TITLE

Rush-Bagot agreement

PUB. DATE
August 2017
SOURCE
Rush-Bagot Agreement;8/1/2017, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Primary Source Document
DOC. TYPE
Historical Material
ABSTRACT
Presents the text of the Rush-Bagot Agreement of 1818, a series of documents signed between the United States and Great Britain in which both nations agreed to reduce their naval forces on the Great Lakes. Reasons for the agreement.
ACCESSION #
21213047

 

Related Articles

  • Transformation--An International Perspective.  // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Summer2000, Issue 25, p11 

    Assesses modes of transformation of the armed forces of seven countries in different regions in the world. Strategic interest of the United States in the armed forces of China, India, France, Indonesia, South Africa, Poland and Colombia; Enhancement of regional capabilities; Re-shaping of...

  • Dissuading China and Fighting the "Long War.". Conetta, Carl // World Policy Journal;Summer2006, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p1 

    The article discusses the third Quadrennial Defense Review for 2006 submitted by U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The report highlights the military strategies of war against Islamic radicalism, especially in Iraq, and improving military affairs with China by means of military...

  • On Our Scope. Schultz, Fred L. // Naval History;Jun2001, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p6 

    Introduces articles featured in the June 2001 issue of the periodical 'Naval History.' Dedication ceremonies for Singapore's Changi Chapel and Museum; Production of the motion picture 'Pearl Harbor'; Bicentennial reassessment of the war between the United States and Libya; Performance of naval...

  • Absurd, obscene and reckless -- American nuclear weapons in the defence of Australia. TANTER, RICHARD // D!ssent;Spring2013, Issue 42, p26 

    The article talks about Australia's reliance on nuclear retaliation by the U.S. The country's policy of reliance on U.S. extended nuclear deterrence in its defence is described as absurd, obscene, and reckless. Australia is advised to abandon the fantasy crutch of U.S. extended nuclear...

  • Deterrence: from fear to interdependence. Snyder, Edward F. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Oct1985, Vol. 41 Issue 9, p40 

    Explores the operation of deterrence in the U.S. Military and security policy of the U.S.; International control of nuclear weapons; Military relations between the U.S. and Soviet Union; Arms control negotiations; Removal of restrictions on trade in peaceful goods.

  • US DoD Ponders China Threat. McKenna, Ted // Journal of Electronic Defense;Sep2005, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p32 

    Focuses on the concerns of the Department of Defense regarding the growing military threat of China to U.S. national security. Views on the growing suspicions regarding Chinese military intentions towards the U.S.; Importance of the economic relations between the U.S. and China; Insights on the...

  • IRAQ: POLICING THE PEACE. Tripodi, Paolo // Contemporary Review;Jul2003, Vol. 283 Issue 1650, p16 

    Focuses on the struggles of the U.S.-led coalition to achieve military supremacy in Iraq. Possibility of the emergence of humanitarian crisis; Minimization of the coalition casualties; Deployment of combat support units and military police for peacekeeping duties.

  • Shaping on NATO's Doorstep U.S.-Ukraine Relations. Shea, Timothy C. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Autumn2001, Issue 29, p58 

    Examines how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) executes the national military strategy in shaping the international security environment relative to Ukraine. U.S. engagement strategy; Overview on the military structure and force of Ukraine; Vision statement of the U.S.-Ukraine Joint Working...

  • Conservatives, Liberals Agree: Clinton Strategic Policy a Dud. Mann, Paul // Aviation Week & Space Technology;6/12/2000, Vol. 152 Issue 24, p30 

    Reports on comments by missile defense and arms control advocates about the alleged weakness of the strategic policy of United States President Bill Clinton as reflected in the results of the 2000 Moscow Summit. Summit's failure to produce an updated Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty or more...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics