TITLE

Lectio divina and Literary Criticism: from John Cassian to Stanley Fish

AUTHOR(S)
Robertson, Duncan
PUB. DATE
February 2011
SOURCE
Cistercian Studies Quarterly;2011, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p83
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on the reader-response movement. It explores the proposal of author Stanley Fish to follow the developing responses of the reader in relation to the words. It emphasizes that the lectio divina extends a process of reception, experience, interpretation and consequent activity beyond the act of reading.
ACCESSION #
58603271

 

Related Articles

  • UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETATION, ART, AND NEOPRAGMATISM. Kremer, Alexander // Value Inquiry Book Series;2014, Vol. 275, p63 

    The article discusses the main claims, proofs and consequences of philosophical hermeneutics or the study of the principle of interpretation. Topics include the history of hermeneutics, the development of philosophical hermeneutics by philosophers Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer and its...

  • Interpretation in Law: The Dworkin-Fish Debate (Or, Soccer Amongst the Gahuku-Gama). Schelly, Judith M. // California Law Review;Jan1985, Vol. 73 Issue 1, p158 

    Discusses the views of Stanley Fish and Ronald Dworkin on legal interpretation. Speculated purpose of a theory of legal interpretation; View of the two on history.

  • Stanley Fish's Milton. Oakes, Edward T. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov2001, Issue 117, p23 

    Focuses on the publication of the book 'How Milton Works,' by Stanley Fish, academic dean of the University of Illinois in Chicago. Views of the readers about Milton before the publication of the book; Details of the themes discussed in the book; Responses of Fish to criticisms about the book.

  • Is he too P.C. to favor black ink?  // Business North Carolina;Aug94, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p64 

    Profiles Stanley Fish, director of the Duke University Press. Educational attainment; Career history; Job responsibilities.

  • Covert Scholarship. Hart, Jeffrey // National Review;2/25/1991, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p4 

    Presents a reply from Jeffrey Hart to a letter to the editor concerning reports of controversy in the National Association of Scholars, as it is discussed in Hart's article "Epistemological Fascism at Duke," in the December 17 issue.

  • A Laughing Matter. Stock, R. D. // National Review;4/1/1991, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p4 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to a defense of Stanley Fish and his brush with the National Association of Scholars by Professor of Law David Lange in the February 25 issue.

  • Fish and Milton--briefly. Bellis, George // English Language Notes;Jun95, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p23 

    Focuses on the interpretation of John Milton' sonnet `On the Late Massacre in Piedmont,' by critic Stanley Fish. Examples of points raised by Fish in his past literary approaches which were used in interpreting the sonnet; Meaning of references to God in the sonnet according to Fish; Relevance...

  • THE DEAN'S LIST. MacFarquhar, Larissa // New Yorker;06/11/2001, Vol. 77 Issue 15, p62 

    Profiles Stanley Fish, dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences in the University of Illinois at Chicago. Description of the personality of Fish; Career background; Attitude of Fish towards his colleagues.

  • Do Lawyers need Philosophy? Lenta, Patrick // South African Journal of Philosophy;2003, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p81 

    Neo-pragmatists Richard Rorty and Stanley Fish have recently argued that philosophy has no consequences for legal practice (except, in the case of Fish, in so far as it carries rhetorical force). They have asserted not only that philosophy cannot provide absolute metaphysical foundations for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics