A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Watanabe, Yusuke; Bilgic, Elif; Lebedeva, Ekaterina; McKendy, Katherine; Feldman, Liane; Fried, Gerald; Vassiliou, Melina; McKendy, Katherine M; Feldman, Liane S; Fried, Gerald M; Vassiliou, Melina C
March 2016
Surgical Endoscopy;Mar2016, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p832
Academic Journal
journal article
Background: Multiple tools are available to assess clinical performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but there are no guidelines on how best to implement and interpret them in educational settings. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and critically appraise LC assessment tools and their measurement properties, in order to make recommendations for their implementation in surgical training.Methods: A systematic search (1989-2013) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and grey literature sources. Evidence for validity (content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences) and the conditions in which the evidence was obtained were evaluated.Results: A total of 54 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Fifteen technical skills and two non-technical skills assessment tools were identified. The 17 tools were used for either: recorded procedures (nine tools, 60%), direct observation (five tools, 30%), or both (three tools, 18%). Fourteen (82%) tools reported inter-rater reliability and one reported a Generalizability Theory coefficient. Nine (53%) had evidence for validity based on clinical experience and 11 (65%) compared scores to other assessments. Consequences of scores, educational impact, applications to residency training, and how raters were trained were not clearly reported. No studies mentioned cost.Conclusions: The most commonly reported validity evidence was inter-rater reliability and relationships to other known variables. Consequences of assessments and rater training were not clearly reported. These data and the evidence for validity should be taken into consideration when deciding how to select and implement a tool to assess performance of LC, and especially how to interpret the results.


Related Articles

  • Cosmetic Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. C̆ala, Zoran; Niks̆ić, Krunoslav; Nesek-Adam, Vis̆nja; Klapan, Denis; Soldo, Ivo // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Dec2006, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p577 

    Background: The cosmetic outcome and recovery time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been improved by modifying the operation technique and reducing the number and size of trocars. The next step to improve cosmetic results is moving two trocars below the pubic hairline. We describe our...

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis: The importance of being left-handed. Oms, L. M.; Badia, J. M. // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2003, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p1859 

    Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard procedure for the treatment of gallstone disease, several cases have been reported in patients with situs inversus. These cases require more technically demanding procedures due to the symmetrical disposition of the anatomy. Thus,...

  • Subcapsular hematoma of the liver after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Shetty, Geeta S.; Falconer, J. Stuart; Benyounes, Hakim // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Feb2005, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p48 

    Two female patients underwent an uneventful laparoscopic chloecystectomy (LC) for cholelithiasis. Their past medical history was insignificant. The first patient had diclofenac sodium for her postoperative pain relief. Both patients returned in the early postoperative period with pain in the...

  • Spilled gall stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of the literature. Sathesh-Kumar T; Saklani A P; Vinayagam R; Blackett R L; Sathesh-Kumar, T; Saklani, A P; Vinayagam, R; Blackett, R L // Postgraduate Medical Journal;Feb2004, Vol. 80 Issue 940, p77 

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with spillage of gall stones in 5%-40% of procedures, but complications occur very rarely. There are, however, isolated case reports describing a range of complications occurring both at a distance from and near to the subhepatic area. This review looks...

  • Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Uchiyama, K.; Tani, M.; Kawai, M.; Ueno, M.; Hama, T.; Yamaue, H. // Surgical Endoscopy;Jul2006, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p1119 

    Background: The incidence of aberrant bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not yet been adequately examined. This study aimed to clarify the types of normal cystic ducts and the incidence of aberrant extrahepatic bile ducts, and to search for a...

  • Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. McCloy, Rory; Randall, Delia; Schug, Stephan A.; Kehlet, Henrik; Simanski, Christian; Bonnet, Francis; Camu, Frederic; Fischer, Barrie; Joshi, Girish; Rawal, Narinder; Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. // Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p2541 

    In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision <25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to...

  • Assessing patient-reported outcomes of cholecystectomy in short-stay surgery. Bitzer, Eva Maria; Lorenz, Christoph; Nickel, Stefan; Dörning, Hans; Trojan, Alf // Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p2712 

    The project aimed at testing the feasibility of a quality improvement system based on patient-reported outcomes in short-stay surgery for cholecystectomy. In two centers for short-stay surgery, patients referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were surveyed between Aug 1999 and Jan 2002....

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Pediatric Population. St. Peter, Shawn D.; Keckler, Scott J.; Nair, Abhilash; Andrews, Walter S.; Sharp, Ronald J.; Snyder, Charles L.; Ostlie, Daniel J.; Holbomc III, George W. // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Feb2008, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p127 

    Background: The experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children trails the adult numbers and remains underreported. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with this approach. Methods: A retrospective review of our most recent 6-year experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at...

  • Gastroduodenoscopy: a routine examination of 2,800 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sosada, K.; Zurawinski, W.; Piecuch, J.; Stepien, T.; Makarska, J. // Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2005, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p1103 

    Background: Unrecognized gastric and duodenal peptic ulcer is a common cause of epigastric pains for patients with cholelithiasis qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Undiagnosed gastric or duodenal ulcer may be the cause of persistent pains after cholecystectomy. The purpose...

  • Accuracy of staging laparoscopy in detecting peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Simon, M.; Mal, F.; Perniceni, T.; Ferraz, J.-M.; Strauss, C.; Levard, H.; Louvet, C.; Fuks, D.; Gayet, B. // Diseases of the Esophagus;Apr2016, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p236 

    Despite staging laparoscopy ( SL) with peritoneal lavage is recommended in US Guidelines in patients with potentially resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, this procedure is not systematically proposed in French Guidelines. Therefore, we decided to analyze the results of systematic SL in...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics