Easterbrook, Frank H.
June 2008
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2008, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p901
Academic Journal
An essay on the role of originalism and pragmatism in interpreting constitution in the U.S. It says that pragmatists believe that it is both wise and appropriate to modify constitutional norms to serve the needs of the society. It considers originalism as the tool of the judicial branch because it is the only method that states why judges have the final decision. The author emphasizes that one must find a norm that matched to the constitution and to the actor's role.


Related Articles

  • A PRAGMATIC DEFENSE OF ORIGINALISM. McGinnis, John O.; Rappaport, Michael B. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2008, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p917 

    An essay on pragmatic defense of originalism, an approach to interpret the U.S. Constitution, is presented. It stresses that entrenched laws should be prioritize over ordinary legislation because they function to create a structure of U.S. government that maintains democratic decision-making and...

  • THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AND ADVISABILITY OF RECESS APPOINTMENTS OF ARTICLE III JUDGES. Motz, Diana Gribbon // Virginia Law Review;Nov2011, Vol. 97 Issue 7, p1665 

    An essay is presented on the constitutionality of recess appointments of Article III judges. The author discusses how the issue was popularized due to controversy when former U.S. President Bill Clinton made a recess appointment to the Fourth Circuit Court. An examination of if recess...

  • Create Your Own Constitutional Theory. Dorf, Michael C. // California Law Review;May99, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p593 

    Argues that the critics of constitutional pragmatism are right to reject pure adjudicatory instrumentalism, but that a different conception of pragmatism should inform constitutional interpretation. Discussion of meta-theory; Existence of the degree of consensus among constitutional theorists;...

  • Pervasive Not Perverse: Semi-Sovereigns as the Global Norm. Krasner, Stephen D. // Cornell International Law Journal;1997, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p651 

    The article comments on the concept of sovereignty. It says that the concept of sovereignty has always been problematic and none of its elements including, control, authority, non-intervention, recognition, territoriality, have ever gone without challenge. It further says that the norms and...

  • Will Supreme Court Rule Correctly on 2nd Amendment? Lund, Nelson // Human Events;1/6/2003, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p18 

    Deals with the disagreement between the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and 5th Circuit on a case about an individual's right to bear arms. Provision of the 2nd Amendment on the right of individuals to possess firearms; Interpretation of both courts to the 2nd Amendment; Flaws of the...

  • EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SEIZED EVIDENCE AT THE PRELIMINARY HEARING.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Jun1975, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p135 

    This comment has surveyed how many courts and legislative bodies in the United States have treated the issue of whether evidence seized in violation of constitutional rights should be excluded at preliminary hearings. In some states, the decision has been made to allow exclusion on motion of the...

  • Jefferson County Ratepayers Argue Rights Were Trampled in Bankruptcy Exit. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;9/10/2015, Vol. 1 Issue 34375, p1 

    A group of Jefferson County, Ala., residents told an appellate court they were denied constitutional protections in the rush to end the county's "large and complicated" Chapter 9 bankruptcy in 2013.

  • Anarchy Ain't so Great. Melton, Gary B. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Apr1993, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p259 

    No abstract available.

  • IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PUBLIC MORALITY AND FREE SPEECH ACROSS THE PACIFIC. Dermott, Terrence // Columbia Journal of Asian Law;Spring2013, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p105 

    Most modern democracies have embraced some concept of freedom of expression in their system of jurisprudence. This right is not unfettered and the tension between free speech and societal norms is an ongoing legal question. Both Korean and American Courts have addressed the issue of what to do...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics