that utilizes flexible instruments with the purpose of achieving adequate triangulation. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of SPIDER versus LC.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LC and SPIDER cholecystectomy by a single surgeon during a concurrent 44-month period at Baptist Health South Florida hospitals was performed focusing on demographics, indication for surgery, complications and incisional hernia rates. Exclusion criteria were concomitant surgery and hernia repair at the time of surgery.Results: A total of 612 patients underwent minimally invasive cholecystectomy: 279 cases for SPIDER cholecystectomy and 333 for multiport LC. Baseline differences in patient characteristics between the SPIDER and LC groups were statistically significant. The SPIDER group had younger and healthier patients (lower ASA classification scores) with predominant diagnosis of cholelithiasis (69 %) compared to the LC group which had more complex cases. Total complications rate for both SPIDER and LC were 0.4 % (n = 1) and 3 % (n = 10), respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in one patient from the LC group (0.3 %). Conversion rate from SPIDER to additional ports or LC was performed in 5 cases (1.8 %) with no conversions to open surgery. Hemoperitoneum was reported in 2 cases, one for each approach, requiring reoperation.Conclusion: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with SPIDER is a safe and feasible technique with similar outcomes to multiport LC. However, statistical significant difference was reported in baseline characteristics of both groups. No incisional hernias were reported in this case series for either technique.
ACCESSION #
119090922

 

Related Articles

  • New methods for innovation: the development of a toolbox for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. Swain, C.; Bally, Kurt; Park, Per-Ola; Alexander Mosse, C.; Rothstein, Richard // Surgical Endoscopy;Apr2012, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p1010 

    Background: Devices used for flexible intralumenal procedures are inadequate when used for intraperitoneal surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy. Objective: To assess/address limitations of flexible endoscopic devices in intraperitoneal surgery. Design: To describe processes used to invent...

  • Improving the retention of suturing needles in surgical graspers. Brown, S. I.; White, G.; Wipat, K.; Frank, T. G.; Cuschieri, A. // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2004, Vol. 18 Issue 11, p1605 

    Background: Surgical needles are usually held using dedicated grasping instruments. When the tissue to be penetrated is resilient, or the grasping force is low, the needle can swivel, causing it to deviate from the intended path, resulting in suboptimal tissue approximation. Needle swivel is...

  • Ergonomie Design and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Instrument Handle Based on Anthropometry. Changying Sun; Shuyi Wang; Bingcao Wang // Advanced Materials Research;2014, Vol. 950, p109 

    The laparoscopic instruments cause pain, numbness and damages to surgeons during the operation due to poor ergonomie design. Anthropometry is one of the most important factors in ergonomie design. Six hand dimensions have been measured in gripping position of fourteen subjects. A prototype...

  • Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children Using Standard Straight Instruments: A Surgeon's Early Experience. Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert; Shah, Sohail R.; Kane, Timothy D. // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p555 

    Background: With the evolution of surgical techniques and instrumentation, surgeons have adapted methods to provide safe and effective therapy through less invasive operations. Conventional laparoscopy utilizes several small incisions in well-separated areas of the body, but more recently,...

  • Nuss Procedure: Decrease in Bar Movement Requiring Reoperation with Primary Placement of Two Bars. Stanfill, Amy B.; DiSomma, Nerina; Henriques, Steven M.; Wallace, Lizabeth J.; Vegunta, Ravindra K.; Pearl, Richard H. // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Jun2012, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p412 

    Background: The Nuss procedure, first reported in 1998, is currently the treatment of choice for pectus excavatum. The most significant bar-related complication documented is bar movement, requiring reoperation in 3.4%-27% of reports. Our report compares the initial placement of one Nuss bar...

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Single, Non-teaching Hospital: An Analysis of 1557 Patients. Hasbahceci, Mustafa; Uludag, Murat; Erol, Cengiz; Ozdemir, Arif // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Oct2012, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p527 

    Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may lead to serious complications, although it is the gold standard treatment for gallstones. In this article, the aim was to review our experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Subjects and Methods: All laparoscopic cholecystectomies were...

  • Are blood group and save samples needed for cholecystectomy? Quinn, Martha; Suttie, Stuart; Li, Alan; Ravindran, Rajan // Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2011, Vol. 25 Issue 8, p2505 

    Background: Cholecystectomy is a common, safe procedure. This study aimed to determine whether a blood group and save approach still is required for primary cholecystectomy. Methods: A retrospective regional analysis of all cholecystectomy patients identified from pathology records between...

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients Over 80 Years is Feasible and Safe: Analysis of 68 Consecutive Cases. Dennis, R.; Guy, R.; Bajwa, F. // World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery;May-Aug2009, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p22 

    Background: Wide variations are reported in morbidity, mortality and conversion rates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the octogenarian population. As a retrospective review, this paper reports the experience of a district general hospital unit in the management of gallstone disease in an...

  • The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments. Martinec, Danny V.; Gatta, Prakash; Bin Zheng; Denk, Peter M.; Swanström, Lee L. // Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2009, Vol. 23 Issue 12, p2697 

    Laparoscopic instruments are rigid and thus cannot provide the degrees of freedom (DOF) needed by a surgeon in certain situations. A new generation of laparoscopic instruments with the ability to articulate their end effectors is available. Although these instruments offer the flexibility needed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics