Attwood, Daniel
May 2007
Engineers Journal;May2007, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p239
Academic Journal
An interview with Daniel Hancock, vice president of the powertrain global engineering division of General Motors Corp. and Lewis Booth, executive vice president of the Ford Motor Co., is presented. Both men agree that using hydrogen is the only way for a zero-emission vehicle. But Booth says that the solution presents massive technical hurdles. Hancock mentions the bio-fuel cars offered by the company. The advantages and disadvantages of fuel and engine technologies are mentioned.


Related Articles

  • Greenhighways. Baumgarten, Stefan // ICIS Chemical Business;10/8/2007, Vol. 272 Issue 13, p2 

    The article reports that U.S.-based automobile manufacturers General Motors Corp. (GM), Ford Motor Co., and Chrysler Corp. have agreed to make vehicles that run on biofuels. The Big Three U.S. carmakers have pledged that by 2012, half of their annual vehicle production will be capable of running...

  • The green revolution: It's a chemistry thing. Truett, Richard // Automotive News;11/20/2006, Vol. 81 Issue 6230, p32F 

    The article focuses on issues related to the production of vehicles with hydrogen-powered fuel cells and other green technologies. Automakers believe fuel cell-powered cars will be ready for the road long before hydrogen is available at filling stations. Honda Motor Co. Ltd., Ford Motor Co. and...

  • Big Three to double biofuel vehicles by 2010.  // Automotive Manufacturing Solutions;Jul/Aug2006, p17 

    The article deals with the move of the Big Three U.S. carmakers, General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler, to double the production of biofuel vehicles by year 2010. The leaders of the automakers have also urged oil companies and U.S. legislators to increase the number of fueling stations...

  • Big 3 to boost `95 production. Detkowski, Karen L. // Automotive News;12/12/1994, Vol. 69 Issue 5582, p2 

    Reports on the Big 3's expected manufacture of 3,419,100 vehicles in North America in the first quarter of 1995. Percentage of vehicle production of General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Corp.

  • Automakers plan to develop `private Internet'. Kisiel, Ralph // Automotive News;10/2/1995, Vol. 70 Issue 5625, p6 

    Reports that Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. will develop an Automotive Network exchange communication network for the automobile industry through the Automotive Industry Action Group in the United States.

  • Auto industry's dilemma: Brand building vs. price breaks. Serafin, Raymond // Automotive News;1/22/1996, Vol. 70 Issue 5642, p33 

    Reports on the auto industry's offer of rebates across product lineup to perk up a lackluster market. Ford Motor Co.'s rebates; Cheapening of brand image caused by rebates; Offer of incentives on slow-selling models; General Motors' and Ford's adoption of brand management structures to produce...

  • On with the show, this is it.  // AutoWeek;01/10/2000, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p2 

    Reports on news briefs about the automobile industry in as of January 10, 2000. Debut of the 2001 Mercedes-Benz C-Class sedan in Geneva, Switzerland; Launch by Ford Motor Co. of concept cars at the Detroit automobile show; Marketing rights of General Motors Corp. for the civilian Hummer.

  • New work abounds as upturn continues.  // Ward's Auto World;Apr94, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports on the increase in employment in several automobile companies. Ford Motor Co.'s addition of a third shift and 900 workers; Chrysler Corp.'s hiring of 6000 hourly workers; General Motors Corp.'s sale of compact pickups to American Isuzu Motors Inc.

  • 2000 Harbour Report. Winter, Drew // Ward's Auto World;Jul2000, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p71 

    No abstract available.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics