TITLE

LIMITS OF INTERPRETIVISM

AUTHOR(S)
Primus, Richard
PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2009, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p159
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay about the limitations of the practice of interpretivism by some U.S. judges when interpreting the law is presented. The differences between textualism, originalism and traditional judging are examined. The concept of interpretivism and textualism entail that judges should decide constitutional and statutory cases by interpreting the words of the applicable constitutions and statutes. The author notes that judges must choose among valid forms of legal reasoning in interpreting the constitutional law.
ACCESSION #
37171232

 

Related Articles

  • ORIGINALISM'S PRETENSES. Berger, Eric // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p329 

    When conservatives in the 1980s offered originalism as a constitutional methodology that could limit perceived judicial excesses, they touted its ability to constrain judges to follow the Constitution's fixed, original meaning. Though originalism has changed many times since, its proponents...

  • The Federal Right to an Adequate Education. Friedman, Barry; Solow, Sara // George Washington Law Review;Jan2013, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p92 

    Common wisdom has it that there is no federal constitutional right to an education; indeed, under our charter of negative liberties the common understanding is that there are no positive rights at all. This Article challenges common wisdom, arguing that there is in fact a federal constitutional...

  • Judicial Capacity and the Substance of Constitutional Law. COAN, ANDREW B. // Yale Law Journal;Nov2012, Vol. 122 Issue 2, p422 

    Courts can decide only a small fraction of constitutional issues generated by the American government. This is widely acknowledged. But why do courts have such limited capacity? And how does this limitation affect the substance of constitutional law? This Essay advances a twofold thesis. First,...

  • A Country Without Courts: Doing More with Less in Twenty-First Century Federal Courts. DUBAY, CAROLYN A. // New England Law Review;Spring2014, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p531 

    The article discusses a proposed analytical framework for evaluating U.S. federal judicial performance measurements, focusing on judicial behavior in America, a constitutional goal of effective federal court adjudication, and the impacts of a proposed metric on judicial resources and cost...

  • HOW DO JUDGES THINK? HARTZ, HARRIS L. // Denver University Law Review;2014, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p575 

    An essay is presented on how judges in America think, focusing on judicial power and judicial decision-making in the U.S., as well as information about a mandate of consistency in relation to the writing of judicial opinions. The personalities and psychological traits of various trial and...

  • DEAD DOCUMENT WALKING. Lawson, Gary // Boston University Law Review;Jul2012, Vol. 92 Issue 4, p1225 

    The article focuses on modern constitutional theory, focusing on the differences between originalism and living constitutionalism. Topics include legal interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, the new originalism movement, and interpretative theory. Information is provided on constitutional...

  • A Fiduciary Theory of Judging. Leib, Ethan J.; Ponet, David L.; Serota, Michael // California Law Review;Jun2013, Vol. 101 Issue 3, p699 

    For centuries, legal theorists and political philosophers have unsuccessfully sought a unified theory of judging able to account for the diverse, and oftentimes conflicting, responsibilities judges possess. This paper reveals how the law governing fiduciary relationships sheds new light on this...

  • FOREWORD.  // University of Colorado Law Review;Fall2014, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p933 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including federalism in the U.S., constitutional law, and the development of law in the U.S.

  • HOW I LOST MY CONSTITUTIONAL FAITH. Levinson, Sanford // Maryland Law Review;2012, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p956 

    An essay on constitutional interpretation is presented. Topics include why the U.S. Constitution has become an anti-model for countries drafting constitutions, the lack of human rights terminology in the U.S. Constitution, and the concept of constitutional faith. Information is provided on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics